Daniel Scott Bradley, et ux. LInda Bradley, v. Geneva Lynn McCord McLeod, et vir Rodrick McLeod
This case involves a dispute between two neighbors in the Fairview community of Williamson County concerning the use of a gravel driveway. Three years after purchasing a tract of land on which portions of the driveway were located, the property owners filed suit in the Chancery Court for Williamson County to quiet title to the portions of the driveway they believed to be on their property. Their neighbors responded that the driveway was their only access to a pubic road and that they had acquired a right to use the driveway by adverse possession. After the trial court granted the plaintiffs’ uncontested motion for summary judgment, the defendants filed a Tenn. R. Civ. P. 59.04 motion asserting that they had an “easement of presumption” to use the driveway. The trial court denied the post-judgment motion on the ground that the new defense had not been timely raised. On this appeal, the losing property owners take issue with the trial court’s decision to grant the summary judgment and to deny their post-judgment motion. We affirm the summary judgment. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Jason Rains, Crystal L. Carney, and Kathy Carney v. Edwin Scott Sussdorff,III, a/k/a/ Ed Sussdorff, Vicky R. Sussdorff, E. Scott Sussdorff and Allstate Insurance Company - Concurring
While riding as passengers in an automobile owned by defendant and driven by a close friend of defendant’s son, the intervening plaintiff was seriously injured in a one-car accident when the driver apparently fell asleep at the wheel. The passenger intervened in the driver’s petition and alleged that the vehicle had been driven with the express or implied permission of its owner and sought a declaratory judgment that his insurer was therefore liable for her injuries. The trial court found the driver did not have such permission and dismissed intervenor’s petition, and she appeals. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Heather Alicia Roach Thomson v. Patrick James Thomson - Concurring
This is an appeal from a post-divorce proceeding wherein the appellant sought a change in custody of the parties minor child on the grounds that there had been a material change of circumstances justifying such a change. The trial court dismissed the complaint and this appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Union | Court of Appeals | |
The CIT Group/Sales Financing vs. Leslie Williams
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Renaissance vs. Billbury
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Pigeon vs. Maples
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Allstate vs. Daniel
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9708-CV-0365
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Donald Zseltvay vs. Metropolitan Government
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ashe vs. Radiation Oncology Associates
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ashe vs. Radiation Oncology Associates
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Hartsville Hospital, Inc. vs. The National Bank & Trust Co.
|
Trousdale | Court of Appeals | |
Angela Hogan vs. Rex Reese and Sonya M. Reese
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Edward Traughber, et al. vs. Kelly A. Kress, et al.
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Concrete Spaces, Inc., et al. vs. Henry Sender, et al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Donald Davis vs. Sumner County Sheriff, J. D. Vandercook, et al.
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Henry Andrews vs. Lubricon, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Rodgers vs. Walker
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Wanda Ortiz Degroot, v. Michael Degroot
The controversy in this appeal concerns the award of custody of Andrew, the parties' two-year-old son, to the mother. |
Greene | Court of Appeals | |
Clapp vs. Goldston
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9707-CH-00278
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Phillips vs. Watkins
|
Court of Appeals | ||
United vs. Loudon
|
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9710-CH-000474
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Bland vs. Cowan
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals |
