Jackson Rose vs. Rick Welch E2002-02042-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.
Attorney R. Jackson Rose ("Plaintiff") was hired by Rick Welch ("Defendant') to defend him on drug related criminal charges. The parties agreed to a flat fee of $25,000 for this legal representation. A retainer of $5,000 was paid up-front. Defendant signed a promissory note for the remaining $20,000. Defendant claims he lost confidence in Plaintiff's ability to adequately represent him after Defendant paid a total of $6,850 in attorney fees. Defendant discharged Plaintiff and obtained new counsel. Plaintiff sued for breach of contract. Defendant filed a counterclaim for legal malpractice and also claimed as a defense, inter alia, that Plaintiff's representation fell below the professional standard of care. The case was tried to a jury. After all of the proof was presented, the Trial Court directed a verdict for Plaintiff because Defendant had offered no expert proof to support his counterclaim or his defense to the breach of contract claim. We hold expert proof was not necessary in order for Defendant to prove he lost confidence in Plaintiff and discharged him with cause for that reason. We, therefore, reverse the entry of the directed verdict as to that issue only and remand the case for trial on the sole issue of termination for cause because of Defendant's "loss of confidence." We affirm all other aspects of the Trial Court's judgment.
Claiborne
Court of Appeals
Zora Elsea vs. Frank Elsea E2002-00387-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Jerri S. Bryant
In this divorce action, the Trial Court identified, valued and divided marital property and awarded wife alimony. Husband appeals. We affirm the Trial Court.
McMinn
Court of Appeals
Shirley Klein vs. David Klein E2002-00867-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Ben K. Wexler
In this divorce proceeding the wife, Shirley Jean Klein, appeals the judgment of the Trial Court which held that Ms. Klein was not entitled to alimony. We affirm.
Greene
Court of Appeals
Margaret Wightman vs. Truman Clouse E2002-00318-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
The Trial Court held plaintiff was entitled to use roadway across defendants' land. On appeal, we affirm.
Court of Appeals
Margaret Wightman vs. Truman Clouse E2002-00318-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal
The Trial Court held plaintiff was entitled to use roadway across defendants' land. On appeal, we affirm.
Cumberland
Court of Appeals
Maury County v. Board of Equalization M2002-00501-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Following a de novo hearing pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-1511(b), the Chancery Court of Davidson County upheld the final decision of the Assessment Appeals Commission of the Tennessee State Board of Equalization in a determination that property owned by Maury Regional Hospital and located in Marshall County, Tennessee was subject to ad valorem taxation by Marshall County. Maury Regional Hospital appeals the decision of the Chancellor. The decision of the trial court is reversed, and the Marshall County property known as Marshall Medical Center is held to be exempt from ad valorem taxation.
Maury
Court of Appeals
Steven Means v. David Ashby M2002-00285-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson
Current custodian of Minor Child petitioned the court for termination of parental rights of both parents. Petitioners are the brother and sister-in-law of Minor Child's mother. The parents of the Minor Child are divorced. Mother had no contact with Minor Child for over a year prior to the Petition, and Father has had no contact for approximately five years. We find that any failure to visit by the parents and failure to support by the Mother was not willful and affirm the trial court in dismissing the Petition to Terminate their parental rights. However, the trial court's custody determination is vacated, and that issue is remanded for further consideration.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Sammy Miller v. Board of Probation and Paroles M2002-00426-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
The Board of Paroles declined to parole a prisoner in the custody of the Department of Correction. He claimed that the Parole Board violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws by following a different procedure to reach its decision than was in effect at the time of his crime. The trial court dismissed the prisoner's complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. We affirm the trial court.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Dorsey McGahee v. James Dukes M2002-00753-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Two state prisoners placed in administrative segregation petitioned the Chancery Court of Davidson County for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the prison disciplinary board. The court held that the petition did not state a claim for relief because administrative segregation is not an atypical or significant hardship on the petitions in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. We affirm.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Steven Means v. David Ashby M2002-00285-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson
Current custodian of Minor Child petitioned the court for termination of parental rights of both parents. Petitioners are the brother and sister-in-law of Minor Child's mother. The parents of the Minor Child are divorced. Mother had no contact with Minor Child for over a year prior to the Petition, and Father has had no contact for approximately five years. We find that any failure to visit by the parents and failure to support by the Mother was not willful and affirm the trial court in dismissing the Petition to Terminate their parental rights. However, the trial court's custody determination is vacated, and that issue is remanded for further consideration.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Tucker Corporation v. City of Clarksville M2002-00627-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Chancellor Vernon Neal
Trial Court Judge: John H. Gasaway, III
This is an appeal seeking to overturn the action of the trial court in granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of the City of Clarksville in a suit wherein the plaintiff challenged the validity of an ordinance enacted by the defendant setting water and sewage connection fees based on the square footage of the heated and cooled living space of the house connected to those services. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Montgomery
Court of Appeals
Gary Buck v. John Scalf M2002-00620-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Chancellor Vernon Neal
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Hartford Underwriter's Insurance Company on the ground that plaintiff's uninsured motorist claim against Hartford is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Ronnie Cox vs. Amy Cox E2002-02034-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Steven C. Douglas
Ronnie R. Cox ("Husband") and Amy R. Cox ("Wife") were divorced in 1993. At that time, the parties had two minor children. They subsequently had another child. In 1998, the parties entered into an agreed order that provided for joint physical and legal custody with each parent having equal time with the children. The agreed order also required Husband to pay $200 per month to Wife for child-care expenses. In 2002, Husband filed a Petition for Modification seeking to be relieved of the $200 per month obligation because Wife's income had increased substantially and was equal to, or greater than, Husband's. The Trial Court found, inter alia, the $200 payments were contractual in nature and denied the Petition for Modification. Husband appeals. We reverse.
Cumberland
Court of Appeals
In Re: The estate of Nola Mae Mullins vs. Mary Panther E2002-02094-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: John D. Mcafee
Administrators of the Estate petitioned the Court to require respondent to account for funds held by her by virtue of her power of attorney for deceased. We affirm the Trial Judge's Order requiring an accounting.
Claiborne
Court of Appeals
Helen Cornell vs. State E2002-02173-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Vance W. Cheek
Plaintiff's claim for injuries sustained from falling in hole in state park was dismissed by Commissioner. On appeal, we affirm.
Court of Appeals
Patrick Beaudreau vs. General Motors Acceptance E2002-00850-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
Patrick Beaudreau ("Plaintiff") purchased a new car from Thomas-Hill Auto Center ("Dealer"). In order to finance the purchase of the vehicle, Plaintiff signed a retail installment sales contract ("Contract") at an annual percentage rate ("APR") of 13.5%. The Contract listed Dealer as the creditor. General Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC") purchased the Contract from Dealer at a rate of 11.25% ("buy rate"). GMAC paid Dealer the difference between the APR and the buy rate ("dealer reserve"). Plaintiff sued GMAC claiming GMAC had conspired with Dealer to defraud him by not revealing the dealer reserve and the buy rate, or what Plaintiff claims is the "real interest rate." GMAC filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court found the business practices of GMAC detailed in the record are not unlawful or fraudulent and granted summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in its treatment of Plaintiff's expert's affidavit and in granting summary judgment. We vacate the grant of summary judgment and remand.
Sevier
Court of Appeals
Brenda Buchanan vs. Berkley Buchanan E2002-00915-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: James L. Weatherford
This is a divorce case. Both parties sought a divorce. Brenda Watson Buchanan ("Wife") was granted an absolute divorce from Berkley Ottie Buchanan ("Husband") on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. In its judgment, the trial court decreed, among other things, that Wife was to be paid alimony in the amount of $750 per month for 24 months; costs of $579.70; and attorney's fees of $1,850. Husband appeals contending that the trial court erred in making all of these decrees. We affirm.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Susan Carroll vs. David Carroll E2002-01021-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Steven C. Douglas
This is a divorce case. The only issues raised on appeal pertain to the trial court's award of alimony. That court awarded David William Carroll ("Husband") alimony of $2,000 per month "until the death of either party or his remarriage." Susan Elizabeth Carroll ("Wife") appeals, contending that Husband should be awarded rehabilitative alimony rather than alimony in futuro, and that, in any event, $2,000 per month "is excessive." We modify the trial court's award of alimony. As modified, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.
Cumberland
Court of Appeals
Denise Ashworth vs. Greene County E2002-00500-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Thomas R. Frierson, II
Denise Ashworth, the proprietress of a bed and breakfast in Greene County, filed a declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of a hotel/motel privilege tax authorized by private act of the General Assembly ("the Act") and approved by the Greene County Commission. Among other relief, she seeks the return of approximately $3,000 in taxes collected by her from patrons and paid by her under protest to Greene County. While her suit was pending, the trial court permitted an individual who had stayed one night at a local motel to intervene in this case. The gravamen of his complaint was the same as that of Ashworth's. The trial court granted the defendants summary judgment as to Ashworth's claim, finding that she was not the taxpayer under the Act and, consequently, did not have standing to pursue her claim. As to the intervenor's claim, the trial court held that the Act was unconstitutional and ordered that he be refunded the sum of $1.61, the amount of the tax that he had paid under protest, plus interest. Only Ashworth appeals. She contends that the traditional concept of standing should be broadened to permit her to pursue her claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Greene
Court of Appeals
Charles Whited vs. Christy Fleenor E2002-01185-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: J. Klyne Lauderback
Trial Court ordered child's surname changed from mother's to father's. We reverse.
The mother of a fourteen year old male child appeals the action of the trial judge in denying her Petition for a change of custody. The trial court found that no material change of circumstances had been established by the evidence that would justify change of custody. We affirm the action of the trial court.
The plaintiff filed this action in the Chancery Court of Houston County seeking to quiet title to a parcel of property located there. The court granted the defendants' Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02 motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint, and imposed sanctions pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 11. Although the appellant raises legitimate issues as to the grounds cited for dismissing the complaint, we nevertheless affirm, finding that the complaint conclusively shows that the plaintiff has no colorable title to the subject property.
This appeal involves a conflict between neighbors over whether the Stinsons have a right to use a dirt lane that runs across the edge of Mrs. Bobo's property and connects the Stinsons' property to a county road. The trial court found a prescriptive easement was proved. Mrs. Bobo appeals that judgment to this court on two grounds: (1) that the Stinsons failed to show exclusive use of the easement during the prescriptive period; and (2) that there was no acquiescence to the Stinsons' claim of right to use the easement by the prior owners of what is now Mrs. Bobo's property during the prescriptive period. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
Appellants, state employees, were subjects of a Reduction In Force ("RIF") and appeal the order of the chancery court dismissing their petition for review of the Commissioner of Personnel's decision that their respective positions were correctly resolved in the RIF.
This second appeal in this dispute involves the trial court's modifications of a special master's report regarding the liabilities of the parties after the dissolution of their partnership. The special master reported that one partner, Mr. Eslinger, owed the other partner, Mr. Parks, $10,051.30. Mr. Parks objected, and the trial court modified the special master's report, awarding Mr. Parks an additional $45,427.04, and ordered that Mr. Eslinger pay the costs of the special master. Mr. Eslinger now appeals the trial court's modifications and award of costs. Because the record does not support the trial court's modifications, we reverse and reinstate the master's findings as amended. We modify the award of the costs of the special master.
