COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Dispositive Order?

Sort by

Order

State vs. Tony Higgs 02C01-9610-CC-00360 Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood	Hardeman	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Jerry Hardin 02C01-9609-CC-00303 Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn	Henry	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. William Bell 02C01-9608-CR-00275 Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Victor Reynolds 02C01-9607-CR-00244 Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
02C01-9608-CC-00283 02C01-9608-CC-00283	Madison	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Joe Patrick Sr. 02C01-9608-CC-00269 Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III	Lauderdale	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Will Mays 02C01-9611-CC-00411	Lake	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Bobby Anderson 02C01-9602-CC-00068 Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison	Madison	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
02C01-9601-CR-00020 02C01-9601-CR-00020 Trial Court Judge: L. Terry Lafferty	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Charles Smith 02C01-9607-CC-00241 Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III	Lauderdale	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. James Craft 02C01-9606-CR-00194 Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Heather Dowdy 02C01-9610-CR-00348 Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
State vs. Joe Sloan 02C01-9702-CC-00076 Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon	Madison	Court of Appeals	07/18/97
Rudy Rogers vs. Gerald & Tony Young 02A01-9604-CH-00081 Trial Court Judge: John Walton West	Henry	Court of Appeals	07/17/97
Fred Dean vs. Donal Campbell, et al 02A01-9704-CV-00077 Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III	Lauderdale	Court of Appeals	07/17/97
02A01-611-CV-00267 02A01-611-CV-00267 Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey		Court of Appeals	07/17/97
Reliance Insurance Co. vs. WSN Leasing, Inc. 01A01-9612-CV-00552 Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/16/97
Tomlin, a minor., et. al. vs. Warren, 01A01-9702-CV-00067 Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/16/97
Southeast Drilling & Blasting Services vs. BRS Construction Co. 01A01-9706-CH-00272 Trial Court Judge: Don R. Ash		Court of Appeals	07/16/97
Curtis vs. Curtis 01A01-9508-CV-00385 Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/16/97
Jenkins vs. Jenkins 01A01-9609-CV-00399 Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins	Coffee	Court of Appeals	07/16/97
Droussoitis vs. Damrron, et. al. 01A01-9612-CV-00548 Trial Court Judge: J. S. Daniel	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	07/16/97
State vs. Gray M1998-00256-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell Trial Court Judge: Gale B. Robinson The sole remaining question in this appeal is whether in October of 1998 the General Sessions Court of Davidson County had jurisdiction over a contempt warrant issued for violating the Davidson County Circuit Court's order of protection. We affirm the General Sessions Court's exercise of jurisdiction.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/11/97
Pig Improvement Co. Inc., v. Curt Reaver & Richard Alan Tracey, Jr. - Concurring 01-A-01-9610-CV-00478 Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas W. Brothers This is an appeal by plaintiff/appellant, Pig Improvement Co., Inc., from a decision of the Sixth Circuit Court for Davidson County dismissing Pig Improvements’s complaint against defendants/appellees, Curt Reaver and Richard Alan Tracey, Jr. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/09/97
Mary Jane Bohlen Duggan v. Frederick Louis Bohlen, III 01A01-9611-CV-00535 Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis Trial Court Judge: Judge Marietta M. Shipley This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Mary Jane Bohlen Duggan, from the decision of the trial court modifying the child support obligation of respondent/appellee, Frederick Louis Bohlen, III, and interpreting the parties’ marital dissolution agreement (“MDA”) and a later amendment to the MDA. The court concluded Mr. Bohlen was not in contempt and required him to pay $860.00 per month for the parties’ youngest child, $250.00 per month for each child over eighteen and under twenty-two provided the child is receiving a postgraduate education, andone-half of the children’s postgraduate education expenses. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/09/97