Alexander & Associates, Inc. v. Debra Bond-Owens - Concurring
This is a suit initiated in the General Sessions Court for Davidson County by Alexander & Associates, Inc., an insurance agency, seeking to recover from Debra Bond-Owens, its former employee, reimbursement for payments made to her which it contends were “unearned advanced salary in the amount of $5701.37, plus interest.” |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Shannon Rhea Roberts v. Creig McLaughlin - Concurring
This case originated as a paternity action. Shannon Rea Roberts (“Ms. Roberts”) sought to establish that Creig McLaughlin (“McLaughlin”) was the father of her child, Dylan Daniels Roberts (“Dylan”) (DOB: February 14, 1997). The part of the case now before us concerns the petition to intervene filed in that proceeding by Janice Roberts (“Grandmother”), who is the mother of Shannon Rea Roberts and the grandmother of Dylan. In her petition, Grandmother seeks court-ordered “reasonable visitation rights” with Dylan. McLaughlin moved to dismiss Grandmother’s petition, relying on Rule 12.02(6), Tenn.R.Civ.P., and asserting that the petition “fail[s] to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”1 Id. The trial court granted McLaughlin’s motion, finding2 that T.C.A. § 36-6-306 (Supp. 1998) does not authorize an award of grandparents’ visitation under the undisputed material facts of this case. Grandmother appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in dismissing her petition. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Herman Vanderheyden, d/b/a Vanderheyden Construction Co. v. Ajay Inc. and Federal Savings Bank - Concurring
This is a construction case. The defendant owner hired the plaintiff contractor to build a movie theater. The contract contained an arbitration clause. The owner terminated the contractor before the construction was completed. The contractor filed suit against the owner regarding an amount of money required to be held in escrow pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 66-11-144, which permits the contractor to seek “any remedy in a court of proper jurisdiction . . . .” The trial court stayed the proceedings and ordered the parties to arbitration. We reverse and remand. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Jennifer Kensinger vs.s James Kensinger
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Valerie Humphries vs. Plant Maint.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
TN Downs vs. William Gibbons
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Brennco Inc. vs. Chattanooga Better Housing Comm.
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
State/Carolyn Collier vs. Ephram Collier
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
Memphis Housing vs. Tara Thompson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Paula Marie Brown, v. James A. Brown - Concurring
I concur i themajority opinion. I agree that the majority's approach to determining gross income for current child support is correct in this case. I write separately to express my view that the two-year-average approach utilized by the majority in this case may not be appropriate in all cases. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9811-CH-000380
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Byrd vs. Gibson
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Smith vs. Smith
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Thompson vs. Telco
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Eatherly vs. Eatherly
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Hosale vs. Warren
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Annie Christina Harris
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Nichols vs. Nichols
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Brown vs. Brown
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Behm vs. Behm
|
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
Cannon vs. City of Chattanooga
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Hart vs. Tourte
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9809-CV-00312
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Phung vs. Case
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Phung vs. Case
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals |