Case Number
E2024-00698-COA-R3-CV
I write separately to concur with and in support of the majority opinion of the Court.
Although both the majority and dissenting opinions are correct that Plaintiff bore the initial
burden of establishing compliance with Section 121, I concur with the majority’s decision
to remand for an evidentiary hearing, given one defense counsel’s admission that his client
received a signed medical authorization. Martin v. Rolling Hills Hosp., LLC, 600 S.W.3d
322, 334 (Tenn. 2020).
Originating Judge
Chancellor Michael Sharp
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a concurring opinion
Download PDF Version