Phillip C. Penny, Kurtis Schilk, and Robert Tebbetts v. The City of Memphis and City of Memphis Civil Service Commission

Case Number
W2007-00861-COA-R3-CV

This case involves the termination of a municipal police officer. The police department received a report on an attempted suicide by a mental patient. The appellant officer and other officers responded. When the officers arrived at the scene, the suicide victim was sitting on his front porch, bleeding from self-inflicted wounds. As the officers approached the individual, he tried to flee. Attempting to gain control over the individual, the officers repeatedly struck him with their police
batons. The individual ran from the police and fell in the street. The officers again struck him with batons and handcuffed him while he was on the ground. The appellant officer held him on the ground by placing his baton across the back of his shoulders. Shortly afterward, the individual stopped breathing and died of a heart attack. After an investigation, three of the officers, including the appellant, were terminated for using excessive force in this incident. The terminations were upheld by the municipal civil service commission. The three officers then filed a petition for writ of certiorari, claiming that the commission’s decision was arbitrary and unsupported by substantial and material evidence. The trial court granted the petition as to two officers and reversed their terminations. However, it denied the petition as to the appellant officer because his termination was based on his disciplinary history as well as his conduct during the incident in question. The terminated officer now appeals. We affirm, finding that the commission’s decision to uphold the officer’s termination was supported by substantial and material evidence in the record.

Authoring Judge
Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge
Chancellor Arnold B. Goldin
Case Name
Phillip C. Penny, Kurtis Schilk, and Robert Tebbetts v. The City of Memphis and City of Memphis Civil Service Commission
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version