State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle Smith-Dissenting

Case Number
M2013-02818-CCA-R3-CD

I respectfully disagree in the reasoning and result reached in the majority opinion.  The majority opinion concludes that our supreme court’s holding in Brotherton is dispositive and requires that this court affirm the defendant’s conviction.  However, in my view, Brotherton is clearly distinguishable from the instant case.

Authoring Judge
Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge
Judge James G. Martin, III
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle Smith-Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version