Opinions
02C01-9309-CC-00201
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
01A01-9510-CH-00481
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9510-JV-00474
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9510-JV-00479
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CH-00030
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9502-CH-00025
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
01C01-9506-CC-00166
|
Sequatchie | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01A01-9506-JV-00262
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9508-CH-00365
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9509-CH-00318
|
Carter | Court of Appeals | |
03S01-9508-CC-00096
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9508-CC-00096
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9410-CR-00106
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9501-CH-00008
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9502-CH-00018
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9502-CV-00015
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9410-CR-00106
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9503-CC-00035
|
Supreme Court | ||
01C01-9704-CR-00129
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9505-CR-0
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CC-00297
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Terry T. Johnson, v. Michael H. McCommon & MLG & W
This action was brought against Michael McCommon and Memphis Light, Gas, and 2 Water (MLG&W) for personal injuries sustained when McCommon, an employee of MLG&W, struck plaintiff with his vehicle. McCommon was dismissed from the suit prior to trial. Following a bench trial, the lower court held that plaintiff's negligence was greater than that of the defendant and that plaintiff proximately caused her own injuries. Because we do not find that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination, we affirm the judgment dismissing plaintiff's case. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joyce Ann Neal, Individually and as parent and next of kin of the minor child, Brandon Devoris Neal, v. Fayette County Board of Education, Dale Summitt, et al.
This matter arose out of a personal injury action brought against Fayette County 2 Board of Education by plaintiff, Joyce Ann Neal, as parent and next of kin of Brandon Neal, a minor. Brandon, age eleven, was injured while playing basketball when his finger became caught in the goal. Reasoning that the goal was neither dangerous nor defective and that Brandon caused his own injuries through his misuse of the goal, the trial court held in favor of the school board. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination that the goal was not dangerous or defective. Plaintiff further alleges that the trial court erred in failing to find that the school board was negligent. For the reasons stated below, we find these contentions to be without merit; therefore, we affirm the trial court's judgment. |
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
Waymon Frederick Axley, v. Beverly Anne Mallette Axley
After a thirty year marriage,1 Waymon Frederic Axley (Husband) and Beverly Anne Mallette Axley (Wife) were divorced by final decree entered by the trial court in August 1994.2 This appeal concerns the trial court’s award to Wife of $1,500 per month as alimony in futuro and, as additional alimony, $177.62 per month for 36 consecutive months to continue Wife on Husband’s health insurance through his employer. Wife seeks an increase in the award as well as her attorney’s fees for services rendered in this appeal. She frames the issues as follows: I. Did the trial judge err by awarding Wife only $1,500 per month in periodic alimony? II. Should this Court remand this matter to the trial court with the instruction to set a reasonable amount of attorney’s fees for this appeal? |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Waymon Frederic Axley, v. Beverly Anne Mallette Axley
After a thirty year marriage,1 Waymon Frederic Axley (Husband) and Beverly Anne Mallette Axley (Wife) were divorced by final decree entered by the trial court in August 1994.2 This appeal concerns the trial court’s award to Wife of $1,500 per month as alimony in futuro and, as additional alimony, $177.62 per month for 36 consecutive months to continue Wife on Husband’s health insurance through his employer. Wife seeks an increase in the award as well as her attorney’s fees for services rendered in this appeal. She frames the issues as follows: |
Shelby | Court of Appeals |