State vs. LaKeith Lightfoot
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Doyle Hart
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Joe Russell
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Eronia Neal
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Tommy Horton Tate vs. State
|
Morgan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Maurice Johnson
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles Orren vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CR-00507
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Billy Aldridge vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kenneth Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kevin Hyman & Karen Russell
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Raymond Jones
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Steven Culps
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rickey Nelson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Jones
|
Van Buren | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Holbrooks
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Timothy Brown
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Christopher Parker
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Judy Leath
|
Macon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Harry Reed
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Mark Rawlings
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darwin Windham
|
Weakley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gaylen Rhodes
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles O'Guinn v. State of Tennessee
Charles Ray O’Quinn, the petitioner, appeals pursuant to Rule 3, Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. On July 27, 1989, the petitioner pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated rape. The offenses occurred in April or May, and in June, 1988. He received Range II sentences of 35 years in the aggregate. The petitioner contends that his convictions for aggravated rape are void because the indictment failed to allege the mens rea for that offense. See State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App., Nashville, June 20, 1996), rev'd, 954 S.W.2d 725 (Tenn. 1997). |
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Stephen Udzinski and Donna Stokes a/k/a Donna Story
The defendants, Stephen J. Udzinski and Donna Stokes a/k/a Donna Story, present a certified question of law following Udzinski’s conditional guilty plea to a Class E felony of possession of marijuana for resale and Stokes’s guilty plea to a Class A misdemeanor for possession of marijuana. Udzinski entered judicial diversion, and Stokes received a conviction and a suspended sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days. Both defendants attempted to reserve the right to pursue a certified question of law of whether the search warrant under which Udzinski's house was searched was supported by probable cause. In this appeal, the defendants present that question, and the state raises the issue of whether the defendants have properly preserved the question for our review. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court on the suppression issue raised by the defendants’ certified question. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals |
