State of Tennessee v. Albert R. Neese - Concurring and Dissenting

Case Number
M2005-00752-CCA-R3-CD

I concur in the results and most of the reasoning in the majority opinion. I disagree, however, with the opinion’s conclusion that the trial court properly instructed the jury that the culpable mental state of recklessness would satisfy the unlawful sexual penetration element in the offense of child rape.

Authoring Judge
Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge
Judge Monte D. Watkins
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Albert R. Neese - Concurring and Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version