Opinions

Livingston, et. al. vs. Upper Cumberland Human
01A01-9609-CV-00391

Trial Court Judge: John A. Turnbull

Young vs. Young
01A01-9609-CV-00415

Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Loria vs. Loria
01A01-9609-CH-00441

Trial Court Judge: Cornelia A. Clark

03C01-9512-CC-00382
03C01-9512-CC-00382

Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

03C01-9511-CR-00353
03C01-9511-CR-00353

Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

03C01-9512-CC-00415
03C01-9512-CC-00415

Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

03C01-9602-CR-00083
03C01-9602-CR-00083

Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

03C01-9602-CR-00061
03C01-9602-CR-00061

Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

03C01-9603-CC-00087
03C01-9603-CC-00087

Trial Court Judge: Frank L. Slaughter

02C01-9605-CC-00144
02C01-9605-CC-00144

Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Relying In Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim.
02C01-9702-CC-00072

In Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App.
02C01-9702-CC-00058

02C01-9604-CC-00132
02C01-9604-CC-00132

Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

02A01-9606-CH-00144
02A01-9606-CH-00144

02a01-9605-CH-00101
02a01-9605-CH-00101

Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

02C01-9603-CR-00109
02C01-9603-CR-00109

Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

03S01-9603-CC-00023
03S01-9603-CC-00023

03S01-9603-CV-00032
03S01-9603-CV-00032

03A01-9609-CV-00289
03A01-9609-CV-00289

Terry Jamar Norris v. Tony Parker, Warden
W2007-00594-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Lue Ann Smith, v. Winchester City Council, et. al.
01A01-9609-CV-00419
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. Curtis Smith

This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Lue Ann Smith, from an order of the Franklin County Circuit Court quashing her writ of certiorari. The writ suspended the decisions of respondent/appellee, the Winchester City Council (“the Council”), allowing intervening petitioner, Karl Smith, permission and denying Appellant permission to sell fire works within the City of Winchester. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows.

Tennessee Consumer Advocate, v. Tennessee Regulatory Authority and United Cities Gas Company
01A01-9606-BC-00286
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd

The petitioner, Tennessee Consumer Advocate, has petitioned this Court for review of administrative decisions of the Tennessee Public Services Commission pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 12. By order entered by this Court on October 3, 1996, the review is limited to an order entered by the Commission on May 3, 1996. However, the circumstances stated hereafter require reference to an order previously entered by the Tennessee Public Service Commission on May 12, 1995.

William Depriest, Gates-Pate-McDaniel, Henry H Headden, Joel P. Morris, Maurice Pinson, Richard R. Standel, Jr., and W.O. Vaughan, Jr., v. 1717-19 West End Associates., et. al
01A01-9609-CH-00428
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

The captioned plaintiffs have appealed from the summary dismissal of their various claims by the trial court. The various claims and defenses on appeal arose from a failed investment scheme, and are illustrated by the following issues presented by the parties:

IN RE: Estate of Foster Hume, III; The University of the South v. Meredith Klank - Concurring
01A01-9609-PB-00432
Authoring Judge: Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.

The University of the South, residuary legatee under the will of Foster Hume, deceased, has appealed from the judgment of the Probate Court holding that a specific devise to Meredith Klank was not extinguished by ademption and therefore the subject of the specific devise did not become a part of the residuary estate.

Frank McNeil, MD. and Janet McNeil, M.D., et. ux. v. Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners - Concurring
01A01-9608-CH-00383
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.

The orders handed down by the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners on March 6, 1995 can stand only if the board’s conclusions are supported by substantial and material evidence. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-5-322(h)(5) (Supp. 1996). Cases of this sort require either admissions by the accused physician, Williams v. State Dep’t of Health & Env’t, 880 S.W.2d 955, 958 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994), or expert proof concerning the standard of professional conduct alleged to have been violated. Williams v. Tennessee Bd. of Medical Examiners, App. No. 01A01-9402-CH-00060, 1994 WL 420910, at *6-8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 1994) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed).