02C01-9601-CR-00020
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Victor Reynolds
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Hardin
|
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Bobby Anderson
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. William Bell
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Joe Patrick Sr.
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9608-CC-00283
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Tony Higgs
|
Hardeman | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Heather Dowdy
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Loftus vs. Loftus, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Tennessee Teachers Credit Union vs. Orr
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State., ex. rel. Shaver vs. Shaver
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Laney vs. Campbell, Commissioner
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Rudy Rogers vs. Gerald & Tony Young
|
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-611-CV-00267
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Fred Dean vs. Donal Campbell, et al
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Jenkins vs. Jenkins
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Southeast Drilling & Blasting Services vs. BRS Construction Co.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Curtis vs. Curtis
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Droussoitis vs. Damrron, et. al.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Reliance Insurance Co. vs. WSN Leasing, Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Tomlin, a minor., et. al. vs. Warren,
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Gray
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mid-State Trust, IV v. Randall W. Swift
This is an appeal by defendant/appellant, Randall W. Swift, from the decision of the Cheatham County Circuit Court dismissing his appeal from the general sessions court. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows |
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Shirley Jean McCracken and Alan McCracken, et. al., v. Brentwood United Methodist Church
This appeal involves a woman who broke both ankles in a fall at church. The woman and her husband filed suit in the Circuit Court for Williamson County against the church and others. The trial court granted the church’s motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations and the joint enterprise rule.The woman and her husband perfected this appeal after obtaining post-judgment relief from an inappropriate interlocutory appeal. We have determined that the trial court properly granted the post-judgment relief but erred in summarily dismissing the complaint. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals |