Nancy M. Cronin v. John W. Howe, M.D.
The issue in this appeal is whether the Tennessee savings statute1operates to save a medical malpractice action which was initially filed within the three-year statute of repose, but which was voluntarily dismissed and refiled beyond the three-year statute of repose.2 We hold that it does. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. |
Supreme Court | ||
01C01-9409-CC-00325
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9401-CR-00027
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9410-CC-00236
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9502-CC-00054
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9501-CC-00018
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cyril v. Fraser
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9502-CR-00048
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9501-CR-00011
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9501-CR-00026
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
40-35-303(A). It Relied Upon The Reasoning In State v. Hicks, 848 S.W.2D 69 (Tenn.
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C0l-94l0-CR-002l7
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
First American National Bank, v. J.M.D. Bransford
This is an appeal by defendant, J.M.D. Bransford, from the trial court's granting of the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff, First American National Bank (Bank), and resulting judgment in the bank's favor on a promissory note made by defendant Bransford as a co-maker. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02S01-9406-CH-00027
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9401-CR-00095
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9407-CH-00067
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9502-CR-00011
|
Supreme Court | ||
03C01-9406-CR-00231
|
Washington | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Stephen Patterson vs. Susan Patterson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03S01-9401-CR-00095
|
Supreme Court | ||
Casa Juvenile Services Association, Inc. and Tennessee Department of Human Services v. Loretta NMN Phillips Arrietta and Florencia Arrietta Salgado, in re Dustin Matthew Arrietta
Loretta Phillips Arrietta, mother of Dustin Matthew Arrietta, appeals a judgment of the Juvenile Court for Hamblen County which terminated her parental rights. |
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jerrell C. Livingston, State of Tennessee v. Steve Bundy, State of Tennessee v. John R. Tilley, & State of Tennessee v. David Johnson
We accepted the application for review filed pursuant to Rule 11, Tenn. R. App.P. In these four cases in order to determine whether the fresh-complaint doctrine recently modified in State v. Kendricks 1 applies in cases wherein a child is the victim of abuse. For the reasons below appearing, we hold that the fresh-complaint doctrine does not apply in such cases.
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines
This defendant was convicted of murder in the perpetration of armed robbery and sentenced to death. On direct appeal this Court affirmed defendant's conviction and remanded the case for resentencing because of erroneous jury instructions. |
Cheatham | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines
This defendant was convicted of murder in the perpetration of armed robbery and sentenced to death. On direct appeal this Court affirmed defendant's conviction and remanded the case for resentencing because of erroneous jury instructions.1 |
Cheatham | Supreme Court | |
Misty Atchley v. Lifecare Center of Cleveland
We granted review of the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel decision pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(5)(A), in order to determine, inter alia, whether the provisions contained in Tenn. Code Ann. § 50- 6-241(a)(1) [the multiplier statute], limiting an employee's permanent partial disability award to two and one-half (2½) times the medical impairment rating in cases in which the pre-injury employer returns the employee to employment at awage equal to or greater than the wage the employee was receiving at the time of the injury, apply to injuries involving scheduled members |
Bradley | Supreme Court |