Hampton vs. TN. Truck Sales, Inc.
01A01-9711-CH-00640
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Davidson Court of Appeals

Bickford vs. Bickford
01A01-9711-CH-00645

Rutherford Court of Appeals

State vs. Frederick Edwards
02C01-9704-CC-00157

Weakley Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Jon Hall
02C01-9703-CC-00095
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

Madison Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Harry McLemore
02C01-9711-CC-00436

Lauderdale Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. James McClenton
02C01-9710-CR-00385

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. James Crawford
02C01-9712-CR-00471

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

Hoffman vs. Hoffman
03A01-9706-CV-00220

Hamilton Court of Appeals

03A01-9708-CV-00377
03A01-9708-CV-00377

Court of Appeals

Calkins vs. Calkins
03A01-9709-CH-00413

Sevier Court of Appeals

Greenman vs. Hutchins
03A01-9709-CV-00404

Court of Appeals

Spencer vs. Hutchison
03A01-9712-CV-00522

Court of Appeals

IN RE: Swanay
03A01-9712-PB-00542
Trial Court Judge: Inman

Court of Appeals

State vs. McKee
03C01-9603-CR-00092

Court of Criminal Appeals

Jarrett vs. Starkey
03A01-9706-JV-00223

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Pritchett vs. Pritchett
03A01-9708-CH-00362

Sullivan Court of Appeals

Swoffard vs. Del Pino-McClarty
03A01-9707-CV-00454

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Branum vs. Akins
03A01-9709-CH-00418

Hamilton Court of Appeals

State vs. Kelani Mayer
W1999-00613-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

Henry Court of Criminal Appeals

Earhart vs. City of Bristol
03S01-9709-CH-00116

Supreme Court

State vs. Cattone
03S01-9706-CR-00075
Trial Court Judge: Mayo L. Mashburn

Supreme Court

State vs. Byrd
03S01-9705-CR-00057
Trial Court Judge: Rex Henry Ogle

Supreme Court

State vs. Byrd
03S01-9705-CR-00057
Trial Court Judge: Rex Henry Ogle

Supreme Court

Earhart vs. City of Bristol
03S01-9709-CH-00116

Supreme Court

Pam Ogren v. Housecall Health Care, Inc.
03S01-9706-CH-00078
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Frank V. Williams,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had sustained a 7 percent permanent vocational impairment as a result of an on-the-job injury. The defendant says the evidence preponderates against the award of 7 percent and says the trial judge should have limited the award to 2.5 times the medical impairment rating because the plaintiff failed to return to work when she was afforded a job within her medical limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The undisputed evidence shows the plaintiff was injured on December 16, 1994 as she performed her duties as a certified nursing assistant for the defendant. The plaintiff was assisting a paraplegic patient to dress at the time of the injury. The patient had raised himself on a trapeze bar by his arms and the plaintiff was attempting to dress his lower body. The base of the bar moved onto the plaintiff's left shoe. The plaintiff pushed on the bar to free her foot. The plaintiff heard a "pop" in her left shoulder and began to experience pain in her neck, shoulder, arm, and hand. It appears the plaintiff had some medical care at Athens Community Hospital; however, there is little in the record concerning this treatment. On March 27, 1995, the plaintiff was seen by Joel B. Ragland, a neurosurgeon in Knoxville. Dr. Ragland conducted examination and testing and found the plaintiff had a rather large disc rupture at C5-6 and C6-7. Dr. Ragland concluded surgery was required for the plaintiff's injury and this was done on April 21, 1995. Dr. Ragland did an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion on the effected vertebrae. Dr. Ragland continued to see the plaintiff until October 1995 at which time he released her and found she had suffered a ten percent medical impairment to the body as a whole. Dr. Ragland was of the opinion the plaintiff could return to work with a ten pound lifting restriction. 2

Knox Workers Compensation Panel