Sinclair vs. State of TN
01A01-9901-BC-00018

01C01-9808-CR-00322
01C01-9808-CR-00322
Trial Court Judge: Steve R. Dozier

Alvin L. Smith, Jr. vs. State
01C01-9808-CC-00343
Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee

Daniel L. Sanders vs. State
01C01-9712-CC-00586

Richard Waline vs. State
01C01-9805-CR-00199
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

State vs. James E. Frazier
01C01-9801-CC-00036
Trial Court Judge: J. S. Daniel

State vs. Jason Kennedy Frazier
01C01-9812-CC-00484

State vs. Danny Lynn Porter
03C01-9811-CR-00393
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

State vs. David Proffitt
03C01-9901-CR-00026
Trial Court Judge: Leon C. Burns, Jr.

State of Tennessee v. Albert Dewaynn Porter - Concurring
02S01-9803-CC-000205
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Trial Court Judge: Judge C. Creed McGinley

We granted this appeal to determine whether the common law "procuring agent defense" has been abolished by statute. We hold that the procuring agent defense was abolished by Tenn. Code Ann. §39-11-203 (e)(2) which expressly states that "[d]efenses available under common law are here by abolished." The trial court appropriately declined to instruct the jury on the procuring agent defense, and the defendant's conviction for selling a controlled substance was supported by the evidence.

Ricky Myers v. Carrier Corporation
01S01-9810-CH-00183
Authoring Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Jefferey Stewart

Monika Pelis v. Precision Printing & Packaging
01S01-9809-CH-00160
Authoring Judge: Henry Denmark Bell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Robert W. Wedemeyer

John Darren Welker v. Bridgestone/Firestone
01S01-9810-CH-00192
Authoring Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Robert E. Corlew

Allen Dale Jarvis v. Nissan Motor Mfg Corp.
01S01-9810-CH-00186
Authoring Judge: Henry Denmark Bell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. James L . Weatherford

James E. Rainey v. Micro Craft, Inc., et al
01S01-9805-CH-00106
Authoring Judge: Henry Denmark Bell, Retired Judge

Betty Jo Reeves v. Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., et al
01S01-9806-CH-00115
Authoring Judge: Thomas W. Brothers, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Donald P. Harris

Roger Lee Dailey v. Ez Loader Boat Trailers, et al
01S01-9805-CH-00101
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Jeffrey Stewart

Jody Maynard Falk v. Saturn Corp.
01S01-9805-CH-00105
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William B. Cain

Timothy Gene Green v. Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance & Fleetwood
01S01-9806-CV-00113
Authoring Judge: Henry Denmark Bell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Bobb Y Capers

Don Brunetti v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Williamson County, et al. - Concurring
01A01-9803-CV-00120
Authoring Judge: Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge Henry Denmark Bell

This is an appeal of the trial court’s affirmance, in a writ of certiorari action, of a decision of the Williamson County Board of Zoning Appeals interpreting and applying provisions of the Williamson County Zoning Ordinance. The Appellant, Mr. Brunetti, is a neighbor of Mr. Brian Sanders, and objects to the operation of two grain bins (sometimes referred to as silos) on Mr. Sanders’s 5-acre parcel in Williamson County, which is zoned “Estate.” The Board of Zoning Appeals interpreted state statute and local  ordinance to allow this “agricultural” use. We affirm.

Joanne Thompson Barrett v. Marilyn Young Hill - Concurring
01A01-9806-CV-00295
Authoring Judge: Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert E. Corlew

This case involves a dispute between neighbors over a sewer line. The Defendant, Marilyn Hill, appeals the trial court’s finding of an easement by  implication in favor of the Plaintiff, Joanne Barrett, across Ms. Hill’s property for the purpose of connecting Ms. Barrett’s property to the city sewer line. We affirm the trial court.

William Jones v. Jeff Reynolds, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction
01A01-9809-CH-00499
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Carol L. McCoy

Plaintiff William Jones appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction in this dispute over the Department’s calculation of Jones’ sentence reduction credits. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Catherine Edmundson v. Jimmy C.Grisham, d/b/a Germantown Pest Control, Germantown Termite & Pest Conrol, Inc., et al., - Concurring
02A01-9810-CV-00298
Authoring Judge: Judge Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Karen R. Williams

Defendants Jimmy C. Grisham, d/b/a Germantown Pest Control, Germantown Termite and Pest Control, Inc., and Christopher D. Alexander appeal the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of  Plaintiff/Appellee Catherine Edmundson in the amount of $50,000. We  affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Steven Cobb v. Charles Wilson, et al.
02A01-9811-CV-00308
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph H. Walker, III

Steven Cobb appeals from the dismissal of his pro se complaint against Charles Wilson, Evelyn Scallions, and Steve Vaughn. The complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleged violations of Cobb’s rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

State of Tennessee vs. James Tyrone Harbison
03C01-9808-CR-00271
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge Douglas A. Meyer

The defendant, James Tyrone Harbison, was convicted in 1997 of aggravated assault and sentenced as a Range III persistent offender to fourteen years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102. In this appeal, the defendant presents the following issues: (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding of “serious bodily injury” as an aggravating factor of the defendant’s convicted offense; (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting testimony that the defendant had been released from prison immediately preceeding the instant offense; (3) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on reckless endangerment as a lesser offense; (4) whether the defendant’s sentence is excessive; and (5) whether the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as a Range III persistent offender. We AFFIRM the judgment from the trial court.