Charles McDonald vs. Dixie White Ishee
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Beatrice Holiday vs. Shoneys South
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs.Robert A. Norris & Lida A. Meador
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Miltier, III vs. Miltier (Buhls)
|
Carter | Court of Appeals | |
Steven C. Mohn, et ux vs. Bernard Graff, et al
|
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
D. A. Price vs. P. C. Price
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Wielgus vs. Dover Industries
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. England
|
Sumner | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Dennis R. England
|
Sumner | Supreme Court | |
Chadwell vs. Chadwell
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Speakman vs. Ada Ferrell Garden Apts.
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Heather Johnson
|
White | Court of Appeals | |
In re: Appalachian School of Law
|
Supreme Court | ||
Berryhill vs. Rhodes
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
Berryhill vs. Rhodes
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
Barnes vs. Goodyear
|
Obion | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Murriel Lee
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Larry W. Barnes v. The Goodyear Tire And Rubber
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
Ronald & Bonnie Warf vs. Wayne Vincent
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Tammy C. Powell vs. Charley Crisp, et al
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Edward Talmadge Mcconnell
|
Washington | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
21812-COA-R3-CV
|
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Brown
T he D efendant w as indicted for one count of agg ravated robbery and one count of theft over $1,000. He w as subsequently tried by a T ipton C ounty jury and found guilty of aggravated robbery and theft over $500. In this appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing introduction of an involuntary statement which he made to police following his arrest, by failing to grant his motion for new trial on the basis of insufficient evidence, and by sentencing him incorrectly. We hold that the trial court did not err by admitting the Defendant’ s statement to police, that the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction, and that the Defendant was properly sentenced. Accordingly , we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Diallo Lauderdale
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Thomas Gregory v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins.
|
Sumner | Workers Compensation Panel |