State, ex rel., Shem Peter Malmquist v. Danielle Nicolosi Malmquist

Case Number
W2017-00893-COA-R3-JV

In this post-divorce dispute, the mother, a California resident, asked the court to modify a Tennessee child support order. At the hearing before the magistrate, the mother agreed to a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. But later she asked the juvenile court for a rehearing. At the request of both parties, the juvenile court then directed the magistrate to hold another hearing on the mother’s motion. At the new hearing, the magistrate denied the mother’s request to testify by telephone. And, because no one present was ready to proceed, the magistrate also dismissed the notice of rehearing. On appeal, the mother argues that she was entitled to testify by telephone under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude that the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act did not apply to her request to modify a Tennessee child support order. We further conclude that the record does not support her claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. So we affirm.

Authoring Judge
Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge
Judge Dan H. Michael
Case Name
State, ex rel., Shem Peter Malmquist v. Danielle Nicolosi Malmquist
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version