Reginald Dion Hughes v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole (Dissent)

Case Number
M2015-00722-SC-R11-CV

The Court bars Mr. Hughes’s access to the courthouse based on its interpretation of Tennessee Code Annotated sections 41-21-801 to -818, an act that adopted procedures and penalties for prison inmates who file frivolous or malicious lawsuits. As noted by the Court, the purpose of this act was to “offset the tide of frivolous inmate litigation filtering through the court system.” Under this act, a trial court may dismiss an inmate’s claim upon a finding that the claim is frivolous or malicious or if the inmate has previously filed three or more claims found to be frivolous or malicious. The specific section at issue is section 41-21-812(a), which provides that “on notice of assessment of any fees, taxes, costs and expenses under this part, a clerk of a court may not accept for filing another claim by the same inmate until prior fees, taxes, costs and other expenses are paid in full.” Id. (emphasis added).

Authoring Judge
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge
Chancellor Ellen H. Lyle
Case Name
Reginald Dion Hughes v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole (Dissent)
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version