Case Number
M2005-01757-COA-R3-CV
I cannot concur in the conclusion of the majority opinion, i.e., that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s judgment designating the husband as the primary residential parent of the parties’ minor children. My review of the record persuades me that the trial court went against the overwhelming weight of the evidence favoring an award of primary custody to the wife for one reason and one reason only, i.e., because of the wife’s admitted adulterous relationship during the marriage. I believe the trial court premised its decision on an incorrect interpretation of the law and/or made a factually-erroneous decision.
Originating Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Case Name
Kevin Kham Fongnaly v. Vienqrhone Vickie Fongnaly - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
FongnalykDIS.pdf19.32 KB