Case Number
E2010-01052-COA-R3-CV
Louise Helen Hindman (“Wife”) and Tommy K. Hindman (“Husband”) were divorced in August of 1997, at which time the trial court approved a marital dissolution agreement (“the MDA”) submitted by the parties. Relevant to the instant case, the MDA addressed future medical and educational expenses for the parties’ minor child (“Son”). After Wife refused to reimburse Husband in compliance with the pertinent provisions of the MDA, he filed a petition seeking to have her held in contempt. The trial court ultimately ordered Wife to pay $43,678. We affirm.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Daryl R. Fansler
Case Name
Tommy K. Hindman vs. Louise Helen Hindman
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
hindmanopn.pdf803.09 KB