Case Number
E2001-00584-SC-R11-CD
Although I concur in the analysis and holding of the majority, I write to address an issue of concern: whether in today’s society a parent’s right to corporally chastise a refractory child survives, and, if so, how does one reconcile that right with the child abuse statutes as currently written and interpreted. It is my intention by this concurring opinion to raise the level of discussion and to provide, perhaps, a measure of guidance for the trial court on remand.
Originating Judge
Judge Stephen M. Bevil
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Anderson Toliver - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
ToliverC.pdf13.24 KB