State vs. Johnny Davis
|
Campbell | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Hunt
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Mark Grimes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Marvin Matthews
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Burton Welch
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Alvin Featherstone vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Taurys Walls
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Evid., And Mcdaniel v. Csx Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2D 257 (Tenn. 1997). The
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Collier vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bidwell
|
Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Griffis
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Johnny Davidson
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Eddie Coley
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Eddie Coley
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Danny King
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Kelly
|
Warren | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Dixon
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Sweat
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Martin
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bivens
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs Ricky Bryan
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rachel Green
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Edward Anthony Joslin
A jury found the defendant guilty of conspiracy to possess with the intent to deliver over seventy pounds of marijuana; two counts of possession with the intent to deliver one-half ounce to ten pounds of marijuana; and delivery of ten pounds, one gram to seventy pounds of marijuana. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of thirtynine years incarceration, with a total fine of one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000). On appeal, the defendant presents ten issues for review, most of which deal with the sufficiency of the convicting evidence or the propriety of the defendant’s sentence. We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentence. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Michael Orman
The defendant was found guilty by a Davidson County jury of burglary and theft of property over $1,000. The trial court sentenced defendant to Range II sentences of six years on each count and ordered them served consecutively for an effective twelve-year sentence. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in finding and weighing the enhancement and mitigating factors and in ordering the sentences served consecutively instead of concurrently. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the sentence as imposed. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |