Case Number
M2025-01299-CCA-R3-CD
I write separately because I reach a different conclusion than the majority as to the appropriate response to the trial court’s deficiency. I agree that the trial court failed to make sufficient findings on the record regarding the grounds on which it found that the Defendant violated the terms of his probation. However, I disagree that a de novo review of the record supports a conclusion that the Defendant committed a technical violation rather than absconding. I will endeavor to briefly explain my reasoning.
Originating Judge
Judge Michael E. Spitzer
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version