Case Number
W2017-02179-CCA-R3-CD
Respectfully, I disagree with the majority opinion’s conclusions that the victim’s testimony regarding the cost of the repairs to his car was inadmissible hearsay and that admission of this evidence necessitates a new trial for the vandalism conviction.
Originating Judge
Judge Lee V. Coffee
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Marcellus Hurt Dissent in Part/Concur in Part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
hurtmarcellusdis.pdf93.49 KB