The Defendant, Santory Alexander Johnson, was convicted by a jury of one count of second degree murder. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial or issue an adequate curative instruction following prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments; (2) the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify about statements made by the victim; (3) the trial court erred in allowing a redacted convenience store video to be entered into evidence; (4) the trial court erred in re-playing a 9-1-1 recording already admitted into evidence; (5) the trial court erred in allowing inflammatory autopsy photographs to be entered as evidence; (6) the cumulative effect of these evidentiary errors was not harmless; and (7) the trial court erred in failing to properly consider mitigating factors at the Defendant’s sentencing hearing.1 Following our review, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
Case Number
              E2017-00361-CCA-R3-CD
          Originating Judge
              Judge Thomas C. Greenholtz
          Case Name
              State of Tennessee v. Santory Alexander Johnson
          Date Filed
              Dissent or Concur
              No
          Download PDF Version
              santory_johnson_opinion.pdf167.61 KB
           
                                  



