Frank Robert Bigsby v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
M2002-02260-CCA-R3-PC
I write separately because I believe that in this instance the post-conviction court's failure to make specific findings of fact does not preclude appellate review. Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-211 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:(b) Upon the final disposition of every petition, the court shall enter a final order, and except where proceedings for delayed appeal are allowed, shall set forth in the order or a written memorandum of the case all grounds presented, and shall state the findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard to each such ground.
Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge
Judge James K. Clayton, Jr.
Case Name
Frank Robert Bigsby v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
BigsbyD.pdf32.89 KB