COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Joseph Anthony Gannon and Gloria C. Gannon, et. al., v. Robert Koch and Deborah Koch, et. al.
01A01-9708-CH-00404
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Alex W. Darnell

The defendants, Robert and Deborah Koch, have appealed from a non jury judgment that plaintiffs, Joseph and Gloria Gannon, have a private easement from their land across the land of
defendants for access to the public way.

Patty M. Richards v. O'Connor Management, Incorporated and Russ Hackett
01A01-9708-CV-00379
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Barbara N. Haynes

Plaintiff Patty M. Richards appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants/Appellees O’Connor Management, Inc., and Russ Hackett.In entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, the trial court dismissed Richards’ claims for outrageous conduct and false imprisonment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Steven Cobb v. Joseph Vinson, Chairman LCRCF Disciplinary Board, et al. - Separately Concurring
02A01-9707-CV-00144
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard

I agree with the majority’s analysis in this case. However, I concur separately to emphasize
that our review, under either the common law writ of certiorari or the statutory writ, should be
limited to hearing the petitioner’s claims regarding “the illegality of acts taken by the disciplinary
board.” Williams v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction, No. 02A01-9503-CV-00046 1995 WL 575142
(Tenn. App. Oct. 2 1995). Even if the requirements of a statutory writ of certiorari are met, our
review should not include the substance of the disciplinary proceeding, i.e. whether the petitioner
actually committed the acts with which he was charged.
 

Robert Utley v. Robert Orr-Sysco
M2000-02904-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes
This is a premises liability case. The plaintiff was shopping in a store owned by the defendant when the plaintiff slipped and fell on a clear liquid substance and sustained personal injuries. The plaintiff shopper sued the defendant store owner on a theory of premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff now appeals. We affirm, finding that the plaintiff submitted insufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the store had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition prior to the plaintiff's fall.

Isom vs. Knox Co.
03A01-9708-CH-00333

03A01-9708-CH-00376
03A01-9708-CH-00376

Lucas vs. Lucas
03A01-9707-CV-00298

Peele vs. Earl
03A01-9707-CV-00244

Casa vs. Musick
03A01-9708-JV-00368

Moody vs.Dist. Public Defenders Conference
01A01-9707-CH-00311
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Waters vs. Layne
01A01-9708-CV-00402
Trial Court Judge: Buddy D. Perry

Moody vs.Dist. Public Defenders Conference
01A01-9707-CH-00311

Beck vs. Beck, Jr.
01A01-9710-CV-00547
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Charles Dorse vs. Martin Kriger
02A01-9712-CH-00315

Estate of Bessie Holmes, Deceased
02A01-9707-PB-00158
Trial Court Judge: Leonard D. Pierotti

In the Matter of: Jamie, Janet & Jhanaid Murphy
02A01-9610-CV-00259
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

H.W. Jenkins Co. vs. G.T. Designs
02A01-9707-CH-00170
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Rice vs. Rice
03A01-9709-CV-00415

Shankel vs. Morris
03A01-9710-CV-00478

Buford vs. Buford
03A01-9710-CV-00445

Martin vs. Martin
03A01-9708-GS-00323

Swiggett vs. Ogle
03A01-9709-CH-00430

Norman vs. Norman
03A01-9702-CV-00047

Edwards vs. State
03A01-9707-CV-00302

Wharton vs. Wharton
03A01-9707-CH-00267