COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Long, et. ux. vs. Landmark Television of TN
01A01-9709-CV-00483
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Fagg vs. County of Franklin
01A01-9710-CV-00589
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Graham

John Du Ban vs. Gary Wilkinson
02A01-9712-CV-00314
Trial Court Judge: Karen R. Williams

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Trial Court Judge: Chester S. Rainwater

07-93-017-CC
07-93-017-CC

Ardie Trice vs. David Hall, et al
02A01-9708-CV-00195
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

Commercial Credit vs. Est. of Arthur Smith, et al
02A01-9708-CH-00204
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Barbara Pierce vs. State
02A01-9710-BC-00245

Phares vs. Myatt
01A01-9709-CV-00485
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Wortham vs. West Meade Corp.
01A01-9709-CV-00464
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Burch

Cathy P. Sprayberry-Gravitt, v. David Baker, Director of Schools for the Clarksville-Montgomery County Schools, et al.
01A01-9707-CH-00295
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd

We have reviewed appellee's Petition to Rehear. Counsel correctly points out that the Education Improvement Act of 1992 specified certain duties in the County Administration of education. The two sections cited [T.C.A. 49-2- 301(f)(10) and T.C.A. 49-2-203(a)(1)] do refer to "recommendation" of the superintendent to the local board of education. It is the duty of the superintendent to recommend teachers who qualify and the board "elects" such teachers to tenure status as it deems appropriate.

Est. of William Burton, Jr., Deceased
01A01-9708-PB-00434
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

England & Whitley vs. Select Sires
01A01-9705-CV-00204

Wilder vs. Rains
01A01-9709-CV-00519
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.

Waddey vs. Waddey
01A01-9708-CV-00374
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Montague vs. Dept. of Corrections
01A01-9711-CH-00667

National Healthcare L.P. vs. Sparta Medical Investors
01A01-9712-CH-00718

In the Matter of Tiffany Harrell & Matthew Miller (In the matter of T.J.H.)
01A01-9712-CH-00736
Trial Court Judge: Leonard W. Martin

Harpeth Valley Utilities Dist. vs. Metro Gov't
01A01-9711-CH-00686
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

G.E. Capital vs. Belinda Young
W1998-00729-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: John R. Mccarroll, Jr.

Godfrey vs. Godfrey
03A01-9708-CH-00319
Trial Court Judge: Frederick D. Mcdonald

Judith Ann Warren Taylor, v. Michael Raymond Taylor
02A01-9706-CV-00112
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Janice M. Holder

Judith Ann Taylor (“Wife”) filed a complaint for divorce against Michael Raymond Taylor (“Husband”) and also sought an injunction prohibiting Husband from dissipating marital assets. Husband filed an answer and counter-complaint for divorce. The trial court granted Wife the divorce on the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct and awarded her rehabilitative alimony, partial attorney fees, and 60% of the marital assets. Husband appeals and raises the following issues:whether the trial court erred (1) in awarding Wife rehabilitative alimony of $1,300 per month for 60 months; (2) in ordering Husband to pay $20,000 as alimony in solido for Wife’s attorney fees; (3) in ordering Husband to pay a portion of Wife’s health insurance coverage; (4) in requiring Husband to maintain a life insurance policy which exceeds the total amount of child support owed; and (5) in dividing the marital property of the parties. Wife submits the additional issue of whether she is due attorney fees on appeal. For the reasons stated below, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects.

Norman Mayes, et ux., v. Claude Yow, et ux., and William Scarboro, et ux.
03A01-9706-CV-00203
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Harold Wimberly

This appeal results from a suit brought by Normal Mayes and his wife, Ruth Mayes, against Claude Yow and his wife, Frances Yow, Willard Scarbro and his wife, Cleo Scarbro, who was added as a party Defendant subsequent to the filing of the original complaint, and Partners & Associates, Inc.

Villages of Brentwood Homeowners' Association, Inc., v. Steven J. Westermann and wife Maria A. Westermann
01A01-9708-CH-00388
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle

This appeal involves the enforcement of the restrictive covenants in a Nashville subdivision. After two residents began to construct improvements on their property without first obtaining approval of the subdivision’s architectural committee, the homeowners association filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking injunctive relief to enforce the architectural control provisions in the subdivision’s restrictive covenants. The trial court heard the case without a jury and issued an injunction directing the residents to cease the construction and to restore their property to a condition consistent with the subdivision covenants. The residents have appealed. Since neither party has filed a verbatim transcript of the proceedings or a statement of the evidence, we have reviewed the papers filed in the trial court and have determined that they contain no basis for reversing the trial court. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Michael A. Thompson v. Tennessee Board of Paroles, et al.
01A01-9710-CH-00572
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Michael A. Thompson, a prisoner in the custody of Tennessee Department of Correction has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his petition for certiorari for judicial review of a decision of the Tennessee Board of Paroles denying parole.