Case Number
M2012-01807-COA-R3-CV
Based on the application of Rule 6.02 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure to the facts of this case, I must respectfully dissent from the majority. While the majority concludes that Father’s petition is barred by his failure to timely file his petition in opposition to the relocation, I would instead remand to the trial court for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issue of whether Father’s delay in filing his petition was the result of excusable neglect.
Originating Judge
Judge Joe Binkley, Jr.
Case Name
Thomas Goodman Rutherford v. Melodey Joice Lawson Rutherford - Dissent
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
rutherford_t._dissent_opn.pdf114.15 KB