APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Danny Middleton v. Porcelain Products Company

E2000-01464-WC-R3-CV
The employee appeals and contends the trial court erred (1) in finding his medical impairment to be eleven percent instead of eighteen percent to the body, (2) in concluding that he has employment opportunities available locally, and (3) in failing to consider economic feasibility in determining local employment opportunities. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Howell N. Peoples, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Daryl Fansler, Chancellor
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 06/25/01
State of Tennessee v. Kenneth S. Griffin

E2000-02471-CCA-R3-CD

Defendant, Kenneth Griffin, was found guilty of burglary (Class D) and theft (Class D) following a bench trial. He was sentenced as a career offender on each conviction to twelve (12) years incarceration, and the sentences were ordered to be served consecutively. The Defendant, with counsel, appealed the conviction raising the sole issue of the sufficiency of the evidence. This court affirmed. State v. Kenneth S. Griffin, C.C.A. No. 03C01-9811-CR-00406, 1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1316, Knox County (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Dec. 27, 1999). Subsequently, Defendant timely filed a petition for post-conviction relief alleging, apparently among other issues, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal because appellate counsel did not raise as an issue the consecutive sentencing ordered by the trial court. The post-conviction court, in a written order, granted Defendant a "delayed appeal" as "authorized under TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED SECTION. 40-30-213." The post-conviction court's order limited the delayed appeal to the sole issue "of the correctness of [defendant's] sentence." However, the post-conviction court, while impliedly finding ineffective assistance of counsel for not raising the sentencing issue on direct appeal, made no finding that the Petitioner was prejudiced by the deficient representation. In any event, we find that the granting of a delayed appeal from the original conviction is not authorized by statute, and accordingly, this appeal from the sentence imposed in the original convictions is dismissed.

Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Judge Ray L. Jenkins
Knox County Court of Criminal Appeals 06/25/01
Harry M. Pack vs. Tina Lewin Ponak

M2000-02285-COA-R3-CV
The Lincoln County Circuit Court granted the appellee's motion for summary judgment allowing the sale of real property held as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. We find, however, that whether there is an agreement not to partition the property is a disputed question of fact. We reverse the trial court and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Lee Russell
Lincoln County Court of Appeals 06/22/01
Shirley Breeding vs. Robert Edwards, et al

E2000-01900-COA-R3-CV
We are asked to decide whether the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 12 S.W.3d 785 (Tenn. 2000), is applicable to a case in which a plaintiff seeks to recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of its policy based upon the alleged negligence of an unknown motorist, the existence of whom is first asserted by a named defendant. In the instant case, a vehicle driven by the plaintiff Shirley Irene Breeding was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant Robert Lewis Edwards and owned by the defendant Johnston Coca Cola Bottling Group, Inc. ("Johnston"). She filed a complaint against these defendants within the period of the statute of limitations and secured the service of process upon her uninsured motorist ("UM") carrier, the appellee Farmers Insurance Exchange ("Farmers"). Outside the period of the statute of limitations, the defendants amended their answer to allege that an unknown motorist caused or contributed to the accident. Within 90 days, Breeding amended her complaint to add John Doe, i.e., the unknown driver, as a party defendant. Farmers moved to dismiss the claim against it. It relied on Brown, a slip and fall case. The trial court agreed with Farmers and dismissed Breeding's claim. Breeding appeals, asserting, inter alia, that Brown does not apply to the instant case. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm
Knox County Court of Appeals 06/22/01
Melissa Jane (Nichols) Steen vs. Evans Harrington Steen

M2000-00313-COA-R3-CV
In this custody case the General Sessions Court of Wilson County changed its custody order from joint care and control with primary custody in the father to exclusive custody in the father and standard visitation to the mother. The record shows, however, that the mother has had primary custody of the children since the divorce and that both parties are fit parents. They each love the children and take good care of them. Under those circumstances, we hold that there is a presumption in favor of continuity of placement. Therefore, we reverse the lower court's order and grant primary custody to the mother.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Ben H. Cantrell
Wilson County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Donald Andrews vs. Barbara Andrews

M2000-00163-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce case, each party sought modification of the child support order. The obligor father sought a decrease based on the older child's eighteenth birthday and graduation from high school. The obligee mother sought an increase based upon her belief that the father's income had increased. The trial court ordered a decrease based upon the older child's emancipation, but increased the amount due for the remaining minor child. The mother appeals, contending that the trial court failed to consider some of the father's work related benefits when setting the support. Because the mother had the burden of proving additional income to the father, and because she failed to meet that burden, we affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray
Sumner County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Supreme Court 06/21/01
Ronald Robinette vs. Mark Johnson

M2000-01514-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over a promissory note. The jury below found for the Plaintiff. We affirm the trial court and remand for a determination of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Plaintiff with respect to this appeal.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray
Sumner County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Brenda Hinton vs. Carey Stephens

W2000-02727-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute between relatives over a parcel of real property. Although the parties executed a contract which stated that the purchase price was due in one year, the parties disregarded the contract language for eleven years. The trial court ruled that the parties had acquiesced in the extension of the contract and that they were now estopped to deny the contract's validity. As a result, the trial court ordered that the home be sold as per the terms in the contract. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Martha B. Brasfield
McNairy County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Susan Wilson vs. Rushton Patterson

W2000-02771-COA-R3-CV
This is a medical malpractice case. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued defendant physician for injuries allegedly caused to wife by the physician's negligence. Physician moved for summary judgment supported by his affidavit that he conformed to the required standard of care. Plaintiffs, in opposition to the summary judgment, filed a deposition and affidavit of a physician practicing in Kentucky that expressed his knowledge of the standard of care in Memphis and similar communities. Physician moved to strike the affidavit primarily on the ground that plaintiffs' physician expert did not show a familiarity with the standard of care in Memphis, Tennessee. The court granted the motion to strike the affidavit and also granted summary judgment to defendant physician. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:James F. Russell
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Betty Vestal vs. Thomas Lawler

W2001-00013-COA-R3-CV
Buyer, under warranty deed, sued seller for breach of warranty against encumbrances after receiving notice of trustee's sale pursuant to deed of trust encumbering the property. Seller answered the complaint and filed a third party complaint against the lawyer he retained to perform a title search, which search failed to show the deed of trust. The third party defendant filed a counter complaint against the seller. The trial court granted the buyer judgment on the pleadings against seller, dismissed seller's third party complaint, and granted third party defendant summary judgment against seller. Seller appeals. We reverse in part and modify in part.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Clayburn L. Peeples
Gibson County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Berta Lee vs. Daniel Lee

W2000-01918-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case in which wife/mother was awarded custody of the parties' only minor son. Husband/father, acting pro se, appeals the trial court's decision with regard to the award of custody, the division of a retirement account, and attorney fees. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Judith Greer vs. Edwin Greer

W2000-02881-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises out of a divorce action filed by the parties in Benton County, Tennessee. Edwin Daniel Greer ("Husband") appeals the trial court's decision awarding the parties' marital residence to Judith Diane Greer ("Wife"), ordering Husband to pay rehabilitative alimony for four years, and awarding attorney's fees to Wife. We reverse the trial court's decision awarding the marital residence and the adjoining 9.4 acres to Wife and remand for further action by the trial court. We affirm the trial court's decision awarding Wife rehabilitative alimony and an attorney's fee of $3,000.00. We remand the case to the trial court for the amount and duration of rehabilitative alimony.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Childers
Originating Judge:Ron E. Harmon
Benton County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Christopher Farley vs. Carrolle Farley

W2000-01987-COA-R9-CV
This appeal involves a change of custody motion filed by Mother in the chancery court which had previously entered a divorce decree awarding joint custody of the minor child, with primary physical custody with Father. The chancery court dismissed the motion, holding that it had no jurisdiction to hear a change of custody motion by virtue of a previously filed petition in juvenile court to declare the child dependent and neglected, which petition was dismissed by the juvenile court. Mother was granted an interlocutory appeal. We vacate and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis
Crockett County Court of Appeals 06/21/01
Jack Coleman vs. City of Memphis

W2000-02865-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises out of a dispute over an annexation ordinance passed by the City of Memphis. The trial court granted summary judgment to Defendants due to its finding that Plaintiffs did not properly file a complaint contesting the annexation ordinance. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
K-Testing Lab, Inc., v. Estate of Larry Kennon, Brenda L. Kennon, Executrix

02A01-9703-CH-00064

At issue in this case is a stock redemption agreement executed by the owners of a closelyheld corporation. The Chancellor issued a mandatory injunction instructing the holder of the stock certificates to abide by the stock redemption agreement and turn over the shares to the corporation, and the holder appealed. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Originating Judge:Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Supreme Court 06/20/01
Bobbie Read, v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.

01A01-9803-CV-00121

This is a premises liability case in which the captioned plaintiff tripped over an obstruction in the aisle of a retail store. The Trial Court rendered summary judgment for the store because the obstruction was open and obvious. Plaintiff has appealed and presented the following issues:

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Originating Judge:Judge Cornelia A. Clark
Williamson County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Virgil L. Hitchcock and Shirley R. Hitchcock, v. Allen S. Boyd, Jr., M.D., James D. Acker, M.D., and Semmes-Murphy Clinic, Inc., et al.

02A01-9705-CV-00107

In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiff alleges that counsel for the defendants committed misconduct during the trial and appeals the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. We affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Originating Judge:Judge D'Army Bailey
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Vann Stiffler vs. Kroger Co.

W2000-02200-COA-R3-CV
This is a premise liability action arising from an incident wherein Mrs. Stiffler was struck in the back by shopping carts, knocked to the floor, and sustained injuries as a result of the fall. At trial, the jury awarded Mrs. Stiffler $75,000 and awarded $5,000 to Mr. Stiffler on his loss of consortium claim. Kroger filed a motion to set aside the verdict, for a new trial, or, alternatively, for remittitur. The trial court denied Kroger's motion, and this appeal ensued. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:George H. Brown
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Emanuel Lewis vs. Dr. Dwight Moore

W2000-02682-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a claim of medical malpractice. The plaintiff's minor child suffered brain damage during delivery. The only remaining defendants, Dr. Moore and Dr. Lawrence, moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Plaintiff appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to defendants.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Robert L. Childers
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Susan Weiss vs. State Farm

W2000-02506-COA-R3-CV
The Weisses procured supplemental insurance from State Farm through its agent, Mr. Brooks. In procuring such insurance, Mr. Weiss rejected uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Mrs. Weiss was involved in an automobile accident wherein she sustained damages exceeding the amount covered by her insurance policy. As the other driver involved in the accident was either uninsured or underinsured, the Weisses sought recovery from State Farm. State Farm denied the claim, determining that the Weisses did not have coverage under their umbrella policy. The Weisses brought an action against State Farm and Mr. Brooks. State Farm and Mr. Brooks filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:John R. Mccarroll, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Marie Puckett, et al v. Palma Diane Harrison and Tammy Harrison Kincer

02A01-9708-CH-00184

This appeal involves a divorced couple who decided to forego certain provisions in 2 their marital dissolution agreement concerning ownership of the marital residence without the consultation of counsel or the court. This matter began as a divorce action in the Chancery Court of Weakley County, Tennessee, and was styled: Palma Diane Harrison vs. Robert E. Harrison. Robert (“decedent”) and Palma Diane Harrison (“appellee”) entered into a Marital Dissolution Agreement on June 27, 1994. The divorce was granted on September 12, 1994, and the final decree of divorce incorporated the Marital Dissolution Agreement therein. In pertinent part, the Marital Dissolution Agreement provided:

Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Chancellor William Michael Maloan
Weakley County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
In the matter of Katherine C.

W2000-01714-COA-R3-CV
The trial court terminated the parental rights of Mother upon a finding that the grounds for termination were proven by clear and convincing evidence and that termination was in the minor child's best interests. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Christy R. Little
Madison County Court of Appeals 06/20/01
Wilma Lucchesi v. Alcohol And Licensing Commission Of

CH-00-1368-3

Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Appeals 06/20/01