Please enter some keywords to search.
| Kelly Stillwell vs. Thomas Stillwell
E2001-00245-COA-R3-CV
Thomas Stillwell ("Father") appeals the Trial Court's order which he claims improperly modified the original decree establishing child visitation. Father claims this was in error because there was no showing of a material change in circumstances. Father also appeals the Trial Court's order which prohibited him from possessing a firearm when he is exercising visitation with his son. We affirm the Trial Court's determination on visitation, as modified, and vacate the prohibition on Father's possessing a firearm in the presence of his child.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:John B. Hagler, Jr. |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Humphreys County Utility Dist. vs. Schatz Underground Cable, Inc.
M2000-02650-COA-R3-CV
In this negligence action, Plaintiff sued Defendant for damages in connection with the rupture of a gas line. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Allen W. Wallace |
Humphreys County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Catherine Jackson vs. Bruce Jackson
E2001-00287-COA-R3-CV
Catherine Dean Jackson ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint for divorce against her husband, Bruce Lane Jackson ("Defendant"). The parties entered a stipulation, which was approved by the Trial Court, in which they agreed both parties were entitled to a divorce and agreed that Plaintiff be granted custody of their minor child. The parties, however, did not agree on the remaining issues of alimony and the division of marital property and liabilities. Over approximately four years, the Trial Court referred these issues to a Special Master on three occasions. Upon each referral by the Trial Court, the Special Master held a hearing in which he heard arguments and, during the first two hearings, heard testimony from the parties and witnesses. After each hearing, the Special Master filed his report, but did not file a transcript of the hearing with the report as required by Tenn. R. Civ. P. 53.04(1). Among other findings, the Special Master recommended that Plaintiff receive "rehabilitative alimony for life . . . " in the amount of $1,000 per month and that Defendant pay the parties' entire 1994 tax liability. With the exception of modifying the Special Master's alimony recommendation to alimony in futuro, the Trial Court adopted the Special Master's recommendations which precipitated Defendant's appeal. Due to the Special Master's failure to comply with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 53.04(1), we vacate the portion of the the Trial Court's judgment relative to alimony and the 1994 tax liability, affirm the remainder of the judgment, and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Samuel H. Payne |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Kenneth Warren v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare, Nashville Memorial Hospital
M2000-02579-COA-R3-CV
This is a malicious prosecution case. The defendants obtained a warrant against the plaintiff after observing a man matching the plaintiff's description attempting to break into a car on the defendants' property. After a jury trial, the plaintiff was found not guilty. Subsequently, the plaintiff instituted a lawsuit against the defendants for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff now appeals. We affirm, finding that the defendants acted with probable cause and without malice in obtaining the warrant.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Barbara N. Haynes |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Jerome Felix Havely vs. Almeda Matthews Havely
E2000-02275-COA-R3-CV
In 1983, Jerome Felix Havely and Almeda Matthews Havely were divorced. They had entered into a Property Settlement Agreement which was incorporated into the Judgment of Divorce ("Divorce Judgment"). Neither the Divorce Judgment nor the Property Settlement Agreement mentioned the military pension of Jerome Felix Havely ("Plaintiff"). Approximately one month after the entry of the Divorce Judgment, Almeda Matthews Havely ("Defendant") filed a motion essentially seeking relief under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 60.02 in which she alleged that the Divorce Judgment should be set aside because she had not been aware of her entitlement to Plaintiff's military pension. This motion was dismissed in 1984 by the trial court for failure to prosecute. This matter lay dormant for fourteen plus years until Defendant filed two more Rule 60.02 motions. Defendant's third and final Rule 60.02 motion, filed in 1999, is the subject of this appeal. After three notices of hearing were filed, the trial court dismissed Defendant's motion without providing its reasons for the dismissal. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Joyce M. Ward |
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Susan Green v. Leon Moore, et al.
M2000-03035-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from the breach of a settlement agreement entered into by the Appellants and the Appellee. The Appellee filed a complaint against the Appellants in the Circuit Court for Williamson County, seeking damages for loss of reputation, embarrassment, humiliation, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, and loss of the ability to advance. The Appellants filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss.
Originating Judge:Robert E. Lee Davies |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/01 | |
| Mary Regina Blalock v. Travelers Insurance Company,
W2000-01616-WC-R3-CV
The appellant, Travelers, insists (1) the trial court improperly applied the last injurious injury rule, (2) the trial court erred by assuming certain facts and taking judicial notice of matters not in evidence, (3) the trial court erred by giving deference to the opinion of an evaluating physician instead of a treating physician and (4) the award of benefits based on 25 percent to both arms is excessive. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams, Judge |
Shelby County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/12/01 | |
| Dorothy Pirtle v. Royal Insurance Company
W2000-00867-WC-R3-CV
In this appeal, the employer's insurer insists (1) the award of benefits based on 75 percent permanent partial disability to both arms is excessive and (2) the trial court erred in awarding as discretionary costs an independent medical examiner's fee for examining and evaluating the injured employee. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the award of disability benefits should be affirmed and the award of discretionary costs modified.
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J
Originating Judge:W. Michael Maloan, Chancellor |
Obion County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/12/01 | |
| Pamela Wright (Quillen) vs. Dale M. Quillen
M2000-01852-COA-R9-CV
This appeal arises from the trial court granting a Rule 60 motion to suspend the judgment in a divorce action and allow a new trial. Husband and Wife were divorced in 1994. At that time, Wife was awarded the entirety of Company upon the condition she pay Husband $500,000 for the portion of Company awarded to him in the property division. Shortly after Wife paid Husband the money, Company sold an asset previously believed to be worthless for $1.7 million. Husband filed a Rule 60 motion in 1998 to set aside the trial court's 1994 property division on the basis that Wife had fraudulently valued the asset at $0 during the divorce hearing. The trial court granted the Rule 60 motion, setting a new trial to redetermine the value of Company at the time of the divorce. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Robert E. Corlew, III |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Michael Thomas v. State of Tennessee
W2000-01886-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendant, Michael Thomas, appeals as of right from the denial of post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, he asserts that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We find no merit to the Defendant's assertions; thus, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Dee Ann Gallaher vs. Curtis J. Elam
E2000-02719-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Carey E. Garrett |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Patricia Gore v. George Gore
M2000-02412-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a complaint for divorce filed by the Appellee in the Circuit Court of Williamson County. The trial court awarded the Appellee a divorce on the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct and adultery. The trial court divided the marital property and ordered the Appellant to pay the Appellee alimony in futuro and child support for the parties' two minor children. The trial court ordered the Appellant to maintain life insurance to secure the alimony and child support obligations. Additionally, the trial court entered a permanent injunction restraining the Appellant from taking the children in the presence of the Appellant's girlfriend.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Lindsay Taylor vs. Al Beard, et al
W2001-00347-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a grant of summary judgment, which dismissed loss of parental consortium claims brought by the children of a parent injured in an automobile accident. The children seek review of existing Tennessee precedent that fails to recognize loss of parental consortium causes of action resulting from the personal injury of a parent. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court and decline to create a new cause of action.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Robert L. Childers |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| State ex rel Elizabeth Durrant vs. Brittain Howard
E2000-02072-COA-R3-CV
In this custody dispute, the Trial Court gave custody to the father. The mother appealed. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Carey E. Garrett |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Roger Ritchie, et al vs. Tommy Pitner, et al
E2000-02689-COA-R3-CV
This lawsuit arises out of a Letter of Intent entered into between two of the various parties to this action. The trial court entered judgment on the issue of which party was entitled to possession of the property, but did not rule on any of the remaining claims. Because the judgment appealed from is not a final judgment for purposes of Rule 3 of the Tenn. R. App. P., we dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Dee Ann Gallaher vs. Curtis J. Elam
E2000-02719-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Carey E. Garrett |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Alexander Baxter v. Dept. of Correction
M2000-02447-COA-R3-CV
This case involves a petition for writ of certiorari based on a prison disciplinary proceeding. The inmate was found guilty of a disciplinary infraction by the prison disciplinary board. After his appeal to the prison warden was denied, the inmate filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, alleging numerous violations of his due process rights. The trial court dismissed the petition and Baxter now appeals. We affirm, finding that the sanctions imposed for the infraction did not rise to the level of interfering with the inmate's protected liberty interest and, therefore, did not trigger due process protections.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Loue Manning vs. K-Trans Mgt , Inc.
E2000-02462-COA-R3-CV
Loue G. Manning appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of K-Trans Management, Inc., as to his suit seeking damages for violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act and intentional infliction of emotional distress as a result of his termination by K-Trans. We find there is no material evidence to support his insistence that he was terminated because of his race and affirm the judgment below.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Warren Restoration Co. vs. Northgate Shopping Center vs. State Auto Ins. Cos.
M2000-02402-COA-R3-CV
This is a dispute regarding the valuation of a strip mall for purposes of determining the applicability of a co-insurance penalty clause in Northgate Shopping Center's casualty insurance policy. In a bench trial, the trial court found the witness for Northgate to be more credible than the witness for State Auto Insurance Companies, and found the replacement cost of the building to be $3,068,000. Since the building was insured for $3,100,000, the co-insurance penalty did not apply. The trial court awarded Northgate judgment of $73,637.56, less a $1,000 deductible. This judgment included prejudgment interest of $16,107.00 assessed against Northgate and awarded to Plaintiff Warren Restoration, which had repaired areas of the mall damaged by fire. On appeal, State Auto challenges the trial court's acceptance of the valuation as determined by witnesses for Northgate, contends that the co-insurance penalty clause is applicable, and challenges the award of prejudgment interest. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court in all respects.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| Lisa Hughes, et vir vs. Wilma Effler, et al
E2000-03147-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant appraiser's negligence in making an appraisal resulted in their damage. The Trial Court granted defendant summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal the refusal of the Trial Judge to grant them additional time to defend the summary judgment motion. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. William J. Clouse - Concurring
M2000-00436-CCA-R9-CD
I join with Judge Ogle in concluding that the Appellant's double jeopardy rights were not violated. I would also make the observation that, similar in purpose to the DUI statute, the stated public policy purpose in enacting the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Act was to remove from the highways those offenders who have "demonstrated their indifference to the safety and welfare of others." Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-602(2).
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge Norma McGee Ogle |
Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/01 | ||
| State of Tennessee v. David Scarbrough
E1998-00931-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, David Scarbrough, was convicted of two counts of felony murder, two counts of theft, and aggravated burglary. The trial court imposed sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole for each of the murders, a sentence of six years for the aggravated burglary and sentences of 11 months, 29 days for each of the thefts. All sentences are to be served consecutively. In this appeal of right, the defendant presents the following issues for review: (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions; (2) whether the defendant's statement to police was made knowingly and voluntarily; (3) whether the trial court erred by denying the defendant's challenge for cause of a juror; (4) whether the trial court erred by denying defendant's motion for continuance; (5) whether the trial court erred by refusing a jury instruction on facilitation of felony murder; (6) whether the trial court erred by admitting photographs of the crime scene; (7) whether the trial court erred by refusing to permit a private investigator to testify; (8) whether the trial court properly refused to allow the testimony of a psychologist during the guilt phase of trial; (9) whether the sentences were excessive; and (10) whether the trial court erred by denying the defendant's motion for a writ of error coram nobis based on newly discovered evidence. Because the trial court erred by failing to instruct on the lesser included offense of facilitation of felony murder and because such error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the felony murder convictions are reversed and the causes are remanded for a new trial. The remaining convictions are affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| James Ferguson vs. Debbie Warren
W2001-00217-COA-R3-CV
This case involves child visitation with a prison inmate. The child's father has been incarcerated since 1994 at the Northwest Correctional Facility in Lake County, Tennessee. The child resides with his mother in Weakley County, Tennessee. In 1997, the father filed a petition in the Lake County Chancery Court seeking an order requiring the child's mother to allow the father to communicate with his child. The mother failed to respond to the petition. In April 1999, the Lake County Chancery Court sua sponte dismissed the petition, finding that it should have been filed in Weakley County. This Court reversed, holding that lack of venue was a defensewhich was waived when the mother failed to respond. After the case was remanded, the mother sent a letter to the Lake County Chancery Court, advising that a paternity petition had been filed in the Weakley County Juvenile Court. Thereafter, the Lake County Chancery Court transferred the father's petition to the Weakley County Juvenile Court to be determined in conjunction with the paternity petition. The father now appeals the transfer of his petition. We affirm, finding that the trial court acted within its authority in transferring the case to a court with concurrent jurisdiction.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Lake County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| William Winchester vs. Glenda Winchester
W2000-01764-COA-R3-CV
In a post-divorce proceeding, father filed a "motion" to increase visitation with his minor child. The trial court found that there had been no material change of circumstances since the entry of the prior visitation order and denied the "motion." Father has appealed. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Don H. Allen |
Chester County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 | |
| John Floyd vs. Carolyn Floyd
M2000-02344-COA-R3-CV
When husband and wife divorced, they signed a marital dissolution agreement which was incorporated into the Final Decree of Divorce providing, inter alia, that husband would have visitation rights with wife's daughter by a previous marriage and husband would in turn pay college tuition and expenses for the child and would leave to the child by Will one-fourth of his estate. A dispute arose as to the extent of visitation, and husband filed a petition to establish visitation rights. Wife filed a petition to require husband to continue his obligations expressed in the marital dissolution agreement. The trial court felt that there was no meeting of the minds between the parties with regard to the visitation issue; therefore, there was no valid contract. Husband appeals. We reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Royce Taylor |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/01 |