Please enter some keywords to search.
| Lamm vs. State
03C01-9702-CC-00073
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/23/98 | |
| Special Judge Hamilton v. Gayden, Jr.
03S01-9702-CV-00024
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court inaccordance with Tenn. Code Ann. 5-6-225 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer, Lear Seating Corporation, contends that the trial court erred in awarding the employee, Janet L. Brooks, workers' compensation benefits based upon the court's finding that she suffered from "reflex sympathetic dystrophy or some psychiatric symptoms." The employer contends further that the trial court erred in determining the period of time in which the employee was eligible to for temporary total disability benefits. Finally, the employer challenges as excessive the trial court's award of permanent partial disability benefits based on a vocational disability rating of 85% to the body as a whole. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in all respects. At the time of the trial, the employee was forty-one (41) years old. She completed high school and attended one year of business college. Her work history includes jobs as a retail cashier and assembly line worker. The employee performed various functions for the employer from the time she began her employment there in November of 1985. When the employee was injured, she was operating a hand press which had overhead control buttons. On February 18, 1994, a 3-pound piece of steel fell off of the press bench and struck her left foot causing a crushing injury. She immediately saw the company nurse who referred her to the emergency room. At the emergency room, the employee was placed in a walking shoe and referred to an orthopedist. The employee was first treated by Dr. William Hovis, an orthopedic surgeon, on February 21, 1994. Dr. Hovis examined her and took x-rays of her left foot. He diagnosed her to have contusion of the left foot. On a return visit on March 14, 1994, in addition to the bruising and swelling, the employee also complained of knee pain which intensified when she sat for a long time. On examination, Dr. Hovis determined that the employee's knee was normal and that the contusion in her foot was resolving. Dr. Hovis opined that the employee would not have any permanent impairment or work restrictions as a result of her injury. Dr. Hovis saw the employee again on April 25, 1996 at the request of the employer for the 2
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Originating Judge:Hon. Ben K. Wexler, Circuit Judge |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/23/98 | |
| State vs. Christian
03C01-9609-CR-00336
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/23/98 | |
| State vs. Ronnie Michael Cauthern
02S01-9612-CC-00108
Originating Judge:Dick Jerman, Jr. |
Supreme Court | 03/23/98 | ||
| State vs. Darryl Webb
W1999-01585-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant appeals from a jury trial conviction for aggravated burglary, a Class C felony. In this appeal, the Defendant alleges the evidence was not sufficient to support his conviction. Concluding that the evidence was sufficient, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Dailey |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/98 | |
| State vs. Demetrius Robertson
02C01-9706-CR-00220
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/98 | |
| Hooker vs. Thompson
01A01-9709-CH-00533
Originating Judge:Henry F. Todd |
Court of Appeals | 03/20/98 | ||
| Wilson vs. Wilson
01A01-9704-CV-00152
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/98 | |
| Wilson vs. Mcwherter
01A01-9706-CV-00266
|
Court of Appeals | 03/20/98 | ||
| State vs. Joe Tyus
02C01-9701-CC-00039
Originating Judge:Dick Jerman, Jr. |
Haywood County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/98 | |
| State vs. Moss
01A01-9708-JV-00424
Originating Judge:Andrew J. Shookhoff |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/98 | |
| State vs. Robin Baker
02C01-9611-CR-00417
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/98 | |
| State vs. Ball
03C01-9701-CC-00023
Originating Judge:William R. Holt |
Cocke County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| State vs. Sammartino
02C01-9701-CC-00040
Originating Judge:Joe G. Riley. Jr. |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| State vs. Larry Morris
02C01-9610-CR-00379
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| Emma Clark vs. Randy Perry
02A01-9704-CH-00080
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis |
Crockett County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| State vs. Connie Fulton
02C01-9705-CR-00188
Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| State vs. Gilmore
02C01-9611-CR-00421
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/98 | |
| State vs. Daniel Naughton .
02C01-9612-CR-00449
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/18/98 | |
| State vs. Clarence Jackson
01C01-9702-CR-00041
Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr. |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/18/98 | |
| State vs. Mary Schwartz
01C01-9705-CC-00190
|
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/18/98 | |
| State vs. Joseph Brown
02C01-9611-CR-00387
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/18/98 | |
| Belinda Dunlap v. Nagle Industries
01S01-9707-CV-00153
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant contends the evidence preponderates against the trial court's award of permanent partial disability benefits based on twenty-five percent to the body as a whole. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be modified and affirmed. At the time of the trial, the employee or claimant, Belinda Dunlap, was forty-one years old and a high school graduate. She worked for the employer, Nagle Industries, on its production line from approximately July, 1991 until September 11, 1992, when she reported to the employer that she was experiencing pain in her right hand after operating a drill press. She was sent to see Dr. Dave Alexander on September 14, 1992. Dr. Alexander initially excused her from work for approximately two and one-half weeks. Three days later, the doctor released her to return to light duty, but she did not return until September 22. Upon her return, she continued to complain of wrist pain and asked to be referred to another doctor. She was allowed to leave work and referred to Dr. Cooper Beazley, who released her to return to left hand work only. There is a factual dispute as to her reason for not performing the work offered. She has since begun working for, apparently, another employer. At the trial, Dr. Beazley testified that he found no abnormality and no permanent impairment. Dr. Larry Laughlin, who examined her at the employer's request, found a normal range of motion and function in the claimant's right elbow, wrist, hand and fingers. Additionally, the claimant was treated by Dr. Winston Griner and evaluated by Dr. Lloyd Walwyn. Dr. Griner diagnosed right carpal tunnel syndrome from repetitive use of the right hand and assessed a permanent impairment rating of fifteen to twenty percent to the right upper extremity. Dr. Walwyn made a similar diagnosis and assessed twenty percent to the right upper extremity, from loss of grip strength in her dominant hand. Both assessments were based on appropriate guidelines. The trial court awarded, inter alia, permanent partial disability benefits based on twenty-five percent to the body as a whole. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(2). Under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law, injuries by accident arising out of and in the course of employment which cause either disablement or death of the employee are compensable. Reeser v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 938 S.W.2d 69 (Tenn. 1997). Compensation benefits are payable for the number of weeks established by a statutory schedule of the 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Robert E. Burch, |
Houston County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/18/98 | |
| David Richards v. Saturn Corporation
01S01-9706-CV-00131
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant states the issues as follows: 1. "Whether the trial court improperly granted Plaintiff's Motion to Permit Additional Proof after entering a final order of judgment; 2. "Assuming arguendo that the trial court properly granted Plaintiff's Motion to Permit Additional Proof, whether the proof introduced at both trials preponderates against the trial court's finding that Plaintiff was one hundred percent occupationally disabled; and 3. "Whether the "Amended Final Order" entered by the trial court inaccurately reflected the trial proceeding." Fairly stated, the issue is whether the evidence preponderates against an award of permanent partial disability based on one hundred percent to both arms and in favor of a lesser award. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should modified. This trial began on May 8, 1996 and was taken under advisement after both sides rested on May 8, 1996. On May 28, 1996, the plaintiff applied for leave to reopen its proof. The next day, the trial judge, apparently without having seen the motion to reopen, entered an order awarding the claimant permanent partial disability benefits based on twenty-percent to the body as a whole. The motion was argued two days later, on May 31, 1996, and was granted by an order entered on June 17,1996. Thereafter, additional proof was allowed and, on December 19, 1996, the trial court entered an amended final order allowing an additional eighty percent permanent partial disability to both arms. The appellant argues the trial judge abused his discretion by reopening the proof and that the amended judgment was void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Since the motion to reopen was timely made, the panel concludes the trial court had jurisdiction, in the exercise of its discretion, to reopen the proof. Moreover, we find no abuse of that discretion. The first issue is resolved in favor of the appellee. The employee or claimant, Richards, is thirty-eight years old, who has worked for General Motors since 1977. He began working for Saturn in 1993 and was, at that time, in excellent physical condition. From repetitive use of his hands on the production line, he gradually developed chronic overuse syndrome of both arms. As a result, he is unable to perform any job requiring the use of power tools or be placed in any of the present job openings at Saturn. He has thus been placed by Saturn on long term disability leave of absence. The employer concedes the injury is work related. Dr. Paul Parsons, who treated the claimant, opined by deposition on February 27, 1996 that the claimant was not permanently impaired. Dr. David Gaw, who examined the claimant, assessed a permanent medical impairment rating of ten percent to both arms and advised him to permanently 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Jim T. Hamilton, |
Maury County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/18/98 | |
| Kenneth Steele vs. State
01C01-9703-CC-00105
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Wayne County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/18/98 |