Please enter some keywords to search.
| Howell vs. Howell
M1999-00753-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce case, Talisa Gayle Kelly, formerly Howell, ("Wife") filed a petition seeking to increase child support and to enforce other provisions of the judgment of divorce. The trial court ordered Gary Morris Howell ("Husband") to pay Wife the balance due her for her interest in the former marital residence. It further found Husband in contempt for failing to maintain a life insurance policy for the benefit of the parties' minor child and ordered him to pay Wife an amount approximating what he would have paid in insurance premiums had he maintained the policy as required by the divorce judgment. Wife was also awarded half of her attorney's fees. We reverse the trial court's award of the unpaid premiums; in all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Lineberry vs. Locke
M1999-02169-COA-R3-CV
A citizen whose private photographs and video tapes were seized in the execution of a search warrant sued the sheriff and a deputy for invasion of privacy and outrageous conduct. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants at the close of the plaintiff's proof. Because we agree that the plaintiff did not prove either cause of action, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Wilson vs. Wilson
M1999-02045-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from the trial court's refusal to modify Mr. Wilson's child support obligation after he was terminated from his place of employment. We reverse the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Freethy vs. Maconi
M2000-00107-COA-R9-CV
This Rule 9 interlocutory appeal consists of the singular issue of whether Steven Maconi has sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee for it to exercise personal jurisdiction over him, thus requiring him to defend a paternity action brought in Tennessee. The Trial Court held that Mr. Maconi had sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee, and thus, it could exercise personal jurisdiction over him. We reverse the finding of the Trial Court and hold that Mr. Maconi does not have sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee for it to exercise personal jurisdiction over him.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:L. Raymond Grimes |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Donna Jean Sexton v. State of Tennessee
E1999-02226-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Carter County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| State vs. Selina Harrelson
W1999-00521-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Selina G. Harrelson, was convicted of possession of one-half gram or more of cocaine with intent to sell. She contends that the officer did not have probable cause to search the truck with the drug detection dog; that the evidence is insufficient to show that she possessed crack cocaine; and that the trial court should have imposed a sentence alternative to incarceration. We hold that the defendant lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in the truck to contest the search and that, in any event, the officer had probable cause. We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court properly sentenced the defendant to incarceration. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Carl Couch
W1999-00645-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his split sentence of 60 days confinement plus 1 year and 4 months of probation for the offense of reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon. The defendant contends in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying him total probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Thomas Rodgers, v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
M1999-02585-COA-R3-CV
In this Declaratory Judgment plaintiff sought statutory credits on his prison sentences. The Trial court granted the State summary judgment. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Herschel Pickens Franks, J.
Originating Judge:Hon. Carol L. Mccoy, Chancellor |
Davidson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/28/00 | |
| In re: Adoption of a male child, Derrick Douglas Duncan
M1999-01713-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a petition by prospective adoptive parents for termination of parental rights, temporary guardianship, and for adoption of the minor child of the defendant father. In a non-jury trial, at the conclusion of petitioner's proof, the trial court found that they had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant father had abandoned the child and dismissed the petition. The prospective adoptive parents have appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Smith County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Rodgers vs. TDOC
M1999-02585-COA-R3-CV
In this Declaratory Judgment plaintiff sought statutory credits on his prison sentences. The Trial court granted the State summary judgment. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. John Wayne Gray
M1999-01615-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, John Wayne Gray, appeals as of right from his conviction of the sale of a schedule II controlled substance. On appeal, he argues (1) that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion for acquittal or directed verdict because the State failed to establish circumstances and facts that would provide for a reasonable assurance of the identity of the evidence and because the State failed to establish an unbroken chain of custody; (2) that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury verdict; and (3) that the trial court erred in sentencing the Defendant to a mid-range sentence as a Range III offender. We find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Daniel Joe James
M1999-1423-CCA-R3-CD
On September 9, 1998, the Defendant, Daniel Joe James, was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The Defendant was convicted by a jury of simple possession of a controlled substance. He received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days probation and was fined $2,500.00. The Defendant now challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. On appeal, the State has conceded that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction. After a careful examination of the record, we agree that there is insufficient evidence against the Defendant to support a conviction. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Witt vs. Witt
M1999-02234-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal of the trial court's division of marital property in a divorce proceeding. Finding no error in the trial court's judgment, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| TN Farmers vs. Roger Hostetler, et al
W1999-00368-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action filed in the Lauderdale County Circuit Court by Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company. The complaint sought a declaration that Tennessee Farmers was not obligated to defend or indemnify its insureds against a wrongful death lawsuit filed by James Drake, executor of the estate of Mattie Lee Drake. After both sides filed motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that coverage did not exist under the Personal Liability Insurance Policy and entered summary judgment in favor of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Glenda Tate vs. Baptist Memorial
W1999-00553-COA-R3-CV
Hospital employee was accused of negotiating payroll checks of other employees and was discharged. Employee filed defamation suit, and trial court granted summary judgment because the pleadings and affidavits established that there was no publication of the alleged defamatory words since all communication thereof was to hospital employees.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| George Todd vs. State
M1999-00976-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendant appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court found that the petition was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Barbara Madison, etc. vs Marie Love, et al
E2000-01692-COA-RM-CV
Upon remand from the Supreme Court and upon further consideration, we reverse ourselves and conclude that the trial court erred in granting the defendants summary judgment on the plaintiff's claim of negligent failure to render aid to another in peril. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:G. Richard Johnson |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Glenda Tate vs. Baptist Memorial
W1999-00553-COA-R3-CV
Hospital employee was accused of negotiating payroll checks of other employees and was discharged. Employee filed defamation suit, and trial court granted summary judgment because the pleadings and affidavits established that there was no publication of the alleged defamatory words since all communication thereof was to hospital employees.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Bobby Perkins
W1999-01368-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Bobby Earl Perkins, appeals his conviction for especially aggravated robbery, contending that the trial court erred (1) by allowing a witness to testify about the defendant's statement a year before the robbery that he planned to rob the victim, (2) by allowing a police officer to testify to statements the victim made regarding the defendant, and (3) by sentencing the defendant to twenty-one years. We affirm the conviction, but we modify the sentence to twenty years.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Haywood County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Abbott vs. Gateway
M1999-00653-COA-R3-CV
The General Sessions Court of Davidson County awarded a judgment against the defendant below, Nationwide Insurance Company, in a case involving a car accident. Nationwide filed an appeal to the Davidson County Circuit court but failed to secure a trial date within 45 days as required by Davidson County Local Rule of Practice 20(b) (1999). The circuit court dismissed the case due to Nationwide's failure, and Nationwide filed a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 60.02 motion to set aside the circuit court dismissal due to its attorney's excusable neglect. When the circuit court denied Rule 60.02 relief Nationwide appealed to this court. On appeal, we reverse the decision of the circuit court finding that it should have granted Nationwide's request for Rule 60.02 relief and set aside the dismissal of Nationwide's circuit court appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Clark vs. Crow
M1999-00916-COA-R9-CV
We grant this interlocutory appeal to consider a question of first impression regarding whether there is a right to jury trial prior to the issuance of an order of protection pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-3-605, (hereinafter "order of protection"). Specifically, we are asked to determine whether a party against whom an order of protection is sought is entitled to a jury trial as a matter of right before this order is issued. After reviewing Tennessee's constitutional and statutory guarantees to a jury trial, we have determined that there is no right to a jury trial prior to the issuance of an order of protection. The circuit court's decision is affirmed and remanded for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| George Todd vs. State
M1999-00976-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendant appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court found that the petition was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Mona Koja vs. Abed Koja
W1999-00993-COA-R3-CV
Wife was granted a divorce and received a division of marital property and alimony in futuro. The trial court denied Wife attorney fees and expenses. Wife has appeal. The trial court's order denying an award of attorney fees and expenses is reversed. The case is remanded for entry of an order awarding one-half of the attorney fees and expenses.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kevin Padgett
M2000-00038-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr. |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Rodney Buford vs. State
M1999-00487-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Rodney Buford, is serving an effective sentence of life plus twenty years. His petition for habeas corpus relief was properly dismissed by the trial court because the judgment is not facially invalid and the sentence has not been served.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 |