Nathan E.Brooks v. Board of Professional Responsibility - Concurring In Part and Not Joining In Part

Case Number
E2018-00125-SC-R3-BP

Nathan E. Brooks petitioned to have his law license reinstated. Rather than pay an advance cost deposit under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 30.4(d)(9), Mr. Brooks filed a pauper’s oath and indigency affidavit. A Board of Professional Responsibility hearing panel dismissed the petition without prejudice, giving Mr. Brooks the opportunity to refile the petition with a cost deposit. The trial court agreed with the hearing panel and, now, so does the Tennessee Supreme Court. 

Authoring Judge
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge
Chancellor Jeffrey F. Stewart
Case Name
Nathan E.Brooks v. Board of Professional Responsibility - Concurring In Part and Not Joining In Part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version