Please enter some keywords to search.
| 03A01-9512-CV-00448
03A01-9512-CV-00448
Originating Judge:Inman |
Court of Appeals | 05/30/96 | ||
| 03C01-9503-CR-00075
03C01-9503-CR-00075
|
Greene County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/30/96 | |
| 03C01-9507-CR-00206
03C01-9507-CR-00206
Originating Judge:Mary Beth Leibowitz |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/29/96 | |
| 02S01-9502-CV-00020
02S01-9502-CV-00020
|
Supreme Court | 05/28/96 | ||
| 03C01-9307-CR-00223
03C01-9307-CR-00223
|
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| 02S01-9501-CR-00007
02S01-9501-CR-00007
|
Supreme Court | 05/28/96 | ||
| 03C01-9507-CR-00205
03C01-9507-CR-00205
Originating Judge:William M. Barker |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| 02A01-9411-CH-00261
02A01-9411-CH-00261
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| 03C01-9509-CC-00282
03C01-9509-CC-00282
Originating Judge:Ben K. Wexler |
Greene County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| Christopher v. Sockwell
01S01-9408-CV-00090
|
Supreme Court | 05/28/96 | ||
| 02A01-9411-CH-00262
02A01-9411-CH-00262
Originating Judge:C. Neal Small |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| 02S01-9505-CR-00037
02S01-9505-CR-00037
|
Supreme Court | 05/28/96 | ||
| 03A01-9507-JV-00211
03A01-9507-JV-00211
Originating Judge:C. Van Deacon |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| 02A01-9511-CH-00258
02A01-9511-CH-00258
Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/96 | |
| Martin H. Aussenberg, v. Bruce S. Kramer, David J. Cocke, and Borod and Kramer
02A01-9411-CH-00262
In this case, Plaintiff, Martin H. Aussenberg (“Aussenberg”), appeals the trial court’s valuation of his former partnership’s work-in-progress and accounts receivable as well as its finding regarding Aussenberg’s interest in the partnership’s accounts receivable and work-inprogress. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Originating Judge:Chancellor C. Neal Small |
Court of Appeals | 05/26/96 | ||
| 01C01-9505-CC-00159
01C01-9505-CC-00159
|
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 02C01-9505-CC-00125
02C01-9505-CC-00125
Originating Judge:F. Lloyd Tatum |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 01C01-9409-CC-00319
01C01-9409-CC-00319
Originating Judge:James K. Clayton, Jr. |
Rutherford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 01A01-9510-CH-00489
01A01-9510-CH-00489
Originating Judge:H. Denmark Bell |
Court of Appeals | 05/24/96 | ||
| 02C01-9408-CR-00153
02C01-9408-CR-00153
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 02C01-9503-CC-00064
02C01-9503-CC-00064
Originating Judge:John Franklin Murchison |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 01A01-9512-CH-00543
01A01-9512-CH-00543
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Macon County | Court of Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| 02C01-9507-CR-00202
02C01-9507-CR-00202
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 | |
| Robert F. Seymore v. Snap-On Tools Corporation
03S01-9507-CH-00081
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant, Snap-On Tools Corporation, has appealed from the action of the trial court in awarding plaintiff, Robert F. Seymore, 4% permanent partial disability to each upper extremity. Plaintiff is 52 years of age and has a 12th grade education. He suffered bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome injuries as a result of work-related activities. Surgery was performed on the right on July 13, 1993 and the left on August 31, 1993. He returned to work during October, 1993. Plaintiff's job title is a heat treat operator, and he constantly uses his hands and wrists in his work. He testified that, after surgery, he felt some relief but most of his symptoms of pain and numbness have returned. He has continued to work without a drop in his production rate but says he still suffers from his injuries as he works and even after work. There is evidence from his wife and supervisor to substantiate his complaints of continuing problems. The only issue on appeal is the extent of permanent disability. Dr. Paul E. Gorman, an orthopedic surgeon, testified by deposition and did not give plaintiff any permanent impairment under the A.M.A. Guidelines. However, he testified plaintiff should be restricted in working. His restrictions included no overtime work, avoidance of vibration tools and no lifting or handling of items weighing in excess of 1 pounds. Dr. Eric C. Roberts, a physician in physical medicine and rehabilitation, also testified by deposition and examined plaintiff for the purpose of giving an impairment rating. He agreed with the restrictions as imposed by Dr. Gorman but was of the opinion plaintiff had permanent impairment under A.M.A. Guidelines of ten percent to each upper extremity. -2-
Authoring Judge: Roger E. Thayer, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. G. Richard Johnson, |
Washington County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/24/96 | |
| 01C01-9403-CR-00084
01C01-9403-CR-00084
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/96 |