Please enter some keywords to search.
| Stephanie Clinard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
01S01-9703-CV-00051
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant here contends the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that the employee's injury was causally connected to her employment. The panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The employee or claimant, Clinard, is approximately 4 years old and has a GED. She has worked as a cashier at a convenience market in Springfield since 1992, having previously worked as a cashier, as a baby sitter, as a production worker in a garment factory and as a homemaker. On March 24, she noticed a pop in her neck and a shooting pain in her left arm, while manually operating a credit card machine at work. She reported the event to her supervisor, who did not refer her to a physician or provide a list from which she could choose one. The claimant went to her own physician, Dr. Robert Ferland, who took her off work and prescribed physical therapy. She also saw two neurosurgeons, both of whom ordered diagnostic testing. One of them expressed doubt as to whether the injury was work-related, but was unable to point to any other possible cause. The other had no opinion as to the cause of injury. The claimant was unable to work from May 2, 1994 until she returned during the last week in July of the same year. She terminated her employment in November of that year after the pain worsened. The employer did not provide any medical benefits. Ultimately, the claimant sought outa Dr. Cantrell, who referred her to Dr. Arthur Cushman, another neurosurgeon. Dr. Cushman diagnosed a herniated disc in her neck and performed corrective surgery. The pain diminished following the surgery. Dr. David Gaw saw her after surgery and prescribed permanent limitations. The claimant took karate after the injury, but we find in the record no evidence that her injury was caused by karate lessons, as the employer's insurer contends. The lay proof supports the claimant's contention that her injury was work related. Dr. Cushman conceded the credit card machine incident and continued use of the arm at work was a possible cause of the injury. He estimated her permanent impairment at seven percent.. Dr. Gaw testified the credit card incident was the most likely cause, in the absence of any other explanation, and assigned a fifteen percent permanent impairment to the whole body. Both of these doctors based their opinions of permanent impairment on approved guidelines. The trial court found the injury to be work related and awarded benefits under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law (the Act). Appellate 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. James E. Walton, |
Robertson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/02/98 | |
| Page G. Stuart v. State of Tennessee, Dept. of Safety
01-S-01-9612-CH-00239
During a wide-ranging investigation, law enforcement officers located and seized several items of property thought to be used in the conduct of an illegal drug enterprise. Criminal charges followed the several seizures, and Page Stuart, the appellant, pleaded guilty to offenses involving delivery and conspiracy to deliver large quantities of marijuana. The State thereafter instituted administrative proceedings under Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-201 et seq. (1991 & Supp. 1992) for the forfeiture of the property seized. Although Stuart challenged the forfeiture of some of the property,1 he was not successful, and both the Chancery Court and the Court of Appeals upheld the forfeiture. We granted Stuart’s application for review under Rule 11
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Chancellor Irvin H. Gilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 03/02/98 | |
| Martha Shupe v. Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania
03S01-9706-CV-00065
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appeal was perfected by the employer, Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, from a decision of the trial court awarding the employee, Martha Jane Shupe, 9% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. On appeal defendant insurance company insists (1) the trial court was in error in finding the cervical disc injury was work-related and (2) if the injury was work- related, the award of 9% was excessive under the proof. The employee contends (1) she is totally disabled and the award should be fixed at 1% and (2) the trial court was in error in finding the aneurysm rupture was not work-related. Plaintiff was 45 years of age at the time of the trial and had completed the 8th grade. She was employed at a Burger King restaurant on April 27, 1992, when she climbed upon a shelf to return a box to a higher shelf; in attempting to come down, her foot slipped and she fell some distance landing on her feet; she stated the fall caused her body to twist and she experienced immediate intense pain in her neck. Plaintiff was taken immediately to a hospital emergency room where she was examined and referred to another doctor. She remained off work for about two weeks and then returned to work on a reduced time schedule. She testified after some period of part time work, her employer decided she should not work further. On about May 27, 1992, she was present with her husband at a court hearing (unrelated to present case) when she turned her head to look out the window and felt a sting of pain in the back of her neck. Shortly later she experienced double vision problems and could not move her legs for awhile. She also became nauseated. Further investigation into her complaints indicated there had been a rupture of an aneurysm in her head and that she also had a herniated cervical disc. Surgery was performed to correct the aneurysm problem and about a year later, she had a fusion to repair the disc problem. The trial was conducted on October 28 and 29, 1996, which was about 4 _ years after sustaining the injury. She testified she had attempted to find some light 2
Authoring Judge: Roger E. Thayer, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Ben K. Wexler, |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/02/98 | |
| Teresa Woody v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
02S01-9976-CH-00052
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court awarded the plaintiff benefits based on a finding of 25 percent permanent partial disability to her whole body. The defendant appeals, asserting the excessiveness of this award and the bar of the statute of limitations. An in-depth discussion of her employment history with the defendant is necessary for an adequate assessment of her claim. She was 34 years old at the time of trial and lives in Obion County, Tennessee. She completed high school and attended Vanderbilt University for a short period of time. At the time of trial, she was a senior at the University of Tennessee at Martin majoring in English, lacking approximately three hours before graduation. Following graduation, she plans to attend graduate school, seek a Masters Degree in English, and ultimately teach. Her work history includes a work study program at Vanderbilt University, primarily clerical in nature. She has worked for Baptist Hospital in Union City as an admission clerk, a clerical position, and in 1988, she began working for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, in the gift shop. Shortly thereafter, she moved into the factory, working on a bias unit, which involved repetitive overhead lifting, twisting and turning. In June of 1989, she began having pain and problems with her shoulders, and informed her supervisor, David Stephenson, of these problems and filled out an incident report in July, 1989. She was initially seen by Dr. David St. Clair who diagnosed impingement syndrome. Her claim for workers' compensation benefits was eventually denied. She continued to work on the bias machine and her shoulder problems progressively worsened. In 199, she resigned her position with the defendant to attend school, and worked part-time for Baptist Hospital in Union City, again 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Chancellor |
Obion County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/02/98 | |
| Harold P. Cousins, D/B/A Cousins Construction, v. MK Ferguson of Oak Ridge Company
03A01-9709-CV-00435
This is an action to recover profits the plaintiff contractor alleges he would have made had he been allowed to construct an additional four warehouses similar in design and usage to a fifth warehouse he constructed and for which he was paid.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge WIlliam H. Inman
Originating Judge:Judge James B. Scott, Jr. |
Court of Appeals | 03/02/98 | ||
| ) Hon. Frank v. Williams, Iii,
O3A01-9708-CH-00321
|
Roane County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Brady vs. Valentine
01A01-9707-CV-00308
Originating Judge:Cornelia A. Clark |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Slate vs. State
03A01-9708-CV-00369
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| State vs. Trampas Sweeney
01C01-9702-CC-00053
Originating Judge:William M. Barker |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Kizer vs. Kizer
01A01-9707-GS-00304
Originating Judge:Barry R. Brown |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Bellamy vs. State
03A01-9701-BC-00035
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| Brown vs. Davidson
01A01-9702-CV-00049
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| Allstate vs. Auto
03A01-9706-CH-00225
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| 03A01-9709-CV-00444
03A01-9709-CV-00444
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Reid vs. Sundquist
01A01-9709-CH-00494
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Copas vs. Copas
03A01-9708-CV-00375
|
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Witt vs. Tennessee
03A01-9709-CH-00400
|
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| State vs. Garrison
03C01-9702-CC-00047
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Bledsoe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Lampley vs. Lampley
01A01-9708-CH-00423
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| Hooker vs. Thompson
01A01-9709-CH-00533
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Molin, M.D., et . ux. vs. Perryman Construction Co.
01A01-9705-CV-00232
Originating Judge:Barbara N. Haynes |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Webb vs. Mortgage Systems Corp.
01A01-9512-CH-00566
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Walker vs. Exchange
03A01-9709-CV-00402
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 | ||
| State vs. Manning
03C01-9501-CR-00012
Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb |
Bradley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/27/98 | |
| Lampley vs. Lampley
01A01-9708-CH-00423
|
Court of Appeals | 02/27/98 |