APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
03C01-9902-CC-00073

03C01-9902-CC-00073

Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
Ashok v. Mehta, M.D.

03A01-9908-CH-00289
Court of Appeals 12/16/99
03C01-9903-CR-00094

03C01-9903-CR-00094

Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen
Morgan County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
03C01-9904-CR-00136

03C01-9904-CR-00136

Originating Judge:W. Lee Asbury
Claiborne County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
State vs. Vinton Maclin

W1999-01845-CCA-R3-CD

Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
State vs. Roy Morris

W1999-01628-CCA-R3-CO

Originating Judge:R. Lee Moore Jr.
Lake County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
State vs. Carlos Curry

W1999-01760-CCA-R3-CD

Originating Judge:Carolyn Wade Blackett
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Cheatham County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/16/99
M1998-00437-CCA-R3-CD

M1998-00437-CCA-R3-CD
Montgomery County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
Brenda Sneed vs. Thomas Stovall

W1998-00607-COA-R9-CV

Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams
Shelby County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
James Ferguson vs. Debbie Warren

W1999-02058-COA-R3-CV

Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford
Lake County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
Lezley Johnson vs. Kenneth Downing

W1998-00549-COA-R3-CV

Originating Judge:John R. Mccarroll, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
Janice Moore v. Yale Security, Inc.,

E2000-01757-WC-R3-CV
The trial court found that this action was barred by the statute of limitations.
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Frank V. Williams, Chancellor
Moore County Workers Compensation Panel 12/15/99
Frank Morimanno vs. Tommy Middleton

W1998-00563-COA-R3-CV

Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris
Henderson County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
Robert Payne vs. Leslie Shumake

W1999-02059-COA-R3-CV

Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
Hardeman County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
Katherine Jarred vs. Kistie Hendrix

W1998-00550-COA-R3-CV

Originating Judge:James E. Swearengen
Shelby County Court of Appeals 12/15/99
M1998-00460-CCA-R3-CD

M1998-00460-CCA-R3-CD
Montgomery County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
State vs. William Davis, Jr.

M1999-01738-CCA-R3-CD
Montgomery County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
Charles Timothy Duncan v. Royal Insurance Co.

W1998-00093-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: L. Terry Lafferty, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Dewey
McNairy County Workers Compensation Panel 12/15/99
State vs. Paul Max Quandt, Jr.

M1998-00446-CCA-R3-CD

Originating Judge:James Curwood Witt
Franklin County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
State vs. Bobby J. Young

M1998-00402-CCA-R3-CD
Dickson County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
M1999-00178-CCA-R3-CD

M1999-00178-CCA-R3-CD
Marshall County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
State vs. Glen H. Earls

M1998-00447-CCA-R3-CD
Coffee County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99
State vs. Frankie E. Casteel

E1999-00076-CCA-R3-CD
Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of the first-degree murders of Richard Mason, Kenneth Griffith and Earl Smock in the Hamilton County Criminal Court, Douglas A. Myer, J., and the defendant appealed. The Court holds (1) that the trial court's failure to follow statutory procedures before admitting evidence that the defendant had committed prior bad acts was harmless error; (2) evidence that the defendant had threatened trespassers was properly admitted; (3) the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant; (4) failure to swear-in the jury prior to voir dire was at most harmless error where the jury was impaneled in another county and sworn in there; (5) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to present alternative perpetrator evidence when that evidence was too far removed in time and place to connect it to the murders; (6) the trial court's failure to suppress evidence found on the defendant's property was proper because the evidence was seized during a search for the victims; (7) testimony about the contents of incriminating letters and newspaper articles was necessary to explain the defendant's attempt to destroy them; (8) the trial court properly allowed the state to cross examine the defendant about items seized from his home; but (9) the admission of five hours of an extremely prejudicial conversation between the defendant, his wife and his mistress in order to allow the jury to hear one adoptive admission was reversible error, especially when (10) the state relied on the unfairly prejudicial portion of the conversation when arguing its case to the jury in order to highlight the defendant's character. Reversed and remanded.

Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/15/99