APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

This appeal arises from a dispute regarding whether Plaintiff B& H was entitled to a deficiency judgment following a foreclosure sale of Defendants' property. Despite Defendant Brooks' counter-claim of fraud in the sale, the court found that Plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment. Defendant Brooks' motion for new trial or for an amendment of the findings of fact was denied. Brooks appeals this denial.

Mary Ann Quinn(“Wife” or “Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court whichordered Gregory M. Quinn (“Husband” or “Appellee”) to pay for the parties’ minor child’s private school tuition in monthly increments designated as alimony; ordered Husband to pay a portion of Wife’s attorney fees; and classified the following property of the parties: 1. Amer. Express IDS Flexible Annuity Account ($58,775) Husband 2. Charles Schwab Account ($54,190) Husband 3. Residence at 2368 Circle ($100,000) 40% Husband/60% Marital

Frederic R. Harris, Inc., (FRH), formerly PRC Engineering, Inc., entered into a contract with the Metroolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro), whereby FRH agreed to provide computer design services to Metro on a cost-plus-fee basis.  FRH promised to provide engineering services for the design an implementation of a Computerized Traffic signal system for Metro.