Terry E. McLeese, Jr., v. Tammy Lynn McLeese - Concurring
Custody of the five-year-old son of these parties was awarded to the appellee-mother in a post-divorce hearing. The parties initially agreed upon joint custody. The father appeals, complaining essentially that the Chancellor relied too heavily on the tender years doctrine. We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the Chancellor, but are bound by the limitations imposed by TENN. R. APP. P., RULE 13(d). Unless the evidence preponderates against the judgment, we must affirm. |
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Brown
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Day
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9605-CR-00197
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Strickland
|
Cocke | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Corso vs. Jones
|
Morgan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Housewright
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brown
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bailey vs. State
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Smith v. Zurich
|
Smith | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State vs. Carl Saine
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Henley vs. State
|
Supreme Court | ||
Henley vs. State
|
Supreme Court | ||
Carter vs. State
|
Greene | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Hall
|
Hamilton | Supreme Court | |
State vs. James Dantes
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Bingham, Jessie Baker, and Donald Patterson
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Hall
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Dixon
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Dixon
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Scotty Wright
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9610-CC-00429
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CR-00528
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Maynord vs. Norris
|
Overton | Court of Appeals |