Friar vs. Kroger
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Johnny Clark
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs.Collins
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Friedman
|
Carter | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Carol Douglas v. Graves Gold Leaf Gallery of West Tennessee, Inc., et al
|
Madison | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State vs. Perry A. Cribbs
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Perry A. Cribbs
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Scotty White
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Perry A. Cribbs
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Perry A. Cribbs
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
01S01-9702-CH-00026
|
Wilson | Supreme Court | |
Cole vs. Campbell, Comm., et. al.
|
Supreme Court | ||
Terrance B. Smith v. State of Tennessee
|
Tipton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Steven Cobb v. Joseph Vinson, et al.
Stephen Cobb (“petitioner”) filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Circuit Court of Lake County against Joseph Vinson, Chairman of the Lake County Regional Correctional Facility disciplinary board (“LCRCF”); Billy Compton, warden of LCRCF; and Donal Campbell (“commissioner”), commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction (collectively “respondents”) seeking court review of actions taken by the prison disciplinary board, prison warden, and department commissioner. Due process violations resulting therefrom were also alleged. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for dismissal for improper venue and petitioner has appealed. On appeal, a single issue was presented for our review: whether the trial court erred in granting respondents’ motion to dismiss for improper venue. For reasons state hereinafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand. |
Lake | Court of Appeals | |
Rovene Lowe, v. Winnie Sue Sanders Cannon and husband, Robert Cannon
This is a suit to establish a resulting trust and to recover for the breach thereof. Plaintiff/Appellee Rovene Lowe (Lowe) brought suit alleging a resulting trust and seeking damages arising from an alleged breach by Defendants/Appellants Winnie Sue Sanders Cannon (Mrs. Cannon) and Robert Cannon (Mr. Cannon). Charles Sanders died in 1990. The trial court found that Lowe had proven the existence of a resulting trust and that the Cannons had breached the trust. Consequently, the trial court awarded Lowe $15,840 in damages. The Cannons appeal. |
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
The Oak Ridge Boys, Inc., v. Steve H. Sanders, et. al.
This is an unemployment compensation case. Plaintiff, The Oak Ridge Boys, Inc., appeals the order of the trial court which affirmed the decision of the Board of Review of the Tennessee Department of Employment Security to award benefits to Steve Sanders. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Carver Plumbing Company v. Martha Cone Beck
Plaintiff Carver Plumbing Company, Inc. (Carver Plumbing), appeals the trial court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of Carver Plumbing’s former attorney, Defendant/Appellee Martha Cone Beck (Beck). We reverse the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Carver Plumbing’s action against Beck is barred by the one-year statute of limitations applicable to legal malpractice actions. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Est. of John B. Ferguson, Jr., Deceased, and John and Patricia Sylawa, v. First American Trust Company, N.A., Executor
This is a will contest case involving a succession of wills, disputes as to the testamentary capacity of the testator at the time of the making of each of the wills, and the standing of the contestants. At the present stage of the proceedings, the contestants are in the position of plaintiffs, because they initiated the contest. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Gail Joan Hollen Ritchie v. David Anthony Ritchie
This is an appeal from a divorce decree in which the only issue is which parent should have principal custody of Luke, the minor child of the parties who was born July 13, 1993. The divorce decree of the Trial Court granted principal custody to the father, and the mother appealed to this Court. Her sole issue on appeal is: The Trial Court erred in denying Plaintiff/Appellant primary custody of the minor child of this marriage. |
Houston | Court of Appeals | |
Kerry Garland v. Jim Bonner and d/b/a EZA Aqua Glass Pools; Ken Hopkins and Pam Hopkins v. Jim Bonner and d/b/a EZA Aqua Glass Pools - Concurring
This is an appeal of two cases consolidated for trial. Both cases originated in the General Sessions Court of Maury County, Tennessee and are styled as follows: Ken Hopkins and wife Pam Hopkins, |
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Bonnie Stillwell
The appellant, Bonnie Stillwell, appeals as of right the Blount County Circuit Court’s order to revoke her probation. She contends that the trial court’s order was improper in light of her efforts to comply with the terms of probation. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jacqueline S. (Weibel) Brewer v. Joseph William Weibel, III - Concurring
This is a post-divorce child custody suit. Joseph Weibel III (“father”) filed a petition in the Chancery Court of Shelby County against Jacqueline Brewer (“mother”) seeking to have custody of the parties’ minor child, Joseph Weibel IV, (“Joey”) changed from mother to father. Mother had primary physical custody of the parties’ child pursuant to a consent order calling for joint custody. Following a hearing, the chancellor awarded father sole custody, with mother having extensive visitation. The court also ordered father to pay mother’s attorney fees and expenses in connection with the litigation. Mother has raised two issues by this appeal. First, whether the evidence preponderates against the finding of the chancellor that it was in the best interest of the parties’ child to award custody to father. And second, although father was directed to pay mother’s attorney fees and litigation expenses in connection with the trial below, mother as appellant herein raises the issue of whether the chancellor abused his discretion in directing father to pay mother’s attorney fees. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we affirm the award of custody to father and reverse the award of attorney fees to mother. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Tipton County Department of Public Instruction, et al., v. Delashmit Electric Company, et al.
This is a breach of contract case involving the enforcement of an arbitration clause. We find the arbitration clause applicable, reverse the judgment of the lower court, and remand the case for |
Tipton | Court of Appeals | |
Jacqueline S. Whiteside, v. Jerry Whiteside
This appeal is from the action by the trial court on a contempt citation by the Appellant, hereinafter “Wife,” and a Petition to Modify the original Divorce Decree and a motion under Rule 60, Tenn. R. Civ. P., brought by the Appellee, hereinafter “Husband.” |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. James Ray Bartlett
The defendant, James Ray Bartlett, was indicted for DUI, driving on a revoked license, five counts of reckless driving, resisting arrest, evading arrest and reckless endangerment. At the close of the state's proof, the trial court granted the defendant's motion for acquittal as to the charge of resisting arrest. The jury rendered guilty verdicts as to the remaining counts. After setting aside the conviction for reckless endangerment, the trial court sentenced the defendant to ten months for the DUI; four months and fifteen days for driving on a revoked license; five months for the reckless driving convictions, all of which were merged as one offense; and ten months for evading arrest. The transcript of the trial indicates sentences were ordered to be served consecutively for an effective sentence of twenty-nine months fifteen days with the minimum service at seventy-five percent. The judgment form indicates concurrent sentencing for all new convictions. The trial court revoked the defendant's community corrections sentence for prior convictions; these new sentences were ordered to be served consecutively to the prior offenses according to the judgment form. |
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals |