Estate of Effie S. Hooker, Deceased and Harold E. Matheny, Administrator, C.T.A. of the Estate of Effie S. Hooker, Deceased, v. Suntrust Bank of Nashville, Bank of Nashville, N.A. et al.
This case concerns a claim filed by SunTrust Bank, Nashville, N.A.(hereinafter SunTrust) against the estate of Effie S. Hooker, the second wife of famed Middle Tennessee lawyer John J. Hooker, Sr. Mr. Hooker died on Christmas Eve of 1970, leaving the majority of his estate to his widow. According to the prevailing probate practice of the day, a portion of Mr. Hooker’s estate was placed |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Bellevue Properties, LLC., v. United Retail Incorporate, et al.
This case concerns the burden placed on a commercial landlord in mitigating damages caused by a commercial tenant’s abandonment of the leased property. Although our courts heretofore have required a landlord who suffers breach to use reasonable commercial methods to reduce his damages, this tenant-in-breach would read two additional duties into those reasonable commercial methods. First, the tenant would require that the abandoned property be marketed specially and apart from the landlord’s other commercial space inventory. Second, the landlord would be required to market the property at the original contract rental rather than its going market value. Under the facts as established in the record and according to the common law of this jurisdiction, we disagree. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Steven R. Linn, Susan D. Linn, David L. Linn, Wilma R. Linn, v. Vera E. Elrod, and Olin D. Elrod, v. Anna Lee Leinart Gross, Trustee of the Anne Lee Leinart Gross Trust
The suit presently on appeal originated by Steven R. Linn and his son, David L. Linn, and their wives filing suit against Vera E. Elrod and Olin D. Elrod, seeking a mandatory injunction requiring removal of a fence erected upon property the Linns claim to be owned by them. Upon the filing of an answer and the counter-complaint by the Elrods and the adding of a third-party, Anna Lee Leinart Gross, as a Defendant, it resolved itself into a property line dispute. |
Campbell | Court of Appeals | |
Kelly vs. TN Civil Svc. Comm.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
M1999-00138-COA-R3-CV
|
Perry | Court of Appeals | |
Dennis vs. Miceli
|
Van Buren | Court of Appeals | |
Northcott vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Westvaco vs. TN Assessment Appeals Comm, et al
|
Benton | Court of Appeals | |
Truss vs. TN Dept. of Human Svcs.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Maberry vs. Maberry
|
Jackson | Court of Appeals | |
Tomlin vs. Collegiate Technologies, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Johnson vs. Hunter
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9902-CH-00041
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9902-CH-00044
|
Cocke | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9810-CR-00358
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9906-CR-00222
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9901-CH-00070
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9812-CH-00415
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01C01-9901-CC-00027
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9810-CH-00320
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
M1997-00040-SC-WCM-CV
|
Supreme Court | ||
W1995-00004-SC-R11-PC
|
Hardin | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Colin Steen
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals |