Jewell Winningham v. Findlay Industries,
M2002-02059-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: James L. Weatherford, Senior Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employee insists the trial court erred in denying her application for reconsideration pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-241(a)(2). As discussed below, the panel has concluded that, under the circumstances, the claimant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether she is entitled to an increased award. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (22 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Vacated and Case Remanded JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C. J., and BEN H. CANTRELL, SP. J., joined. Sonya Henderson, Thomas, Henderson & Pate, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jewell Winningham Kenneth M. Switzer, Ruth, Howard, Tate & Sowell, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Findlay Industries MEMORANDUM OPINION The employee or claimant, Ms. Winningham, initiated this civil action to recover workers' compensation benefits for injuries suffered when a heavy box of materials fell on top of her while she was working for the employer, Findlay Industries. Her alleged injuries included a crushed left hand with lacerated fingers, a fractured left knee and strains to her neck, back and shoulder. At trial, the claimant contended her award of permanent partial disability benefits should exceed two and one-half times her medical impairment rating for the injury because, although she had returned to work at an hourly wage equal to or greater than what she was receiving at the time of the injury, her actual wages were less than before because she was unable to work as many hours. A medical expert estimated her permanent medical impairment to be 18 percent to the whole body, as a result of her injuries. The special judge found the return to work issue "moot" and awarded permanent disability benefits based on 4 percent to the body as a whole, an amount less than two and one-half times the claimant's medical impairment rating. That judgment was filed on May 26, 2. No appeal was taken and the judgment became final. Thereafter, the claimant petitioned the court for reconsideration pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 5-6-241(a)(2) and a "Motion to Clarify" the final judgment. The motion to clarify was argued before a different special judge. At that motion hearing, the court considered the first special judge's testimony that he did not intend to preclude reconsideration by characterizing the return to work issue as moot. Notwithstanding that undisputed testimony, the special judge dismissed the application for reconsideration "based upon the judgment order of May 26, 2." The claimant has appealed. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo without any presumption of correctness. Nutt v. Champion Intern. Corp., 98 S.W.2d 365, 367 (Tenn. 1998). Tenn. R. Civ. P. 59 and 6 specify the post trial motions available to a party who is dissatisfied with a final decision. Motions to clarify are not included. The rules of civil procedure are applicable to actions to recover workers' compensation benefits. Blake v. Plus Mark, Inc., 952 S.W.2d 413 (Tenn. 1997). In addition, the courts are not at liberty to issue advisory decisions. We conclude, therefore, that there is no such thing as a motion to clarify. Under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act, the right of an employee who suffers a work-related injury to recover compensation benefits from his employer is governed by the statutes in effect at the time of the injury. Nutt v. Champion Intern. Corp., 98 S.W.2d 365, 368 (Tenn. 1998). Such statutes are part of the contract of employment and the rights and responsibilities of such injured employee and his employer can only be ascertained from a consideration of those statutes as construed by the courts. Hudnall v. S. & W. Constr. Co. of Tenn., Inc., 6 Tenn. App. 743, 451 S.W.2d 858 (1969). The entire workers' compensation system of law is statutory. Vinson v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., Inc., 655 S.W.2d 931, 933 (Tenn. 1983). The Act is in the nature of an insurance policy and an action to recover the benefits provided therein is an action on a contract. Woods v. City of LaFollette, 185 Tenn. 655, 661, 27 S.W.2d 572, 574 (1948). It must be interpreted in a manner designed to protect workers and their families from the economic devastation that can follow on-the-job injuries. Nance v. State Ind., Inc., 33 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. 2). Where an injured worker is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits to the body as a whole and the pre-injury employer returns the employee to employment at a wage equal to or greater than the wage the employee was receiving at the time of the injury, the maximum permanent partial disability award that the employee may receive is two and one-half times the medical impairment rating pursuant to the provisions of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment or the Manual for Orthopedic Surgeons in Evaluating Permanent Physical -2-

Susan Green v. Leon Moore
M2002-00889-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Lee Davies
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the thirty (30)-day notice of appeal period, articulated in Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) ("Rule 4(a)"), began to run when the appellees filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the final claim between all parties in this action, or when the trial court entered an order confirming that all claims between all parties in this action had been adjudicated. The Court of Appeals held that the thirty-day period commenced on the date the appellees filed the notice of voluntary dismissal and concluded that the appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed. We granted permission to appeal and hold that the thirty-day notice of appeal period commenced on the date that the trial court entered an order confirming that all claims between all the parties had been adjudicated. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to the intermediate court for consideration of the merits of the appeal.

State of Tennessee v. Edward Clay and Timothy B. Clay
M2002-01319-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge Don R. Ash

The co-defendants pled guilty to conspiracy to sell "ecstasy," a Schedule I controlled substance. After a sentencing hearing, each received a sentence of eight years to be served in split confinement, with all but eight months on probation. The co-defendants contend that the trial court erred in not granting them full probation. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. George Mears
M2000-01663-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. S. Daniel

Following a jury trial, Defendant, George Mears, was found guilty of theft of property of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, a Class D felony. In his motion for a new trial, Defendant raised one issue, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Defendant contended that his counsel failed to adequately investigate and develop all available defense strategies and failed to adequately prepare for trial. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied Defendant's motion for a new trial. The trial court concluded that Defendant's counsel should have interviewed two witnesses prior to the day of trial but that Defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced by counsel's delayed interviews. As to all other claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court found that Defendant failed to show that his counsel's performance was deficient. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Cleophis King
W2001-01151-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge John P. Colton, Jr.

The petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that his guilty pleas were knowing and voluntary and that he received the effective assistance of counsel. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

State of Tennessee v. Dwayne A. Williams
W2002-00829-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bernie Weinman

The defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of more than 300 grams of cocaine with the intent to deliver. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a Range I standard offender to twenty years incarceration. The defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. We conclude the evidence is sufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Darryl Lee Elkins
E2001-01245-SC-R11-CD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State of Tennessee v. Darryl Lee Elkins
E2001-01245-SC-R11-CD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State of Tennessee v. Darryl Lee Elkins
E2001-01245-SC-R11-CD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State of Tennessee v. Maurice Whitlock
E2002-01388-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Stephen M. Bevil

Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant pled guilty to aggravated assault, a Class C felony and received a three-year sentence with the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered that the defendant serve his three-year sentence in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The defendant now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by failing to grant the defendant probation or alternative sentencing. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In Re: Crystal Michelle Moats
E2002-01635-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: William T. Denton
This is a paternity case. Following DNA testing, the parties agreed that Randy L. Garner ("Father") is the biological father of Crystal Michelle Moats (DOB: August 13, 1985) ("the child"). The issues remaining before the trial court were "current support, past due support, and medical payments." Following a bench trial, the court addressed these issues. As pertinent to this appeal, the trial court awarded Mother $1,000 as support for the child from her date of birth to the date of filing of the paternity petition, i.e., September 18, 2000. Mother appeals, contending that the trial court erred in setting the amount of retroactive support for the period prior to the filing of the petition. We vacate the trial court's award of $1,000 and remand for further proceedings.

State of Tennessee v. Kevin Lee Pennell
M2001-01863-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steve R. Dozier
The defendant was found in criminal contempt of court for violating a court order by operating a motor vehicle after his driving privileges had been lost for one year, and received a ten-day jail sentence. He raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether a trial judge can revoke a Tennessee driver’s license; and (2) whether he was in contempt for driving his vehicle the same day and after he had lost his license. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Kevin Lee Pennell - Dissenting
M2001-01863-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steve R. Dozier
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the Defendant’s conviction for criminal contempt of court should be affirmed. While I agree that the trial court did have the authority to suspend the Defendant’s driver’s license, I do not believe that the Defendant was sufficiently placed on notice that his conduct of driving a car could result in his being held in contempt.

In Re: Estate of James H. Williams
M2000-02434-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey S. Bivins
This case began as four separate cases which were consolidated. All four cases arose from the divorce of James Hollister Williams and Kathyrn L. H. Williams, his untimely death, and the probate and distribution of assets in his sizeable estate. The trial court upheld the validity of the divorce by denying Ms. Williams relief under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 60.02, awarded several annuities to Ms. Williams based on her status as the named beneficiary, ordered her to pay the estate taxes resulting from those annuities, and approved part of a claim filed by Ms. Williams against the Estate, but denied part. We affirm the decisions of the trial court upholding the validity of the divorce and awarding the annuities to Ms. Williams, but vacate the order granting the Estate a judgment against Ms. Williams for the estate taxes on the annuities. We also affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the trial court with respect to the claim against the Estate, and hold that the entire claim should have been denied.

State of Tennessee v. Gregory Lance
M2001-02507-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Charles Lee

Defendant, Gregory Lance, appeals his convictions in the Putnam County Criminal Court for two counts of first degree premeditated murder, especially aggravated burglary, and arson. For the first degree murder convictions, the trial court imposed two concurrent sentences of life imprisonment. For the especially aggravated burglary conviction and arson conviction, defendant was sentenced to serve eight years and three years respectively, to be served concurrently with his life sentences. In this direct appeal, defendant argues: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial; (2) the trial court erred in denying his requested jury instruction regarding circumstantial evidence; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. After a careful review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Sammie Don Logue
M2001-02497-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Stella L. Hargrove

The Maury County Grand Jury indicted the defendant for selling less than 0.5 grams of cocaine, and following a trial, a Maury County jury convicted the defendant of the casual exchange of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced him to eleven months, twenty-nine days' incarceration and suspended all but forty-five days of the sentence. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred by refusing to allow him to introduce evidence concerning the source of the cocaine and by denying him full probation. We find no error by the trial court and therefore affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.

State of Tennessee v. Marcus Tramane Green
M2002-01810-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Judge John H. Gasaway, III

The defendant, Marcus Tramane Green, appeals the sentence imposed by the Montgomery County Circuit Court following his guilty pleas to especially aggravated robbery, a Class A felony, and aggravated burglary, a Class C felony. The trial court sentenced him to respective concurrent terms of seventeen years as a Range I, violent offender and four and one-half years as a Range I, standard offender to be served in the Department of Correction. The defendant contends that his sentences are excessive, arguing that the trial court misapplied enhancement factors and failed to apply certain mitigating factors. We affirm the effective seventeen-year sentence imposed by the trial court.

Nannie Sneed v. The Estate of Marie Bright Witherspoon, Deceased, James Morton, Senior, et al.
M2002-00237-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: David Loughry
This appeal involves a claim filed against an estate for personal services rendered to a decedent. The lower court granted the estate's motion to dismiss, finding that the claim was time barred, the claimant had received compensation for her services, and there was no evidence of "fraud, tort, deceit, or concealment." The parties raise multiple issues on appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm

State of Tennessee v. Katrina A. Callahan
E2002-00926-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Jerry Beck

The defendant appeals her Sullivan County conviction, pursuant to a bench trial, of tampering with or fabricating evidence. On appeal, the defendant challenges only the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. Because we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, we reverse the conviction and dismiss the charge.

Dock Walker v. State of Tennessee
E2002-02162-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Ray L. Jenkins

Dock Walker appeals from the Knox County Criminal Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. He claims that the court should not have dismissed the petition without appointing counsel and affording him the opportunity to amend the petition. He also claims that based upon due process principles, his petition should not be barred by the statute of limitations. Because the lower court properly discerned that the petitioner had not presented a timely claim for relief, we affirm.

Brenda Hicks v. John E. Hicks
W2001-02931-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris
This is a divorce case. At the time the wife filed for divorce, the parties had been married for eight months. The trial judge awarded the divorce to the wife on the grounds of adultery. The trial court also granted the wife a monetary award for "alimony in solido and as a division of the marital estate." The husband appeals. We affirm and modify. The proof at trial did not support awarding the wife the divorce on grounds of adultery, nor did it support the amount of the monetary award to the wife. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed but modified to reflect that the wife is granted the divorce on grounds of inappropriate marital conduct, and the monetary award is modified as well.

State of Tennessee v. Joshua Alan Steakley
W2001-02996-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge C. Creed McGinley

The defendant was convicted of burglary, a Class D felony, after a jury trial and was sentenced to two years, six months, with all but fifteen days suspended, and the balance to be served on supervised probation. The defendant was also ordered to pay $353.95 in restitution to North Elementary School. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred in denying full probation and ordering that he serve fifteen days in confinement. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Sarah High vs. James High
W2001-01558-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris
This case involves an appeal from the trial court's determination of Appellant's child support and alimony arrearages, as well as the denial of a request to modify a previous award of alimony and child support. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Harold Jackson v. Shelby County, Tennessee
W2002-02627-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Walter L. Evans

Property of Katie Mae High v. Champion Roofing &Amp;
W2002-01941-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos