Opinions

State of Tennessee v. Traci Marie House
M2025-01227-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert Bateman

The defendant, Traci Marie House, pled guilty to attempted possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a prior violent felony, and the trial court imposed a sentence of twelve years’ incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the defendant argues the trial court erred in denying her motion to reconsider her sentence. After reviewing the record and considering the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

LaCarl Tigg v. State of Tennessee
M2025-01894-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge James A. Turner

The petitioner, LaCarl Tigg, appeals from the Circuit Court of Rutherford County’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction DNA Analysis and his pro se motion to vacate his guilty plea which the post-conviction court treated as a petition for post-conviction relief. Upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the post-conviction court’s dismissal.

IN RE GRACELYNN H.
E2025-00466-COA-R3-PT
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Amy Kathleen Skelton

In this case involving termination of the mother’s parental rights to her minor child, the
trial court determined that two statutory grounds for termination had been proven by clear
and convincing evidence. The trial court further determined that clear and convincing
evidence demonstrated that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s
best interest. The mother has appealed.1 Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Ronnie Keith Rea
W2025-00384-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. Brent Bradberry

Defendant, Ronnie Keith Rea, appeals from his convictions for three counts of aggravated sexual battery and one count of solicitation of a minor. On appeal, he raises five issues. After a thorough review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that four of the five issues have been waived. The only preserved issue is Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, which we find legally sufficient to support his convictions. Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

Katrina Allen v. Blackbaud, INC.
W2025-01484-COA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Valerie L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

Appellant appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty claims. Appellee asks this Court to award frivolous appeal damages under Tennessee Code Annotated section 27-1-122. Discerning no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We grant Appellee its request for frivolous appeal damages.

State of Tennessee v. Chelsea Louise Smith
M2025-00955-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Larry J. Wallace

Defendant, Chelsea Louise Smith, appeals her Dickson County Circuit Court convictions for aggravated child abuse and first-degree felony murder committed in the perpetration of aggravated child abuse, for which she received sentences of fifteen years and life, respectively. Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support her convictions; that the trial court abused its discretion by excluding the proposed testimony of her expert in biomechanics; and that her constitutional right to present a defense was violated by the trial court’s exclusion of the proposed expert testimony. Following a thorough review, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Teresa Kay Nolan
M2025-00562-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge David L. Allen

Following a jury trial, Defendant, Teresa Kay Nolan, was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault and one count of reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, for which she received a total effective sentence of four years. On appeal, Defendant contends that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support her convictions for aggravated assault; (2) the trial court committed plain error by failing to provide a jury instruction on self-defense; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the State to cross-examine Defendant regarding her prior conviction for attempted impersonation of a licensed professional; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion when it permitted the State to cross-examine her regarding her violation of bond conditions. Upon review, we affirm the conviction in count 2 but remand for entry of a corrected judgment, reflecting Defendant’s conviction for reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon and imposing a concurrent one-year sentence. We affirm the judgments of conviction in counts 1 and 3 in all respects.

RODNEY HARBACK v. EDDIE'S BODY SHOP, LLC, ET AL
E2025-00447-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Kristi M. Davis
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Tom McFarland

This appeal arises from a breach of contract lawsuit following the sale of a body shop
business. Prior to the sale, the owner entered into a paint-purchasing agreement requiring
him to purchase $900,000 worth of paint over time in exchange for discounts and up-front
“pre-bate” payments. Under the paint-purchasing agreement, the paint supplier could
terminate the agreement if the business was sold without the supplier’s prior written
consent. The owner later sold his business to buyers pursuant to an asset purchase
agreement whereby the buyers agreed to take on the business’s paint-purchasing
obligations. The buyers initially kept buying paint from the same supplier but eventually
stopped. The paint supplier demanded repayment of the up-front funds from the prior
owner under his personal guarantee. The prior owner then sued the buyers, asserting that
they were required to hold him harmless. The buyers filed a counterclaim asserting that
the prior owner committed the first breach by selling the business without the paint
supplier’s consent, resulting in the buyers never receiving the expected value of the deal.
The trial court ruled in the prior owner’s favor. The buyers appeal. We affirm.

GREEN ACRES MCH, LLC V. JATEAL PENDERGRASS
E2025-00043-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Ryan M. Spitzer

This is an unlawful detainer action in which the plaintiff landlord was awarded possession
and a judgment for unpaid rent and attorney fees when the defendant lessee refused to
vacate. We now affirm on appeal.

State of Tennessee v. Nickalous Ladd A/K/A Nickalous Clark
W2025-01494-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. Campbell, Sr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Chris Craft

The Defendant, Nickalous Ladd a/k/a Nickalous Clark, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of convicted felon in possession of a firearm, a Class C felony, and was sentenced by the trial court as a Range IV career offender to fifteen years at 60% in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The sole issue the Defendant raises on appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction. Based on our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Johnny Mack Powell
E2025-01126-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Scott Green

A Knox County jury convicted the Defendant, Johnny Mack Powell, of one count of
attempted voluntary manslaughter, three counts of aggravated assault, one count of
possession of marijuana, one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, and one count of
trespassing. The trial court merged the aggravated assault convictions and sentenced the
Defendant, a Range II offender, to ten years of incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant
contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions for attempted voluntary
manslaughter and aggravated assault because he was not the first aggressor and because he
acted in self-defense. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

KNOX COUNTY TENNESSEE ET AL. v. DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS ET AL
E2026-00812-COA-T10B-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Christopher D. Heagerty Jr.

This is a recusal appeal filed by the pro se petitioner relative to the underlying delinquent
taxpayer action. Because the petitioner has not demonstrated a factual basis warranting
recusal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the motion to recuse.

Crista (Haynes) Johnston v. Donald Wayne Haynes et al.
M2024-01424-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Trial Court Judge: Judge Brody N. Kane
The appellant filed a civil suit against her adoptive parents seeking damages stemming from child sexual abuse against her for which her adoptive father pleaded guilty. After the adopted parents filed a motion for summary judgment, the trial court held a hearing 15 days after service of the motion on the appellant and later granted the motion. On appeal, the appellant raises numerous issues, including whether the trial court correctly created the record on appeal, whether recusal was necessary, and whether summary judgment was appropriate. After review, we conclude that the trial court’s premature consideration of the motion necessitates vacatur and remand the matter for further proceedings. We affirm the court in all other respects.

Jacob Lee Carney v. State of Tennessee
M2025-01775-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Matthew J. Wilson
Trial Court Judge: Judge William R. Goodman, III

Petitioner, Jacob Lee Carney, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arising from his guilty-pleaded convictions for first degree premeditated murder and attempted first degree premeditated murder, for which he received a life sentence. On appeal, Petitioner argues that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received the effective assistance of trial counsel and that his guilty plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered. After review, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Leigh Ann Champion Thweatt
M2025-01432-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword
Trial Court Judge: Judge Michael E. Spitzer

The Defendant, Leigh Ann Champion Thweatt, appeals the Lewis County Circuit Court’s revocation of her probation, arguing that the trial court erred in revoking her probation in full rather than allowing her to address her substance abuse issues on probation, contending that full revocation did not serve the ends of justice for the public or the Defendant. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Jacob Franks v. State of Tennessee
W2025-00616-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

The Defendant, Jacob Franks, was convicted by a Madison County Circuit Court jury of sexual exploitation of a minor involving fifty or more images, a Class C felony, and fifteen counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, a Class D felony. See T.C.A. § 39-17-1003(a), (d)(2025). The trial court imposed an effective six-year sentence, to be served at 100%. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of the Defendant’s roommate’s notarized written statement after the roommate invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at the trial. We conclude that the trial court erred in excluding the evidence. We affirm the judgments in Counts 5, 6,7, 8, 9,10, 11, 13, 14, and 15. We reverse the judgments in Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, and 16 and remand for a new trial on these counts.

State of Tennessee v. Sean Kirk Wagner
E2025-00637-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Hector Sanchez

An Anderson County jury convicted the Defendant, Sean Kirk Wagner, of sexual battery
by an authority figure, a Class C felony, and the trial court sentenced him to four years,
364 days of which were to be served at 100% in the county jail and the balance to be
suspended and served on supervised probation. On appeal, the Defendant contends that:
(1) when the trial court instructed the jury on sexual battery by an authority figure as a
lesser-included offense to Count 1, rape, it constructively amended the indictment; (2) the
evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction; (3) the State improperly failed to elect
specific facts to support his conviction; (4) the trial court erred when it allowed the State
to elicit testimony that the Defendant had referred to the victim and her friends as “sluts”;
and (5) the trial court erred when it did not allow the results of his polygraph test to be
admitted into evidence. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Shannon Leigh Smith v. State of Tennessee
E2025-00858-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Trial Court Judge: Judge Ryan M. Spitzer

Petitioner, Shannon Leigh Smith, appeals the denial of her post-conviction petition arguing that the post-conviction court erred in denying her claim that trial counsel was ineffective in 1) failing to uncover evidence of a detective’s sexual relationship with a State’s witness and the same detective’s termination from the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission for misconduct; 2) failing to file a motion to suppress searches of Petitioner’s cell phone and Facebook account; 3) inadequately cross-examining the victim’s sister-in-law; 4) failing to put forth evidence to support self-defense; 5) failing to call defense witnesses including an expert on battered woman syndrome; 6) and withdrawing motions to disqualify the clerk’s office and the district attorney general’s office. She further argues that she is entitled to relief based on the cumulative effect of trial counsel’s alleged errors. Following our review of the entire record, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

State of Tennessee v. Gabriel Seth Box
W2025-00274-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Tom Greenholtz
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

A Henderson County jury convicted the Defendant, Gabriel Seth Box, of first degree premeditated murder, theft of a firearm, and two counts of tampering with evidence. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of life plus six years. On appeal, the Defendant raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to continue the trial date so that he could present an expert witness; and (2) whether the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentencing. Upon our review, we conclude that the Defendant’s motion to continue should have been granted, though the error was harmless in light of the expected testimony of the defense expert. We also conclude that the case should be remanded for reconsideration of consecutive sentencing under the factors outlined in State v. Wilkerson, 905 S.W.2d 933 (Tenn. 1995). Accordingly, we respectfully affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case for reconsideration of the issues related to consecutive sentencing.

State of Tennessee v. Kyle Golden
W2025-00959-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jennifer Fitzgerald

The Defendant, Kyle Golden, entered a guiltyplea to one count of aggravated assaultand three counts of child abuse. The Shelby County Criminal Court accepted the Defendant’s guilty plea and, following a sentencing hearing, denied the Defendant’s request for judicial diversion and imposed an effective sentence of five years’ supervised probation. The Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his request for judicial diversion. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Terrance B. Smith v. State of Tennessee
W2025-00898-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Trial Court Judge: Judge A. Blake Neill

Petitioner, Terrance B. Smith, appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of a motion to reopen his post-conviction proceeding. Because the notice of appeal in this case fails to satisfy the requirements for an application for permission to appeal pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-117(c), we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

William Rolandus Keel v. Robert Adams, Warden
W2025-00356-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Trial Court Judge: Judge A. Blake Neill

The Petitioner, William Rolandus Keel, pro se, was convicted of two counts of rape of a
child. In this consolidated appeal, he challenges the orders of the Hardeman County Circuit
Court summarily dismissing his petitions seeking habeas corpus relief. Upon review, we
affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Keith Andrew Baggett
W2025-01176-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph T. Howell

The Defendant, Keith Andrew Baggett, appeals from the Madison County Circuit Court’s
probation revocation of his six-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the
trial court abused its discretion by revoking his probation and ordering him to serve his
sentence in confinement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Frank Delmar Raines, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
E2025-01374-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge David R. Duggan

Frank Delmar Raines, Jr., the Petitioner, appeals from the Blount County Circuit Court’s
denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his convictions for attempted rape and
attempted aggravated kidnapping, for which he is serving an effective thirty-year sentence.
On appeal, the Petitioner claims that the post-conviction court erred in denying relief on
his ineffective assistance of counsel claims related to trial counsel’s investigation of a
State’s witness and counsel’s decision not to call character witnesses at the sentencing
hearing. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

State of Tennessee v. William Lavell Nelson
E2025-01642-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword
Trial Court Judge: Judge Boyd M. Patterson

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, the Defendant, William Lavell Nelson, pled guilty
to one count of aggravated assault and received an agreed-upon sentence of ten years’
incarceration as a Range II, multiple offender. The Defendant thereafter filed a motion to
correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1, which
the trial court summarily dismissed. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court
erred by summarily dismissing his motion and by considering it as a request for relief
pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 35. Discerning no reversible error, we
affirm.