Mike Settle v. State of Tennessee
W2015-01629-CCA-R3-ECN
The Petitioner, Mike Settle, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. The State has filed a motion requesting that this court affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Following our review, we grant the State's motion and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Kyle Atkins |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/05/16 | |
Nancy M. Houston v. Rocky J. Houston
E2015-00925-COA_R3-CV
This appeal arises out of a divorce case. Due to the deficiencies in Defendant’s brief on appeal, we conclude that he waived any consideration of any issues on appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Originating Judge:Judge Larry Michael Warner |
Roane County | Court of Appeals | 02/05/16 | |
Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. Shaun Dunlap et al.
E2015-00413-COA_R3-CV
This case presents a question regarding insurance coverage under liability and umbrella policies issued by plaintiff Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company to Jerry Dale Robertson and Sherry Ann Robertson. In July 2012, the Robertsons‘ house sitter and close family friend, Shaun Dunlap, used Dale Robertson‘s 2011 Ford Ranger pickup truck (the insured vehicle), on a personal errand to pick up a friend. On the return trip, the insured vehicle crossed the center line of the road, causing a head-on collision that killed three members of the Dembla family. Tennessee Farmers brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a judicial finding of no coverage under the policies because Dunlap was operating the insured vehicle without the permission of the insured. Defendant Kanika Dembla, the lone survivor in the Demblas‘ car, who had brought an underlying tort action against Dunlap, answered and argued that although Dunlap had no express permission to drive the insured vehicle, he had implied permission under the circumstances. On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to Tennessee Farmers, finding that Dunlap did not have implied permission to drive the insured vehicle while housesitting. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Chancellor Telford E. Forgety, Jr. |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 02/04/16 | |
In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR #023374
M2015-00350-SC-BAR-BP
Authoring Judge: Justice Jeffrey S. Bivins
|
Supreme Court | 02/04/16 | ||
Charles E. Webster, et ux. v. The Estate of P. H. Dorris, et al.
M2014-02230-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs purchased a home from two of the Defendants; one defendant was the contractor whose construction company built the home and the other was his wife, who had marketed the home for sale. Before and after the closing, Plaintiffs identified several defects which they desired to have corrected; some defects were remedied while others were not. Plaintiffs brought suit and, following trial, the court awarded judgment for $2,000 in favor of Plaintiffs against the construction company for breach of contract and judgment for $40,184 against the estate of the contractor and the construction company for breach of warranty; the court held that the contractor’s wife was not liable for either judgment in her individual capacity. Plaintiffs appeal, asserting that contractor’s wife was liable as partner or joint venturer with the other Defendants for breach of contract and implied warranty of workmanship and that the court erred in its award of damages and in failing to award prejudgment interest. We modify and affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Laurence M. McMillan, Jr. |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 02/04/16 | |
State of Tennessee v. Louis Orlando Harmon
M2015-00691-CCA-R3-CD
Appellant, Louis Orlando Harmon, stands convicted of theft of property valued at $1,000 or more but less than $10,000; possession of tools used to interfere with anti-theft security devices; and driving while his license was suspended. He was sentenced to six years for the theft of property offense, to a consecutive term of eleven months, twenty-nine days for the possession of tools offense, and to a concurrent term of six months for the driving offense. On appeal, he argues that the trial court committed plain error by allowing an Academy Sports and Outdoors loss prevention officer to testify about the identification of appellant and his vehicle by other employees of the store. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Roger A. Page
Originating Judge:Judge Walter C. Kurtz |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
Brett Patterson v. State of Tennessee
M2014-02477-COA-R3-CV
The State of Tennessee (“the State”) appeals the decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission (“the Claims Commission”) awarding Brett Patterson (“Patterson”) $439.10 for arts-and-crafts supplies that Patterson was required either to mail out of the prison or donate pursuant to a policy of the Turney Center Industrial Complex (“Turney Center”) where Patterson is an inmate. We find and hold that the Claims Commission does not have jurisdiction over intentional torts, and as no negligence was alleged or shown, the Claims Commission lacked jurisdiction over this case. We, therefore, vacate the decision of the Claims Commission and dismiss this case.
Authoring Judge: Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Commissioner Robert N. Hibbett |
Court of Appeals | 02/03/16 | ||
Janet Wynn Snyder v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.
E2015-00530-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the trial court's award of litigation costs, inclusive of attorney's fees, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-12-119(c) (Supp. 2015), upon granting the defendant's Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiff's action. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the defendant in the amount of $10,000, the statutory maximum, against the plaintiff and her surety. The plaintiff appeals the portion of the ruling holding the surety liable for the $10,000 judgment of litigation costs in the event the principal fails to satisfy the judgment. Having determined that the surety's cost bond explicitly referred to “costs” as defined in Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-12-120 (2009), rather than as defined in subsection -119(c), we reverse the trial court's judgment as to the surety. We affirm the trial court's judgment against the principal and remand for enforcement of that judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge:Chancellor John F. Weaver |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
Danny Blankenship Bonding Company v. State of Tennessee
W2015-00614-CCA-R3-CD
Appellant, Danny Blankenship Bonding Company, appeals the judgment of the Henderson County Circuit Court forfeiting a $3,000 bail bond in the case of criminal defendant Edward Hunt. On appeal, appellant argues that he was entitled to relief pursuant to Tennessee Code sections 40-11-139(c) and 40-11-203(a). Following our review of the parties’ briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Henderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
State of Tennessee v. Mario Thomas
W2015-00533-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Mario Thomas, appeals the sentences imposed for his guilty pleas to the offenses of aggravated robbery, attempted aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, aggravated burglary, employing a firearm in the commission of a dangerous felony, and possessing a firearm after having been convicted of a felony involving the use or attempted use of violence. The defendant's sole allegation of error is that the trial court should not have ordered his convictions for aggravated burglary and aggravated robbery to run consecutively. After a thorough review of the record, we discern no error and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
Andra Taylor v. State of Tennessee
W2015-00744-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Andra Taylor, appeals the Madison County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his 2012 convictions for aggravated burglary, employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and two counts of reckless endangerment involving a deadly weapon, for which he is serving an effective fourteen-year sentence. The Petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred by denying him relief due to the ineffective assistance of counsel in the conviction proceedings. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
Dwayne Williams v. State of Tennessee
W2014-02415-CCA-R3-PC
Petitioner, Dwayne Williams, pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual battery and was sentenced to eight years in confinement. Petitioner filed the instant petition for post-conviction relief, and following an evidentiary hearing, the post-conviction court denied relief. On appeal, petitioner argues that: (1) his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to file a motion to suppress and failed to investigate a potential plea offer; and (3) he was denied a full and fair hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claims against his first counsel. After our review of the parties' briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Roger A. Page
Originating Judge:Judge Lee V. Coffee |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
Mamie D. Fuller v. Joan C. Banks, et al.
W2015-01001-COA-R3-CV
This is a premises liability case. Appellant had rented property from Appellees for approximately one year when Appellant was injured as a result of a fall when the railing along the stairs of the premises allegedly collapsed. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees based upon its conclusion that Appellees had negated the essential element of Appellant's claim that, in order for Appellees to have been negligent in the accident, any defect in the stairs or supporting structure must have existed at the time of the execution of the lease. Discerning no error, we affirm and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge Kenny Armstrong
Originating Judge:Judge Clayburn Peeples |
Haywood County | Court of Appeals | 02/03/16 | |
City of Jackson v. Barry Walker
W2015-00621-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves an allegedly unsafe building in the City of Jackson. After a hearing, the City of Jackson’s environmental court ordered the property owner to demolish the building. The property owner appealed to circuit court. After another hearing, the circuit court declared the property a public nuisance and also ordered it demolished. The property owner appeals. He argues that the City of Jackson failed to follow the correct procedures under the city code, and therefore, he should not be required to demolish the structure. Discerning no merit in this assertion, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Originating Judge:Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 02/02/16 | |
State of Tennessee v. Katarina R. Long
M2015-01057-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Katarina R. Long, pled guilty in the Dickson County Circuit Court to theft of property valued $10,000 or more but less than $60,000 and was granted judicial diversion with the requirement that she complete three years of probation and pay $20,000 restitution. On appeal, the appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the amount of restitution when it was clear that she did not have the ability to pay it. Because we lack jurisdiction to consider her appeal, we must dismiss it.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Larry J. Wallace |
Dickson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/02/16 | |
Kevin Lee Carnett v. PNC Bank, NA
W2015-01677-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant-bank to halt foreclosure proceedings. When the bank did not answer the complaint, the plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. The trial court denied the motion for default judgment and, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint. We affirm the denial of plaintiff‟s motion for default judgment but vacate the dismissal of his complaint.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Chester County | Court of Appeals | 02/02/16 | |
Christopher Eric Tidwell v. Alicia Ann Tidwell
M2015-00376-COA-R3-CV
This appeal results from a divorce proceeding between Christopher Eric Tidwell (“Father”) and Alicia Ann Tidwell (“Mother”). On appeal, Father challenges the trial court’s determination of Mother’s income for child support purposes, the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony to Mother, and the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Mother. Having reviewed the record transmitted to us, we affirm the trial court’s determination of Mother’s income, vacate a portion of the awarded rehabilitative alimony, and modify the award of attorney’s fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Originating Judge:Judge Michael Binkley |
Hickman County | Court of Appeals | 02/02/16 | |
Kyle Kernan v. Beverly J. Kernan Nabors et al.
E2014-01679-COA-R3-CV
Post-divorce, a guardian was appointed for two minor children while their mother received treatment for substance abuse. The guardian, the half-brother of the minors, sought child support from both parents. The guardian alleges, inter alia, the trial court abused its discretion by adjusting for tax deductions before calculating the mother's gross income for child support due and by allowing her credit for support in kind and purchases of necessities. We affirm the trial court's findings.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge Bill Swann |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/01/16 | |
Randy L. Fielder v. Southern Health Partners et al.
M2014-01819-COA-R3-CV
The plaintiff filed the instant action regarding injuries he allegedly received while in the custody of the Robertson County Detention Center. The trial court dismissed the action sua sponte based on multiple grounds, including untimeliness pursuant to the applicable statute of limitations. The plaintiff filed a motion seeking alteration of the order of dismissal. The trial court denied the request by a handwritten notation supplied on the face of the motion. The plaintiff appealed. Having determined that there is no valid, final order in this matter, we conclude that the appeal must be dismissed due to this Court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge:Judge Ross H. Hicks |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 02/01/16 | |
Cecilia Thompson v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
W2015-00075-SC-R3-WC
An employee sustained a compensable injury to her shoulder. She was able to return to work in a transitional modified job and settled her claim within the one and one-half times impairment cap. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-241(d)(1)(A). Her employer offered her a permanent job with accommodations for her medical restrictions. The employee did not accept the position and was terminated. She sought reconsideration of her settlement. The trial court found that the employer had acted reasonably and that the employee had a meaningful return to work. The trial court, therefore, declined to award additional benefits. The employee has appealed. The appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Paul G. Summers
Originating Judge:Judge Charles C. McGinley |
Hardin County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/01/16 | |
State of Tennessee v. Stacey Green
M2015-00323-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Stacey Green, appeals from his convictions for aggravated robbery, burglary, aggravated assault, and three counts of facilitation of aggravated robbery. The Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence relating to a victim’s pretrial identification of the Defendant in a photographic lineup and that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions. Following a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas W. Graham |
Marion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/01/16 | |
In re Carrington H. et al.
M2014-00453-SC-R11-PT
We granted review in this case to decide (1) whether an indigent parent’s right to appointed counsel in a parental termination proceeding includes the right to challenge an order terminating parental rights based on ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals must review any ground the trial court relied on to terminate parental rights when a parent fails to raise all grounds for termination on appeal. We hold that parents are constitutionally entitled to fundamentally fair procedures in parental termination proceedings. Nevertheless, this constitutional mandate does not require us to adopt a procedure by which parents may collaterally attack orders terminating parental rights based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Additionally, we hold that appellate courts must review a trial court’s findings regarding all grounds for termination and whether termination is in a child’s best interests, even if a parent fails to challenge these findings on appeal. Having reviewed the record on appeal in accordance with these holdings, we affirm the trial court’s judgment terminating the mother’s parental rights.
Authoring Judge: Justice Cornelia A. Clark
Originating Judge:Judge George L. Lovell |
Maury County | Supreme Court | 01/29/16 | |
Theresa A. Green v. William Phillip Green
M2014-02278-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce case, the wife proceeding pro se appeals the division of marital property and the trial court’s denial of her request for alimony. She also appeals the trial court’s award of court costs. She elected not to file a transcript or a statement of the evidence. Because the wife’s first two issues are factual in nature, the lack of transcript or statement of evidence prevents us from reaching the substance of the issues raised by the wife. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in assessing court costs. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We also find that the appeal is frivolous.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge Ross H. Hicks |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/16 | |
National Coal, LLC v. Brent Galloway
E2015-00723-COA-R3-CV
This action concerns a petition to set aside a tax sale as void for lack of notice to the original property owner. The purchaser of the property filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the original owner was not entitled to notice, that the petitioner received actual notice as the current owner, and that the petition was untimely. The petitioner countered with a motion for summary judgment. Following a hearing, the trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner received actual notice of the sale and that the time for filing such actions had passed. The petitioner appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Chancellor Elizabeth C. Asbury |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/16 | |
In re Carrington H. et al - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part
M2014-00453-SC-R11-PT
The Court has decided that an indigent parent has the right to assistance of counsel—but not the right to effective assistance of counsel—in a parental termination proceeding. I believe that the vast majority of lawyers provide competent representation as required by our Rules of Professional Conduct. See Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 8, RPCs 1.1 & 1.3. But in those rare situations where a lawyer makes a mistake or fails to do his or her duty to such an extent that the termination proceeding is not fundamentally fair, I favor providing the parent with an opportunity to seek relief. In my view, providing counsel for an indigent parent but not requiring counsel to render effective representation is an empty gesture.
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge:Judge George L. Lovell |
Maury County | Supreme Court | 01/29/16 |