Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Lester Douglas Giles
E1999-02236-CCA-R3-CD
On June 21, 1999, the defendant pled guilty in the Monroe County Criminal Court to attempted rape and was sentenced to four years as a Range I standard offender. The sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation. On July 6, 1999, a probation violation was issued, alleging that the defendant had violated his probation by having contact with the victim's family. Following a hearing on August 16, 1999, the trial court ruled that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation, a ruling which the defendant timely appealed. Based upon our review, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and reinstate the defendant's probation.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Carroll L. Ross |
Monroe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Larry Parish vs. Robert Marquis
W1999-02629-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs Larry E. Parrish and Larry E. Parrish, P.C. (collectively, "Parrish"), appeal the trial court's final summary judgment that dismissed Parrish's claim for malicious prosecution against Defendants Robert S. Marquis, McCampbell & Young, P.C., Ronald C. Koksal, and Butler, Vines & Babb, PLLC. The Defendants also have raised an issue on appeal, contending that the trial court erred in denying their motions to dismiss for improper venue. We conclude that the Shelby County Circuit Court was not the proper venue for Parrish's malicious prosecution claim. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of Parrish's malicious prosecution claim on the alternative ground of improper venue.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:James E. Swearengen |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Taylor vs. Campbell
M2000-00217-COA-R3-CV
Daniel B. Taylor filed a petition for declaratory judgment against the Commissioner and several other employees of the Tennessee Department of Correction, alleging that he is entitled to various sentence reduction credits and that his sentence is void and illegal. The trial court dismissed Taylor's petition. We vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Howell vs. Howell
M1999-00753-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce case, Talisa Gayle Kelly, formerly Howell, ("Wife") filed a petition seeking to increase child support and to enforce other provisions of the judgment of divorce. The trial court ordered Gary Morris Howell ("Husband") to pay Wife the balance due her for her interest in the former marital residence. It further found Husband in contempt for failing to maintain a life insurance policy for the benefit of the parties' minor child and ordered him to pay Wife an amount approximating what he would have paid in insurance premiums had he maintained the policy as required by the divorce judgment. Wife was also awarded half of her attorney's fees. We reverse the trial court's award of the unpaid premiums; in all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Lineberry vs. Locke
M1999-02169-COA-R3-CV
A citizen whose private photographs and video tapes were seized in the execution of a search warrant sued the sheriff and a deputy for invasion of privacy and outrageous conduct. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants at the close of the plaintiff's proof. Because we agree that the plaintiff did not prove either cause of action, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Wilson vs. Wilson
M1999-02045-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from the trial court's refusal to modify Mr. Wilson's child support obligation after he was terminated from his place of employment. We reverse the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Freethy vs. Maconi
M2000-00107-COA-R9-CV
This Rule 9 interlocutory appeal consists of the singular issue of whether Steven Maconi has sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee for it to exercise personal jurisdiction over him, thus requiring him to defend a paternity action brought in Tennessee. The Trial Court held that Mr. Maconi had sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee, and thus, it could exercise personal jurisdiction over him. We reverse the finding of the Trial Court and hold that Mr. Maconi does not have sufficient minimum contacts with the state of Tennessee for it to exercise personal jurisdiction over him.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:L. Raymond Grimes |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 07/31/00 | |
| Blankinship vs. TDOC
M1999-02381-COA-R3-CV
A prisoner filed a petition to compel the Department of Correction to establish a mandatory parole date for his benefit. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| William Lavern Davis vs. State
M2000-00341-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner argues that in finding that his trial counsel was not ineffective and denying his post-conviction petition, the petitioner appeals from the trial court's denial of his post-conviction petition. He argues that the trial court erred by finding that his trial counsel was not ineffective. The trial court's order is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:William Charles Lee |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Roger Harris vs. State
E1999-02056-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, convicted of first degree murder and reckless endangerment, filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief in March 1995. The petition was amended several times, first by the petitioner, then by the public defender, and ultimately by private counsel. The trial court summarily dismissed the petition by order because it was not "verified by any oath or affirmation." We reverse and remand, holding that the original petition was filed under a statute that did not require verification by oath or affirmation and, in the alternative, that the affirmation executed by the private counsel is sufficient under the current law.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Unicoi County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Edward T. Flye
M1999-01183-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Edward T. Flye, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him of aggravated burglary and evading arrest. Because the evidence is adequate to support the convictions, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Tuttle vs. Tuttle
M1999-01578-COA-R3-CV
In a previous appeal, this divorce case was remanded to the trial court for a determination of whether the parties had any marital property and, if so, for the trial court to make an equitable division thereof. From the trial court's final decree in compliance with the order of remand, defendant appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Michael F. Maraschiello
M1997-00049-CCA-R10-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Robert W. Wedemeyer |
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Mary Zelek v. Flagstar System,
M1999-00269-WC-R3-CV
The employer contends the trial judge erred by accrediting the expert medical testimony of a non-approved physician chosen by the employee, or her attorney, and that the award of permanent partial disability benefits is excessive.
Authoring Judge: Loser, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:J. O. Bond, Judge |
Wilson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/28/00 | |
| Phelps vs. TDOC
M1999-02109-COA-R3-CV
Petitioner/Appellant, a state prisoner, filed his petition for common law certiorari asserting that he was being unconstitutionally and illegally incarcerated by the state and had not been given proper credits under various sentence reduction credit statutes and policies. The trial court granted summary judgment and Petitioner appealed. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Jeffrey Harris vs. Percy Pitzer
W2000-00187-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the incarceration of the Appellant in the state of Tennessee pursuant to a contract between the Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Corrections Corporation of America. The Appellant filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief in the Circuit Court of Hardeman County. The trial court entered an order granting the Appellee's Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Appellant appeals from the dismissal of his Petition filed in the Circuit Court of Hardeman County. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Green vs. Innovative Recovery Services, Inc.
M1999-02227-COA-R3-CV
The attorney for a woman who had been injured in an auto accident claimed that his services entitled him to a portion of the subrogation interest asserted by TennCare against the settlement proceeds. The trial court dismissed his claim. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Robin Vanhoose
W1999-00708-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted by a Hardin County jury of aggravated assault and received an eight-year sentence as a Range II multiple offender. He now appeals his conviction alleging (1) the indictment does not state an offense; and (2) the evidence is insufficient to support aggravated assault. We conclude the indictment adequately informed the defendant of the offense charged, and the evidence presented at trial was sufficient for the jury to conclude he was guilty of aggravated assault. Thus, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Selina Harrelson
W1999-00521-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Selina G. Harrelson, was convicted of possession of one-half gram or more of cocaine with intent to sell. She contends that the officer did not have probable cause to search the truck with the drug detection dog; that the evidence is insufficient to show that she possessed crack cocaine; and that the trial court should have imposed a sentence alternative to incarceration. We hold that the defendant lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in the truck to contest the search and that, in any event, the officer had probable cause. We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court properly sentenced the defendant to incarceration. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Thomas Rodgers, v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
M1999-02585-COA-R3-CV
In this Declaratory Judgment plaintiff sought statutory credits on his prison sentences. The Trial court granted the State summary judgment. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Herschel Pickens Franks, J.
Originating Judge:Hon. Carol L. Mccoy, Chancellor |
Davidson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Carl Couch
W1999-00645-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his split sentence of 60 days confinement plus 1 year and 4 months of probation for the offense of reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon. The defendant contends in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying him total probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| In re: Adoption of a male child, Derrick Douglas Duncan
M1999-01713-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a petition by prospective adoptive parents for termination of parental rights, temporary guardianship, and for adoption of the minor child of the defendant father. In a non-jury trial, at the conclusion of petitioner's proof, the trial court found that they had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant father had abandoned the child and dismissed the petition. The prospective adoptive parents have appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Smith County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Rodgers vs. TDOC
M1999-02585-COA-R3-CV
In this Declaratory Judgment plaintiff sought statutory credits on his prison sentences. The Trial court granted the State summary judgment. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. John Wayne Gray
M1999-01615-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, John Wayne Gray, appeals as of right from his conviction of the sale of a schedule II controlled substance. On appeal, he argues (1) that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion for acquittal or directed verdict because the State failed to establish circumstances and facts that would provide for a reasonable assurance of the identity of the evidence and because the State failed to establish an unbroken chain of custody; (2) that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury verdict; and (3) that the trial court erred in sentencing the Defendant to a mid-range sentence as a Range III offender. We find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Daniel Joe James
M1999-1423-CCA-R3-CD
On September 9, 1998, the Defendant, Daniel Joe James, was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The Defendant was convicted by a jury of simple possession of a controlled substance. He received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days probation and was fined $2,500.00. The Defendant now challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. On appeal, the State has conceded that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction. After a careful examination of the record, we agree that there is insufficient evidence against the Defendant to support a conviction. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 |