Randall Holt, et al. v. Billy Kirk, et al.
W2017-00847-COA-R3-CV
Residential property owners sued their neighbors alleging multiple causes of action, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, false arrest, and assault. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, which was approved by the trial court. On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying pre-trial motions for summary judgment, excluding relevant evidence at trial, determining a potential witness was competent to testify, refusing to grant a directed verdict or a mistrial, failing to order a new trial when the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and refusing to suggest a remittitur. After a careful review of the record, we find no reversible error. So we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge Jerry Stokes |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Frank Bolka, III
W2018-00798-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Joseph Frank Bolka, III, entered open guilty pleas to possession of 0.5 grams or more of methamphetamine with the intent to deliver and simple possession of marijuana, and he was sentenced to serve eight years in the Community Corrections program. The record reflects that the Defendant attempted to reserve a certified question regarding the legality of the traffic stop which led to the discovery of the drugs. Because the notice of appeal was untimely and because the record reflects that the question was not properly preserved, we dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Joe H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
Crouch Railway Consulting , LLC v. LS Energy Fabrication, LLC
M2017-02540-COA-R3-CV
The sole issue on appeal is whether a Tennessee court may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant. A Tennessee civil engineering company filed an action for breach of contract and unjust enrichment against a Texas energy company in Williamson County Chancery Court, alleging that the Texas company breached its contract with the Tennessee company by failing to pay for engineering and planning services. The defendant filed a Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court granted the motion, determining that the minimum contacts test had not been satisfied because the defendant did not target Tennessee. Additionally, the trial court determined that it would be unfair and unreasonable to require the defendant to litigate the dispute in Tennessee. This appeal followed. Relying primarily on the Tennessee Supreme Court’s reasoning in Nicholstone Book Bindery, Inc. v. Chelsea House Publishers, 621 S.W.2d 560 (Tenn. 1981), we have determined that the Texas company purposefully directed its activity toward Tennessee by engaging a Tennessee engineering company to provide customized services, which were performed primarily in Tennessee. We have also determined that it is fair and reasonable to require the Texas company to litigate the dispute in Tennessee. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s decision to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Originating Judge:Chancellor Joseph A. Woodruff |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
Corey Demonn Scott v. State of Tennessee
W2018-01126-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Corey Demonn Scott, appeals from the Madison County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his 2016 guilty pleas to second degree murder and to vandalism, for which he is serving an effective eighteen-year sentence. The Petitioner contends that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
Evangeline Webb, et al. v. Milton E. Magee, Jr., et al.
W2018-01305-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a re-filed health care liability action in which the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the health care liability act. The trial court upheld the constitutionality of the statutes and granted summary judgment in this action because the initial suit was not filed within the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge Robert Samual Weiss |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
Charis Lynn Jetton v. State of Tennessee
W2018-01857-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Charis Lynn Jetton, appeals from the Fayette County Circuit Court’s denial of her petition for post-conviction relief from her 2016 guilty pleas to voluntary manslaughter and to possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, for which she is serving an effective ten-year sentence. The Petitioner contends that she received the ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge J. Weber McCraw |
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
Regions Commercial Equipment Finance, LLC v. Richards Aviation Inc., et al.
W2018-00033-COA-R3-CV
In this appeal, the trial court granted summary judgment to a bank that financed the debtor’s purchase of an aircraft; the court also dismissed the debtor’s counterclaim based on fraudulent inducement, fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation, and the debtor’s motion seeking damages from the Receiver that had been appointed by the court to manage and sell the aircraft. We vacate the order granting summary judgment to the bank and remand the case for further consideration and entry of an order that complies with Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56.04; in all other respects we affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/30/19 | |
In Re Laura F.
M2017-01767-COA-R3-PT
A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child. The juvenile court found by clear and convincing evidence three statutory grounds for termination of parental rights: abandonment by willful failure to support and by willful failure to visit and persistence of conditions. The court also found by clear and convincing evidence that termination of mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interest. Upon our review of the record, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge Diana F. Monroe |
Overton County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
James Kirby v. Memphis Light Gas & Water
W2017-02390-COA-R3-CV
The driver of a delivery truck was injured when the delivery truck collided with a utility truck. The trial court determined that the utility company was 70% at fault and the delivery driver was 30% at fault. The court awarded the delivery driver $105,000 in damages. On appeal, the utility company argues that the trial court erred in including future medical expenses in its calculation of damages and that the delivery driver failed to mitigate his damages. We find no error in the trial court’s award of damages and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Judge Jerry Stokes |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Derek Cunningham
W2018-02075-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Derek Cunningham, appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. Because Defendant has failed to state a colorable claim for relief, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge W. Mark Ward |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Patrick Bumpus
W2018-01034-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Patrick Bumpus, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary. The State concedes that the trial court erred by summarily denying the motion. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing.
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge R. Lee Moore, Jr. |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
Paige Diane Griffith v. Richard John Griffith
M2018-01245-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a divorce proceeding. The only issues raised on appeal relate to the trial court’s awards of alimony and child support. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Deanna B. Johnson |
Lewis County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
Cannon and Associates, LLC v. Hillcrest Healthcare, LLC
M2018-00929-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the enrollment of a foreign judgment in Tennessee. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, effectively enrolling the foreign judgment, rendered in Florida, pursuant to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution and Tennessee’s Uniform Foreign Judgment Enforcement Act. On appeal, the defendant argues that the granting of summary judgment was improper because the Florida court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant. Because we conclude that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved, the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff is vacated and remanded for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Chancellor Ellen H. Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
Venture Holdings, LLC v. Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee, by and through Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals
M2018-01838-COA-R3-CV
This case involves an appeal to the Davidson County Chancery Court (“trial court”) of an administrative zoning decision denying an application for a special exception permit. In January 2018, the petitioner, Venture Holdings, LLC (“Venture”), filed an application with the respondent, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, acting by and through the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (“the Board”), for a special exception permit to build a waste transfer station at a particular location. Following an administrative hearing, the Board denied Venture’s application upon finding that Venture had failed to meet the applicable requirements set forth by the Zoning Code for Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County (“Metro Code”). Venture, through a petition for writ of certiorari, appealed the Board’s decision to the trial court, alleging that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial or material evidence and was illegal, arbitrary, and capricious. Following a hearing, the trial court found substantial and material evidence to support the Board’s decision and affirmed the Board’s denial of Venture’s application. Venture timely appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge:Chancellor Anne C. Martin |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/19 | |
In Re: O.M. Et Al.
E2018-01463-COA-R3-PT
Department of Children’s Services filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of father, J.M., with respect to his children, O.M. and K.M. The court held clear and convincing evidence exists to terminate father’s parent rights on the ground of abandonment by an incarcerated parent, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(1), and for failure to manifest an ability to parent, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1- 113(g)(14). By the same quantum of proof, the court held that termination is in the children’s best interest. Father appeals. We affirm
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Robert M. Estep |
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 04/26/19 | |
Joseph Mark Whitmore v. State of Tennessee
M2018-01526-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Joseph Mark Whitmore, appeals from the Putnam County Criminal Court’s denial of post-conviction relief, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in advising him that he could withdraw his guilty plea within thirty days of his sentencing hearing and in failing to adequately represent him at sentencing. Upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Gary McKenzie |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/26/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Shannon James Keener
M2018-00730-CCA-R3-CD
The Appellant, Shannon James Keener, pled guilty in the Davidson County Criminal Court to rape and received a ten-year sentence to be served in confinement. On appeal, the Appellant claims that his sentence is excessive and that the trial court erred by refusing to grant his request for alternative sentencing. Based upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Steve Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/26/19 | |
In Re Antoine J., et al.
W2017-02456-COA-R3-JV
The mother of a three-year-old child appeals the trial court’s ruling that she committed severe child abuse under Tennessee Code Annotated § 37-1-102(b)(27). The Department of Children’s Services (the “Department”) received a referral from a Memphis hospital after determining that the child had suffered a fractured femur along with other injuries that were not usually caused by normal childhood play. Following its initial investigation, the Department determined that the injuries were the result of abuse by the mother’s boyfriend. Subsequently, the Department filed a petition against the mother and her boyfriend to declare her children dependent and neglected and the victims of severe child abuse. A juvenile court magistrate and the juvenile court judge each found the children dependent and neglected and that the mother committed severe child abuse by failing to protect the child from her boyfriend’s abuse and failing to timely seek medical attention for the child. Following an appeal, the circuit court made the same findings. The mother appeals the determination that she committed severe child abuse. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Gina C. Higgins |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/26/19 | |
U.S. Bank National Association, et al. v. Marce Harvey Ingram, et al.
W2018-01689-COA-R3-CV
This a declaratory judgment action in which the plaintiff sought to reform a deed that included an incorrect description of the property at issue. The plaintiff alleged that a mutual mistake had occurred and that the parties to the transaction intended to encumber a 2-acre tract of land, not a 0.7-acre tract of land as described in the deed. The plaintiff claimed that the land had also been improperly released. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge Clayburn Peeples |
Gibson County | Court of Appeals | 04/26/19 | |
John O. Threadgill v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee
E2018-01211-SC-R3-BP
After attorney John O. Threadgill was convicted of tax evasion, this Court ordered that the Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) initiate proceedings to determine his final discipline. A hearing panel (“Panel”) imposed a final discipline of disbarment. Mr. Threadgill sought review of the Panel’s judgment in the Knox County Chancery Court, and the chancery court affirmed Mr. Threadgill’s disbarment. Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 1.3, Mr. Threadgill has appealed the chancery court’s judgment to this Court. In this appeal, he argues: (1) that the Panel and the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose disbarment; (2) that the judgment was unsupported by substantial and material evidence; and (3) that the judgment is contrary to the intent of the American Bar Association guidelines. Following a thorough review of the record and the applicable legal authorities, we affirm the judgment of the Knox County Chancery Court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Roger A. Page
Originating Judge:Chancellor Douglas T. Jenkins |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 04/25/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Eugene Blaylock
M2017-02136-CCA-R3-CD
Following a trial, a jury convicted Defendant, Bobby Eugene Blaylock, of kidnapping, aggravated kidnapping, attempted rape, robbery, and theft valued at more than $1,000 but less than $2,500, for which the trial court imposed a total effective sentence of forty-four years’ incarceration. On appeal, Defendant asserts that the trial court erred by failing to find that the mitigating factor found in Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-304(b)(2) applied to Defendant’s case. The State cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by finding that the State’s “Notice of Defendant’s Status as a Repeat Violent Offender” (the “State’s Notice”) was deficient and by failing to sentence Defendant as a repeat violent offender. Following a thorough review, we modify Defendant’s sentence for aggravated kidnapping to life without possibility of parole. We remand for the entry of an amended judgment sentencing Defendant, as a repeat violent offender, to life without possibility of parole in Count 2 and for the trial court to impose a sentence on the merged conviction of kidnapping in Count 1. In all other respects, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge David D. Wolfe |
Cheatham County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/25/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Calvera
E2018-00982-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Christopher Calvera, was indicted for retaliation for past action, a Class E felony; and assault, a Class A misdemeanor. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-101, -16-510. Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of the retaliation for past action charge and acquitted of the assault charge. The trial court later imposed a four-year sentence for the retaliation conviction. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; and (2) the trial court committed plain error in denying his motion for a mistrial alleging that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct during its closing argument. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge James L. Gass |
Sevier County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/25/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Timothy Wayne Johnson
M2017-01672-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Timothy Wayne Johnson, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his motion filed pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1, in which Defendant alleged that his split confinement sentence was illegal because the judgment form designated his confinement in the Tennessee Department of Correction, rather than the local jail or workhouse. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Judge Larry B. Stanley, Jr. |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/25/19 | |
James C. Gekas v. HCA Health Services Of Tennessee, Inc., Et Al.
M2019-00535-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from an order granting the defendants’ Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Because the plaintiff did not file his notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the order as required by Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a), we dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Senior Judge William B. Acree |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/25/19 | |
State of Tennessee v. Bryan Keith Thomas
E2017-02247-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Ryan Kevin Thomas, was indicted for first degree premeditated murder; first degree felony murder; and theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1000; a Class E felony. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-202, -14-103, -14-105 (2010). Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of the lesser-included offense of second degree murder, a Class A felony, and of the charged offenses of first degree felony murder and theft. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-210 (2010). The trial court later merged the second degree murder conviction into the first degree felony murder conviction and imposed a total effective sentence of life. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the Defendant’s convictions for first degree felony murder and second degree murder; (2) the trial court erred in admitting an autopsy photograph; (3) the trial court erred in excluding hearsay testimony from a proposed witness for the defense; and (4) the trial court erred in approving the jury’s verdict as the thirteenth juror.1 Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge David R. Duggan |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/25/19 |