| George Tipton vs. Axis Fabrication & Machine Co.
E2001-00258-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Margaret Tobitt vs. Bridgestone/Fireston, Inc.
M2000-00279-SC-WCM-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Supreme Court | 08/29/01 | |
| Lonnie Wilder vs. Leslie Wilder
E2000-03184-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce case, the Trial Court awarded husband attorney's fees against wife. On appeal, we reverse.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:John D. Mcafee |
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Myron Hubbard vs. Sandi Hubbard
E2001-00110-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court granted appellee Judgement before the 30 days to answer process provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure had expired. On appeal, we vacate and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| New Covenant Baptist Church vs. Panther Sark
E2000-02930-COA-R3-CV
In this suit New Covenant Baptist Church seeks a declaration that certain restrictions applicable to Technology Park West subdivision do not preclude New Covenant from using one of the lots for driveway purposes to other unrestricted property owned by New Covenant outside the subdivision. Panther Sark, a partnership, and certain other owners of lots in the subdivision were named as Defendants and they filed a counter-complaint seeking a declaration to the contrary. The Trial Court found in favor of New Covenant. We reverse and hold in favor of the partnership and other owners of lots in the subdivision.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Rouse Construction Co. vs. Interstate Steel Corp.
E2001-00242-COA-R3-CV
This is a case wherein the Plaintiff/Appellant, Rouse Construction Company, seeks damages for breach of contract from the Defendant/Appellee, Interstate Steel Corporation. The Chancellor found that there was no meeting of minds between the parties as to essential contract terms and, therefore, ordered that Rouse's claim be denied. The Chancellor further determined that Interstate should be allowed a judgment in the amount of $19,090.00 for materials and plans delivered to Rouse. We concur in the determination of the Chancellor and affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Sharon J. Bell |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Jeffrey Miller v. State of Tennessee
E2000-01192-CCA-R3-CD
Jeffrey Miller appeals the Meigs County Criminal Court's dismissal of his petitions for writ of error coram nobis and writ of habeas corpus. Both petitions seek redress for Miller's grievance that he has been required to serve felony sentences in the Department of Correction, although his plea agreements designated the location of confinement to be the Meigs County Jail. Because neither coram nobis nor habeas corpus relief is available to address a concern of this nature and because the petitioner's claims are factually unfounded, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge E. Eugene Eblen |
Meigs County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Ralph D. Cooper
W2000-02612-CCA-R3-CD
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for reinstatement of a motor vehicle operator's license pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 55-10-615(b). The court ruled that a subsequent conviction for driving without a license precluded the court from restoring the petitioner's driving privileges for a period of three years after the new conviction. After a careful review, we hold that the court incorrectly concluded it did not have discretion to grant driving privileges and remand to the court for reconsideration of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge W. Fred Axley |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Carl O. Koella, Jr. vs. Fred McHargue, et ux
E2001-00544-COA-R3-CV
Defendants have right of first refusal on tract of real property. The Trial Court held that the giving of a quitclaim deed did not trigger the right of first refusal. Defendants appealed, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| CH-00-1207-2
CH-00-1207-2
Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Scarlett/Patrick Spencer vs. James Aydlotte
W2001-00995-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit for the termination of parental rights. The Appellants filed a petition in the Chancery Court of Gibson County to terminate the Appellee's parental rights to his child. Following a hearing, the trial court entered an order denying the Appellants' petition. The Appellants appeal the trial court's order denying the Appellants' petition to terminate the Appellee's parental rights. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis |
Gibson County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Paul Seaton, et al vs. Richard Rowe, et al
E2000-02304-COA-R3-CV
Monroe County -This is an action for specific performance of an option agreement for the sale of some farmland acreage, from which a 60-acre tract was excepted. The trial court dismissed the action, holding that the option agreement did not satisfy the statute of frauds because the description of the excepted property was inadequate and that the deficiency could not be remedied by parol evidence. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a motion to "reopen the proof" to introduce evidence to support reformation of the description of the excepted property. The motion was denied. The plaintiffs appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) finding that the option agreement did not satisfy the statute of frauds; (2) refusing to consider parol evidence of the location of the excepted property; and (3) refusing to "reopen the proof" on the issue of reformation. The defendants argue that the appeal is frivolous. We find that the option agreement is sufficiently definite to satisfy the statute of frauds and that parol evidence should have been admitted to locate the excepted property. We therefore vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:John B. Hagler, Jr. |
Monroe County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Mark A. Doolen, Jr.
M2000-01953-CCA-R3-CD
In this appeal, Mark A. Doolen, Jr. challenges the order of the Dickson County Circuit Court requiring the appellant's payment of restitution in the amount of $6,611.76 for his vandalism of two antique automobiles. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the appellant should have filed his appeal with the Tennessee Court of Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Allen W. Wallace |
Dickson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| Linda Greene vs. Dr. Woody Stinson
E2001-00628-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:William M. Dender |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Edward Drummer
W2000-00414-CCA-R3-PC
The Appellant, Edward Drummer, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief by the Shelby County Criminal Court. In September, 1997, Drummer pled guilty to one count of aggravated rape and was sentenced to fifteen years confinement in the Department of Correction. In 1998, Drummer filed a petition for post-conviction relief challenging the validity of his guilty plea upon grounds of (1) voluntariness and (2) ineffective assistance of counsel. The post-conviction court, finding the claims unsupported, dismissed the petition. On appeal, Drummer contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. After review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge Arthur T. Bennett |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State v. Mark Doolen
M2000-01953-COA-R3-CD
A thirteen-year-old boy was convicted of vandalism in juvenile court, and was ordered to pay restitution of over $6,600. He claimed that the amount of restitution was excessive, and appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed the juvenile court's determination. We affirm the order of restitution, but modify the amount, for the reasons set out below.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Allen W. Wallace |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Glenn Russell Parvin
E2000-01756-CCA-R3-CD
The Sullivan County grand jury issued presentments against the defendant on one count of operating a motor vehicle without a face shield; two counts of speeding; three counts of driving under the influence; three counts of driving on a revoked license; two counts of driving on revoked license after second or subsequent conviction for driving while intoxicated; one count of driving on revoked license after second or subsequent conviction for driving under the influence; one count of driving while intoxicated, fourth offense; and one count of driving under the influence, fourth offense. The charges resulted from three separate cases. The defendant pled to all of the crimes in two different plea hearings and the defendant was sentenced as a career offender to a total of eighteen years, with a minimum jail time of 585 days, and with his last six years to be served on probation. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a career offender and did not apprise the defendant of the possibility that he could be sentenced as a persistent offender, as opposed to a career offender. He moved to withdraw his guilty pleas on this ground. The trial court denied his motion, and he appeals the denial. Furthermore, the defendant waived his right to request probation or alternative sentencing in one case, and the state agreed to allow the defendant to serve probation in one case. In the third case, the defendant requested probation or alternative sentencing. The trial court denied his request, citing his extensive criminal history in support of its denial. The defendant also appeals this denial. After reviewing the record and applicable case law, we find these issues to be without merit and therefore affirm the lower court's denial of defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas and its denial of probation or alternative sentencing.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Originating Judge:Judge R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| State vs. Edward Coffee
M1998-00472-SC-R11-CD
Edward D. Coffee was indicted for possession of certain controlled substances with intent to sell and possession of drug paraphernalia. Because the judicial commissioner failed to make and retain an exact copy of the original search warrant as required by Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(c), the trial court suppressed the evidence recovered in the search and dismissed the indictment. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, and we now also affirm.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:J. O. Bond |
Wilson County | Supreme Court | 08/29/01 | |
| Linda Greene vs. Dr. Woody Stinson
E2001-00628-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:William M. Dender |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| James Ray vs. Billy Williams
W2000-03000-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the doctrine of promissory fraud. The plaintiff service station owner claimed that the defendant rental trailer company fraudulently induced him into entering into a contract to operate a rental trailer dealership by orally assuring him that his dealership rights would be exclusive in Ripley, Tennessee. At the bench trial below, the trial court admitted parol evidence of the oral assurances to show fraud in the inducement of the dealership contract. Based on that evidence, the trial court held that the rental trailer company had committed promissory fraud and awarded damages to the plaintiff service station owner. The rental trailer company now appeals. We affirm the finding of promissory fraud, but reverse in part the damage award.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Lauderdale County | Court of Appeals | 08/29/01 | |
| David Miller vs. State
E1998-00247-SC-R11-PD
We granted petitioner, David Earl Miller's application for permission to appeal to determine whether this Court's decision in State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. 1992) created a new state constitutional rule regarding the elements of deliberation and premeditation. Petitioner claims that Brown created a new state constitutional rule and that the jury instructions given at his initial trial violated this rule by relieving the prosecution of its burden to prove the elements of premeditation and deliberation beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the petitioner argues that his conviction of first-degree murder was not supported by sufficient proof. After due consideration, we conclude that Brown did not announce a new state constitutional rule, did not implicate any constitutional right, is not retroactive, and may not serve as the basis for post-conviction relief. Accordingly, we conclude that the petitioner's complaint about the jury instructions given at his initial trial has been waived because it was not raised on direct appeal and that his complaint about the sufficiency of the evidence to support premeditation and deliberation was previously determined by this Court on direct appeal. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 08/29/01 | |
| Natalya Mazor vs. Kenneth Isaacman
W2000-01485-COA-R3-CV
This is a dental malpractice case. The patient visited the defendant dentist in August 1997 for routine root canal surgery. After the surgery, the patient began experiencing "constant" pain in the tooth in which the root canal was performed. She was told by the defendant dentist that this was pain ordinarily felt after root canal surgery. In February 1999, the patient visited another dentist who discovered that a piece of a drill bit had been left inside patient's tooth during the previous root canal. In December 1999, the patient filed a lawsuit against the defendant dentist for dental malpractice. The defendant dentist filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the patient did not bring the claim within the one year statute of limitations. This motion was granted and the patient now appeals. We reverse, finding that the patient had one year from the time she discovered or should have discovered the foreign object in which to file her lawsuit.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/28/01 | |
| Arthur Anderson vs. Edwin Roberson
W2000-01879-COA-R3-CV
This appeal presents the sole issue of in personam jurisdiction of a nonresident corporation and the nonresident individual owning a majority interest in the corporation by virtue of their activities, as described in the Tennessee Long Arm statute, or alternatively, as co-conspirators with defendants, subject to the jurisdiction of the court.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/28/01 | |
| Judy Burroughs vs. Robert Magee
W2001-00238-COA-R3-CV
This is a personal injury and wrongful death case. The plaintiff and her husband were involved in an automobile accident. The plaintiff sued the driver of the other vehicle for her husband's wrongful death as well as for injuries she sustained in the accident. The plaintiff named the driver's physician as an additional tortfeasor, alleging that the physician negligently prescribed drugs to a known drug addict, negligently prescribed two contraindicated drugs, and negligently failed to warn his patient of the risks of driving while under the influence of the drugs. The trial court granted the physician's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the physician had no duty to unidentifiable third parties such as the plaintiff. We affirm in part and reverse in part, finding that the physician owed a duty to the plaintiff and the decedent to warn his patient of the risks of driving while under the influence of the prescribed drugs.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Appeals | 08/28/01 | |
| In Re: Estate of Lois Chandler
E2000-03055-COA-R3-CV
Buster Chandler, Jr. ("Chandler") was appointed administrator of the estate of his mother, Lois Chandler, who died intestate in 1998. Chandler is incarcerated in Kentucky for a murder he committed in 1990. Chandler requested the Chancery Court arrange for his transportation from prison in Kentucky to Knoxville, Tennessee, so he could be present for the hearing regarding the closing of his mother's estate and so he could meet with the Knox County Attorney General regarding his murder conviction in Kentucky. Chandler argued that the Attorney General wanted to try him for the murder in Knoxville and would assist in obtaining a pardon from the governor of Kentucky. The Chancery Court denied his request, closed his mother's estate, and assessed court costs against Chandler as administrator. Chandler appeals. We affirm the Chancery Court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:John F. Weaver |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 08/28/01 |
APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS
Please enter some keywords to search.