State of Tennessee v. Collin J. Johnson and Jason S. Porterfield
M2001-01973-CCA-R9-CD
The state brings this interlocutory appeal in which it challenges the order of the Rutherford County Circuit Court authorizing the admission into evidence of certain testimony relating to the prior sexual behavior of the alleged rape victim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge James K. Clayton, Jr. |
Rutherford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/15/02 | |
In Re: Adoption of A.B.K.
E2001-02199-COA-R3-CV
Presented with competing petitions for adoption, the trial court terminated the parental rights of W.T.D., Jr. ("the biological father") to his natural daughter, A.B.K. ("the subject child"). The trial court based termination on the failure of the biological father to visit the subject child; it made the order of termination a final judgment pursuant to the provisions of Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02. The biological father appeals, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights. The trial court has reserved a ruling on the competing petitions to adopt pending a resolution of this appeal. Under the unique circumstances of this multiple-petition case, we find that the trial court should resolve all matters, including the issue of adoption, before this case is ripe for appeal. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's Rule 54.02 designation and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Hawkins County | Court of Appeals | 05/15/02 | |
Courtney Brown v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
M2001-01145-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendant appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding the employee 5% permanent partial disability for disfigurement pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-27(3) (E) for scarring resulting from a friction burn sustained when her left hand got caught in a conveyor belt while working for the employer. We hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's findings. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Criminal Court Affirmed. JAMES L. WEATHERFORD, SR. J., in which ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, J., and JOE C. LOSER, SP. J., joined. Mary M. Little, McMinnville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Bridgestone/ Firestone, Inc. B. Keith Williams, Lebanon, Tennessee, for the appellee, Courtney Brown. MEMORANDUM OPINION Ms. Courtney Brown was 23 years old at the time of trial. She has a high school diploma and attended college for 1.5 years majoring in pre-vet. Prior to her job at Bridgestone/Firestone, she worked as a vet technician and as a truck dispatcher at a sporting goods store. She is right-handed. On August 6, 1999, she suffered a third-degree friction burn to the back of her left hand when her hand got caught in a conveyor belt at Bridgestone/Firestone. Ms. Brown was referred to Dr. Bruce Shack, M.D., Chairman of the Department of Plastic Surgery at Vanderbilt. Dr. Shack found that she had suffered a very deep injury involving a full thickness loss of the skin across the entire breadth of the back of her left hand that would require skin grafting. On August 13, 1999, he performed skin graft surgery. On June 29, 2, Dr. Shack found that Ms. Brown had reached maximum medical improvement and released her to return to work with no restrictions. He found that she had regained full range of motion and did not require any further therapy. Although he noted that her "scars were still a little bit red", he felt the scars would "go on to probably mature satisfactorily." He did state that skin grafts require more lubrication and protection than normal skin. Dr. Shack found that she did not have any limitations on the use of her hand. Dr. Shack assigned a 2% impairment to the hand based on Page 28 Table 2 Class 1 for skin disorders contained in the AMA Guides Fourth Edition. He admitted that this section of the Guides is more subjective and vague than other sections, but felt she did deserve some impairment based on the scar. On October 16, 2, Dr. David Gaw, M.D., orthopedist, performed an independent medical examination. Dr. Gaw found that Ms. Brown had a scar 6 centimeters in length and 3 centimeters in width along the top of her left hand. He also reported she had a 1.5 centimeter scar along her left index finger. Ms. Brown expressed concern about the appearance of the scar, which Dr. Gaw described as red, thickened and tender to touch. Dr. Gaw found that her index finger would not close completely to the palm in making a fist but would only go to within 3/8 of an inch of the palm of her hand. Dr. Gaw assigned 2% impairment based on slight motion loss of the index finger and 5% impairment to the left hand for disfigurement, scars and skin graft using the same section of the Guides on skin disorders as Dr. Shack had used for his impairment rating. He did not assign specific restrictions but indicated that pain would be the limiting factor on her activities. Ms. Brown testified that the scar does affect her grip strength, there is not a lot of feeling in the skin graft area, and that the range of motion in her finger bothers her sometimes. She also stated it can be very painful if she gets hit in that area. The scar appears worse in the winter and breaks out in a bad rash. Ms. Brown continues to work for Bridgestone/Firestone earning the same wage she earned at the time of the accident. When asked how this scar affected her ability to get a job or keep a job, Ms. Brown responded as follows: I'm very ashamed of it. I keep it covered up. Most of the time I'm wearing long sleeves. I try to cover them up. I don't feel I'm as outgoing as I used to be. Especially talking with my hands or doing anything with my hands. I keep them, keep it covered most of the time. -2-
Authoring Judge: James L. Weatherford, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:J.O. Bond, Judge |
Wilson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/15/02 | |
Vivian Warner, Admin. Est. of Maude Frazier vs. Dewey Frazier
E2001-02126-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Steven C. Douglas |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 05/15/02 | |
David Ralph Liles, et al. v. Rebecca Sue Mitchell, et al.
M2001-02037-COA-R3-CV
Mark Steven Blair appeals the action of the trial judge in granting custody of his minor child, born out of wedlock, to the maternal grandparents. Finding that a substantial risk of harm might occur to the minor child if custody was placed with Mr. Blair and that the biological mother of the child was incarcerated, the trial court vested custody of the child in the maternal grandparents with substantial visitation rights given to Mr. Blair, the biological father. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
State v. William R. Stevens
M1999-02067-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 05/14/02 | |
James Williams v. Salvadore Valdez v. TAPCO Underwriters
M2001-00666-COA-R3-CV
In an action brought by an insured against his insurer for indemnity, the trial court entered judgment after the defendant insurer moved for involuntary dismissal under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.02. We vacate the judgment and remand. In an action brought by an insured against his insurer for indemnity, the trial court entered judgment after the defendant insurer moved for involuntary dismissal under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.02. We vacate the judgment and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Hilton Jeffries v. TDOC
M2001-02300-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a prison disciplinary proceeding. A prisoner at the Southeast Regional Correctional Facility was charged with four serious disciplinary infractions. He pleaded guilty to three charges, and a prison disciplinary board found him guilty of the fourth. The board placed the prisoner in punitive segregation for five days and ordered him to pay $810 in restitution from his inmate trust fund account. The prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County alleging (1) that his guilty pleas had been coerced and (2) that he had been denied due process on the fourth charge by the board's failure to provide him twenty-four hours notice of the hearing and its interference with his opportunity to present exculpatory evidence. The trial court granted the Tennessee Department of Correction's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the prisoner's petition. We have determined that the trial court erred by granting the summary judgment with regard to the $810 restitution order because the record contains material factual disputes regarding whether the prisoner waived his right to twenty-four hours notice of the hearing and whether the board refused to permit him to call an exculpatory witness.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Larry Brown
W2000-03118-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Larry Brown, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of theft of property with a value over $500.00 and evading arrest. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced him to six years for the theft charge and eleven months and twenty-nine days for evading arrest. The trial court ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm the Defendant's conviction for evading arrest and reverse and dismiss his conviction for theft of property.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Joseph B. Dailey |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Christina Fortenberry vs. G.T.George
E2000-02984-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
State v. William R. Stevens
M1999-02067-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 05/14/02 | |
Christine Bilyeu vs. Bobby Bilyeu
E2001-01556-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court ordered the parties divorced and classified and divided marital property. Both parties appeal. We affirm, as modified.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Steven C. Douglas |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Michael Couillard vs. Martha Couillard
E2001-01770-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Carter County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Kathy Jean Berry v. Sara Lee Corporation d/b/a Jimmy
W2001-00041-WC-R3-CV
In this appeal, Defendants/Appellants asks: (1) Did the trial court err in finding that Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to her shoulder?; (2) Did the trial court err in finding that Plaintiff sustained a second and distinct compensable injury to her right elbow?; and (3) Did the evidence presented at trial preponderate against the amount of the permanent partial disability benefits awarded by the trial court, with respect to the shoulder injury and the second right elbow injury? As discussed below, the trial court did not err and this panel has concluded that the judgment should be affirmed.
Authoring Judge: L. Terry Lafferty, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford, Chancellor |
Dyer County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/14/02 | |
Christina Fortenberry vs. G.T.George
E2000-02984-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Dan Evans v. Phillip Matlock
M2001-02631-COA-R9-CV
An antique Dr. Pepper Dispenser was offered for sale on e-Bay's auction site on the internet. After the plaintiff's bid was allegedly accepted, the seller sold the dispenser to another party. This litigation ensued between the users of the e-Bay service, alleging breach of contract, fraud, conspiracy, inducement of breach of contract, and other counts. The seller moved for summary judgment on the ground that the User Agreement provided that disputes must be arbitrated. The trial court held that the arbitration clause was inapplicable to disputes between users. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Robert L. Jones |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Jan W. Gamble v. Alex Grady Gamble, Iii
2001-01392-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge:L. Marie Williams |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Barry Bernstein v. Debra Bernstein
M2001-01631-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the dissolution of a nineteen-year marriage. After the husband filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Davidson County seeking a divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable differences and inappropriate marital conduct, the wife counterclaimed for divorce on the same grounds. Following a bench trial, the trial court declared the parties divorced, divided their meager marital estate, and ordered the husband to pay the wife $350 per month as long-term spousal support. The husband asserts on this appeal that he is unable to pay the amount of long-term spousal support ordered by the trial court. We disagree and have determined that the record supports the trial court's decision regarding spousal support.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Emily Lewis vs. Life Care Centers of America
E2001-01812-COA-R3-CV
Emily Lewis, a student enrolled in a Certified Nursing Assistant's training program operated and supervised by Nursetrainers, Inc., sues Life Care Centers of America, Inc. The suit seeks damages for injuries resulting to Ms. Lewis, who was taking training to become a Certified Nursing Assistant. As a result of Life Care's negligence, the original complaint alleged several other causes of action, all of which have been abandoned on appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:L. Marie Williams |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Michael Couillard vs. Martha Couillard
E2001-01770-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Carter County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Carol Soloman v. Klebber Murrey
M2001-00806-COA-R3-CV
Before their marriage, the parties signed a pre-nuptial agreement, which among other things, declared their intention to "equally divide any and all living expenses." When they divorced, the trial court enforced the agreement, and ordered the husband to reimburse the wife for her far greater contribution to such expenses during the course of the marriage. The husband argues on appeal that the living expenses provision should not have been enforced, because it is contrary to public policy. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Roy Gray vs. Nancy Gray
E2001-02470-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce case from the Circuit Court for Knox County the Appellant, Roy William Gray, contends that the Trial Court erred in failing to disqualify counsel for the Appellee, Nancy Jane Gray. Mr. Gray further contends that the Court erred in dividing the marital assets, in granting both parties a divorce, and in awarding Ms. Gray post trial attorney's fees. Ms. Gray asserts that she should be reimbursed for attorney's fees incurred by her in responding to this appeal upon the grounds that the appeal is frivolous and devoid of merit. The judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Bill Swann |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Extendicare International v. James Anderson, III
M2001-02265-COA-R3-CV
Appellants filed a legal malpractice action against James P. Anderson, III on July 20, 1999. Appellants filed an Amended Complaint against Anderson III on February 14, 2001 and, in such Amended Complaint, asserted for the first time a claim against James B. Anderson, II and his law firm, Anderson & Bridges. The trial court granted summary judgment to Anderson II and Anderson & Bridges upon a finding, as a matter of law, that the statute of limitations as to them had expired. We affirm the action of the trial judge.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Roger Edward Edwards
E2001-00705-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant appeals the trial court's denial of defendant's request to withdraw his guilty plea and motion for a new trial. On appeal, defendant has two assertions: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel and (2) the State committed a Brady violation. Concluding that defendant received effective assistance of counsel and did not demonstrate a Brady violation, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge E. Shayne Sexton |
Claiborne County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/14/02 | |
Michael Watkins v. Greg Fitzgerald
M2000-03197-COA-R3-CV
This case originated in the General Sessions Court of Davidson County wherein Greg Fitzgerald filed an unlawful detainer warrant against Michael Watkins relative to real property at 1127 Delmas Avenue in Nashville. Then, Michael Watkins filed an action against Fitzgerald for wrongfully evicting him from the same property. Mr. Watkins then filed a civil warrant against Constance Regina Wilson and Curtis Sharp, Jr. for breach of contract asserting an agreement between the parties relative to the same real estate. Judgments of the general sessions court were appealed to the circuit court, consolidated and heard in circuit to the end that circuit court judgments were rendered in favor of Fitzgerald, Wilson and Sharp, and against Michael Watkins. From these judgments Watkins appeals and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/02 |