Please enter some keywords to search.
| Greg Melton v. Gerald Melton
M2002-00532-COA-R3-CV
Beneficiaries of irrevocable insurance Trust filed a Complaint against the Trustees, seeking to have the corpus of the trust distributed and the Trust terminated by its own terms. One Trustee, acting pro se, answered the Complaint. Beneficiaries filed a Motion for Summary Judgment supported by their joint affidavits. No response or countervailing affidavit was filed, and an Order was entered granting the Motion. Trustee appeals. We affirm
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:J. B. Cox |
Bedford County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| John Garland vs. Tonia Garland
E2002-00949-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce action, the wife appeals the alimony award and amount of attorney's fees awarded to her. On appeal, we Affirm as Modified.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:James W. Mckenzie |
Rhea County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Sherrie Mae Crawford
E2002-01292-CCA-R3-CD
Pursuant to a plea agreement, the Defendant pled guilty to theft under $500 and to violating an habitual traffic offender order. She entered Alford pleas to possession of marijuana with intent to sell, possession of drug paraphernalia, and two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Her total effective sentence was two years as a Range I standard offender plus eleven months and twenty-nine days on supervised probation. The manner of service of the two-year sentence was to be determined by the trial court following a sentencing hearing. The trial court denied alternative sentencing and ordered the Defendant to serve the entire two years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to impose an alternative sentence. Concluding that the record supports the trial court's denial of alternative sentencing, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Herman Howard. v. American Industries Services
M2001-02711-COA-R3-CV
The Chancery Court of Davidson County dismissed the complaint in this case for the plaintiffs' failure to respond to discovery requests. The plaintiffs assert on appeal that the chancellor abused her discretion. We affirm the chancery court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State v. Patty Grissom
M2002-00279-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Patty Francine Grissom, was convicted of the simple possession of a Schedule II controlled substance and she received a probationary sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days. Subsequently, the trial court revoked the appellant's probation upon finding that she had possessed drugs and drug paraphernalia while on probation. On appeal, the appellant raises several issues concerning her probation revocation. Upon reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Pigeon Forge vs. William Loveday
E2002-00643-COA-R3-CV
Landowner seeks a new trial in eminent domain case on grounds that the Trial Court admitted in evidence the price paid for the land 19 years earlier. We reverse the Trial Court's Judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State v. Phillip Wilcox
M2002-00667-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant contends the trial court erred in revoking his probation. He claims the trial court improperly considered evidence of probation violations, because he was not given proper notice of the violations by the probation revocation warrant. He further claims that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was insufficient to revoke his probation. The trial court heard evidence of probation violations that were not included in the probation warrant, but the trial court specifically stated it did not consider such evidence in revoking the defendant's probation. Because sufficient evidence exists to prove the defendant violated Rule One of his Rules of Probation, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Rose Warnick vs. Carter County
E2002-00833-COA-R3-CV
This is a negligence action filed by Rose F. Warnick against Carter County ("the County") seeking damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident involving the plaintiff and Keith G. Range ("Deputy Range"), a Carter County deputy sheriff, who, according to the complaint, was "acting within the course and scope of his authority as an agent, servant and employee of" the County at the time of the accident. The County filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(6). The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint, holding that it was not filed within one year of the accident as required by the Governmental Tort Liability Act ("the GTLA"). We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jean A. Stanley |
Carter County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| E2002-01703-COA-R3-CV
E2002-01703-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Telford E. Forgerty, Jr. |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Teresa Malone vs. Shane Maddox
E2002-01403-COA-R3-CV
This case focuses on an insurance company's liability under the uninsured motorist ("UM") provisions of an automobile insurance policy. It arises out of an automobile accident involving Teresa Malone ("the policyholder") and Shane Maddox ("the uninsured motorist"). The policyholder appeals the trial court's judgment decreeing that the policyholder's uninsured motorist carrier, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company ("the UM carrier"), cannot be held liable for prejudgment interest under the facts of this case because such an award would cause the total judgment against the UM carrier to exceed the UM coverage limit in the policy. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:W. Neil Thomas, III |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Mark Anthony Griffin
E2001-01233-CCA-R3-CD
A jury convicted the Defendant of aggravated robbery and attempted robbery. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to an effective nine-year term. The Defendant appealed, and our Court affirmed the case in part, but remanded the case in part for the trial court to determine whether the Defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated. On remand, the trial court found that the Defendant's right to a speedy trial had not been violated. The Defendant now appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to dismiss for a violation of his right to a speedy trial. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Carlos E. Bryan
M2001-02705-CCA-R3-CD
This is yet another case in which the parties have been ensnared in the procedural pitfalls of a certified question of law. Defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to possession of over seventy pounds of marijuana with intent to sell or deliver with an agreed sentence of eight years. He attempted to reserve a certified question of law pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37(b)(2)(iv), "with the consent of the court," relating to the search and seizure of the contraband. Because the defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty and neither the judgment nor the order of the court reflects the state's consent to the certified question, we must dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Donna Hardey v. Pml, Inc., Ebi Companies and James
W2001-02569-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-285 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings and fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal the plaintiff, Donna Hardey (Hardey) contends the evidence preponderates in favor of an award in excess of the twenty-five percent (25%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole awarded by the trial court. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (21 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed W. MICHAEL MALOAN, SP. J., in which JANICE M. HOLDER, J. and JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., joined. Ricky L. Boren, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Donna Hardey. Jeffrey G. Foster, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, PML, Inc. and EBI Companies. E. Blaine Sprouse, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Labor, Workers' Compensation Division MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Hardey, was forty (4) years old at trial. She completed the eleventh (11th) grade and obtained a general equivalency diploma. Her work history is mostly manual labor in factories. She began working for PML in November 1994 as a welding machine operator until she was promoted to a group leader. As group leader she was responsible for assigning operators to presses and overseeing their operation. In July 1997 Hardey hurt her neck at PML. Dr. Glenn Barnett diagnosed a herniated C6 disc on the left and on January 26,1998 he performed an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of the C6-7 discs. She filed a workers' compensation claim which was ultimately settled on January 8, 1999, for twenty percent (2%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Hardey returned to work at PML as a group leader without restrictions. Hardey began to have problems with her right shoulder and arm and returned to see Dr. Barnett on June 25, 1999. Dr. Barnett determined that she had a C5 herniated disc. On October 14, 1999, Dr. Barnett performed as a second operation a discectomy and fusion at the C5-C6 level. As a result of this second surgery, Dr. Barnett assigned an additional five percent (5%) permanent impairment and advised Hardey not to lift in excess of thirty (3) pounds on a regular basis. In June 1999, Hardey complained to Dr. Barnett of right arm and finger numbness. A nerve conduction study showed mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome of the right arm. Dr. Barnett did not recommend surgery for this condition. When Dr. Barnett saw Hardey on February 7, 22, he noted she was doing "miserably, was quite uncomfortable, and taking up to fourteen Tylenol per day." Dr. Barnett testified it was not likely she would be able to return to work "unless she gets a dramatic improvement with her nonsurgical treatment of her pain." Due to her chronic pain, Dr. Barnett referred Hardey to Dr. Frank Jordan, a pain specialist. Dr. Jordan saw her on August 22, 21, diagnosed radicular pain, prescribed medication and performed two (2) epidural blocks. Hardey testified she did not get any relief from Dr. Jordan's treatment. Dr. Joseph Boals examined Hardey for an independent medical evaluation on October 3, 2. On examination, Dr. Boals found extensive loss of motion in her neck, hypesthesia in the last three (3) fingers of her right hand, and a positive Phalen's test on the right arm. He assigned a ten percent (1%) permanent impairment for each cervical surgery and an additional ten percent (1%) for chronic pain syndrome. Dr. Boals assigned an additional ten percent (1%) permanent impairment for the carpal tunnel syndrome. As a result of both injuries and surgeries to her neck and her carpal tunnel syndrome, Dr. Boals recommended she not go back to manual labor employment. Her restrictions include no overhead work, no work away from her body, and a weight limit of less than twenty (2) pounds with no repetitive work using her hands or heavy gripping using her hands, and she is suited to only sedentary or light work status. -2-
Authoring Judge: W. Michael William Michael Maloan, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn, Judge |
Benton County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/11/02 | |
| State of Tennessee v. James Charles Cavaye
M2001-02154-CCA-R3-CD
Following a jury trial, Defendant, James Charles Cavaye, was convicted of first degree felony murder and especially aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder, and to a consecutive sentence of twenty-four years for the especially aggravated robbery. In this appeal as of right, Defendant contends that (1) the trial court failed to fulfill its role as the thirteenth juror; (2) the accomplice's testimony was insufficiently corroborated; (3) the trial court erred in applying enhancement factors in setting Defendant's sentence for especially aggravated robbery; and (4) the trial court erred in ordering Defendant's sentences to run consecutively. Based upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Judge Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| City of Oak Hill v. AAMP
M2001-00688-COA-R3-CV
This appeal concerns the City of Oak Hill's efforts to enforce its exclusively residential zoning restrictions over a parcel of land situated at the city's eastern border. The city appeals the trial court's finding that "parcel 109" was located outside of Oak Hill's city boundary and, therefore, not subject to the city's zoning ordinances. We affirm the action of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| James Staggs v. Lori Staggs
M2001-01192-COA-R3-CV
The trial court transferred custody of the parties' two children from the mother to the father. The mother argues on appeal that there was no change of circumstances to support a change of custody, and no proof that the change would be in the best interest of the children. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Leonard W. Martin |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Peter Zabaski v. Mary Ann Zabaski
M2001-02013-COA-R3-CV
The trial court granted a divorce to the parents of an only child with a history of severe medical problems, and awarded them joint custody. The wife contends on appeal that the trial court's order of custody and visitation was not in the child's best interest. She also argues that the court erred by setting the husband's child support obligation too low, and by failing to award her alimony in futuro. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| F. T. Greer v. Joseph Marci
M2001-02536-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from the denial of the Chancery Court of Sumner County of Plaintiffs' request for an injunction. The dispute involves the construction of a brick entranceway which connects a county road to Defendants' driveway easement over the Plaintiffs' property. The entranceway lies within the "metes and bounds" of a county road. The Chancellor refused to grant an injunction ordering removal of the entranceway holding that the county was the only party with standing to seek removal of obstructions within the right-of-way of a county road. We disagree with the Chancellor and find that the Plaintiffs own fee simple title to the pertinent portion of the right-of-way and therefore have standing to assert their ownership rights independent of the county. We therefore reverse the finding of the Chancellor and remand the case for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas W. Graham
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Brenda Barton v. Anvil International, Inc.,
W2001-02523-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer insists (1) the trial court erred in considering an examining physician's opinion as not being based on statutory guidelines and (2) the award of permanent partial disability benefits based on 5 percent to one arm and 45 percent to the other arm is excessive.1 As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (21 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., in which JANICE M. HOLDER, J., and MICHAEL MALOAN, SP. J., joined. Jeffery G. Foster, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Anvil International, Inc. Scott G. Kirk, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, Brenda Barton MEMORANDUM OPINION The employee or claimant, Ms. Barton, initiated this civil action to recover workers' compensation disability benefits for a work-related injury. The employer, Anvil International, denied liability for permanent disability. After a trial on the merits, the trial court awarded, among other things, benefits based on permanent partial disability to both arms. The employer has appealed. 1 An injury to both arms is a scheduled injury and the better practice is to average the awards to each arm for a single award base d on a per centage of b oth arm s. Scales v. City of Oak Ridge, 53 S.W .3d 649 at n. 1 (Tenn. 2 1). Th e issue d eem ed w aived since it wa s not raised in this a ppe al. For injuries occurring on or after July 1, 1985, appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2) (21 Supp.). The reviewing court is required to conduct an independent examination of the record to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris, Chancellor |
Chester County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/11/02 | |
| James Pemerton & Deborah Pemerton v. Beauty Wall Painting
M2001-01638-COA-R3-CV
This is a breach of warranty case. The plaintiff homeowners contracted with the defendant painter to have their home painted. The contract included a one-year warranty on labor and materials. After the work was completed, the paint began to peel, blister, and separate from the wood siding. The homeowners sued the painter under the warranty. The trial court found that the homeowners complained of the problems within the one-year warranty period. The trial court awarded the homeowners damages for the amount paid to the painter, substantial damages for repairs, and discretionary costs. On appeal, the painter argued that the trial judge failed to properly understand the testimony of the parties regarding the painter's actions after being informed of the paint problems, and therefore, improperly discredited the painter's testimony with regard to the issue of the date the homeowners told the painter about the defective work. We affirm, finding that the defendant painter failed to show any basis for reversing the credibility determination of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Paul E. Johnson v. The Metropolitan Government Of
M2001-00633-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Don R. Ash
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Darren A. Dewalt
W2001-02778-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Darren A. Dewalt, appeals as of right from the trial court's order revoking his probation and reinstating his original sentence to be served in the Shelby County Correction Center. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by revoking his probation based upon an unidentified and unsubstantiated laboratory report indicating that Defendant had used drugs in violation of his probation. Based upon a review of the entire record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Judge James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/09/02 | |
| Hershel Willard Hill v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.,
M2001-02820-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) (22 Supp.) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court ruled as a matter of law that the employee's request for reconsideration under Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-241(a)(2) (21 Supp.) was barred because (1) his initial award was below the two and one-half times multiplier cap and (2) his employment was not terminated. The employee contends that the trial court erred on both grounds. As discussed below, the panel has concluded that _ 5-6-241(a)(2) requires neither a capping at two and one-half times the initial award nor a termination. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (21 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Vacated and Remanded JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., in which JANICE M. HOLDER, J., and JAMES L. WEATHERFORD, SR. J., joined Russell D. Hedges, Moore & Hedges, Tullahoma, Tennessee, for the appellant, Hershel Willard Hill Edward A. Hadley, Gideon & Wiseman, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Wilson Sporting Goods Company and Kemper Insurance Company MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-241(a)(2), the employee or claimant, Hershel Hill, initiated this civil action for reconsideration of a previous award of permanent partial disability benefits for injuries suffered in a work-related accident on April 23, 1997. After a hearing, the trial court disallowed reconsideration because (1) the previous award was less than two and one-half times the highest impairment rating and (2) the claimant had not been discharged by the employer. The claimant has appealed. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2) (21 Supp.). Conclusions of law are subject to de novo review on appeal without any presumption of correctness. Nutt v. Champion Intern. Corp., 98 S.W.2d 365, 367 (Tenn. 1998). Issues of statutory construction are solely questions of law. Bryant v. Genco Stamping & Mfg. Co., 33 S.W.3d 761, 765 (Tenn. 2). Workers' compensation laws must be construed so as to ensure that injured employees are justly and appropriately reimbursed for debilitating injuries suffered in the course of service to the employer. Story v. Legion Ins. Co., 3 S.W.3d 45, 454 (Tenn. 1999). Mr. Hill worked for the employer, Wilson Sporting Goods, for more than thirty years until his retirement in 1999. On April 23, 1997, he had a collision with an electric cart at work. The resulting back injury was initially treated by Dr. Richard A. Bagby and Dr. Robert M. Dimick. Both physicians assigned a zero permanent impairment rating for the claimant's injury. A third physician, Dr. Richard Fishbein, evaluated the claimant and assigned a permanent impairment rating of five percent to the whole person. On May 5, 1997, the claimant returned to his job at Wilson at a wage equal to or greater than his wage before the injury. Accordingly, by Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-241(a), his potential permanent disability award was limited to two and one-half times his medical impairment rating. On October 23, 1998, the trial court awarded benefits based on 7.5 percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, or one and one-half times the impairment rating assigned by Dr. Fishbein. In the year that followed, the claimant continued to work at Wilson while suffering from back pain. His last day at work was October 26, 1999, after which he took sick leave. On October 27, 1999, he visited Dr. Paul McCombs, who informed Mr. Hill that surgery was not an option for his back condition. With the assistance of Dr. McCombs, the claimant obtained social security disability benefits. He also retired from Wilson under its disability plan. At the trial of this cause, the claimant testified that the pain in his back worsened in the time following the first hearing, but the nature of the pain did not change. The trial court declined the invitation to reconsider Mr. Hill's claim based on two independent and unrelated grounds. First, the court held that reconsideration was appropriate only where the initial award was capped by the two and one-half multiplier limit. Second, the court held that an employee must be terminated in order to be eligible for reconsideration of the initial award. Thus, the trial court concluded, because the initial award was less than two and one-half times Dr. Fishbein's rating and the claimant had not been terminated, Mr. Hill's application for reconsideration was rejected as a matter of law. According to Tennessee Code Annotated section 5-6-241(a)(1), [f]or injuries arising on or after August 1, 1992, in cases where an injured employee is eligible to receive any permanent partial disability benefits, pursuant to _ 5-6-27(3)(A)(i) and (F), and the -2-
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Originating Judge:Jeffrey F. Stewart, Chancellor |
Wilson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/09/02 | |
| Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube v. Michael Norman Dube
E2002-00413-COA-R3-CV
Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube ("Wife") sued Michael Norman Dube ("Husband") for a divorce. Wife is primarily a stay-at-home mother and Husband is an emergency room physician. The Trial Court divided the marital property with 65% of the property going to Wife. The Trial Court awarded Wife permanent alimony of $3,200 per month after finding Wife could not be sufficiently rehabilitated. Child support was set based on Husband's income for 2000, during which time he claims to have worked approximately 90 hours per week. Husband appeals the division of marital property, award of permanent alimony, and amount of child support which was based on his 90 hour work week. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 12/09/02 | |
| Harold J. Garth v. Siskin Steel & Supply Company,
E2002-00090-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann._ 5-6-225 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found the plaintiff suffered 75 percent disability to his right hand as a result of an on-the-job injury, which occurred on March 1, 2. The defendant says the trial judge erred in not finding the plaintiff's recovery for the injury should be limited to the thumb or the first phalange of the thumb. The plaintiff says the trial court properly found the plaintiff suffered an impairment to his right hand but says the trial court should have granted a higher award. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed JOHN K. BYERS, SR. J., in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, J. and JOSEPH M. TIPTON, SP. J., joined. Kent T. Jones, Chattanooga, Tennessee, attorney for appellant, Randstand Staffing Services. David D. Moore, Chattanooga, Tennessee, attorney for appellant, Siskin Steel & Supply Company. Richard H. Winningham, Chattanooga, Tennessee, attorney for appellee, Harold J. Garth. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Harold Garth, is a high school graduate with vocational training as a bricklayer. After serving in the military, he attended Draughon's Junior college where he received a degree or diploma in trucking and has past experience in both trucking and construction. The undisputed evidence shows the plaintiff sustained an injury to his right thumb or hand on March 1, 2 while working as a materials handler with Siskin Steel & Supply Company through Randstad Staffing Services.1 Medical Evidence Dr. Daniel Labrador, Jr., a plastic surgeon, saw the plaintiff at the emergency room on March 1, 2, shortly after he was injured. He testified that the tip of the plaintiff's right thumb had been torn off. The portion of the thumb was reattached to the plaintiff's thumb and treatment began. Dr. Labrador saw the plaintiff on several occasions and last saw him on April 3, 2. Dr. Labrador denied that the plaintiff's hand injury had developed gangrene. Dr. Labrador concluded that the plaintiff's injury had healed on April 2, 2, and testified the plaintiff sustained a 1 percent permanent medical impairment to his right thumb. Dr. Labrador testified he was somewhat limited in his finding because Mr. Garth did not return for a final appointment after April 3, 2.2 Dr. Robert Mastey, a hand and upper extremities specialist, saw the plaintiff on July 27, 21 at the request of the defendant for purposes of evaluation. He found the plaintiff had no bone loss and had normal nerve function in the hand, which was based upon a review of an EMG and CV done previously. He also found the plaintiff had loss of motion in the thumb and loss of digital height. Dr Mastey determined the plaintiff had sustained a 14 percent medical impairment to the right thumb. Dr. Mastey did not consider a loss of grip finding because he felt it was unreliable.3 Dr. Cauley W. Hayes, a hand surgeon, saw the plaintiff on April 6, 2. He testified that the tip of the plaintiff's thumb had been amputated (soft tissue), that the soft tissue had been reattached and that the wound had become necrotic and gangrenous. Dr. Hayes found the plaintiff's right thumb was numb almost past the metacarpal phalange joint and that the plaintiff was experiencing swelling of the hand. Dr. Hayes opined the plaintiff would have a permanent partial medical impairment of 33 percent to his hand, with loss of motion and "fine manipulation." Lay Testimony The plaintiff and other witnesses testified at trial that his right hand continues to swell. On two occasions the plaintiff exhibited his hand to the trial judge for observation, once at the request of counsel and once at the request of the trial judge. The only response by the judge on these 1 Randstad Staffing and Siskin Steel stipulated at trial that Randstad was the actual statutory employer of the plaintiff at the time of the alleged injury and, by agreement, Randstad Staffing Services took on sole responsibility for the jud gme nt. 2 The plaintiff testified he did not return to Dr. Labrador because his finger was swollen and infected and he did not think he was being properly treated. 3 Dr. Mastey appeared antagonistic to questions from plaintiff's counsel and also interjected his legal opinion into his testim ony b y citing a co mpe nsation decisio n by the Sup reme Court. -2-
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:W. Frank Brown, III, Chancellor |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/09/02 |