State of Tennessee v. Weylin Trent Strode
M2019-00764-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Weylin Trent Strode, appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, asserting that his plea should not be allowed to stand due to uncertainties regarding his mental competency at the time of the plea. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the motion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Gary McKenzie |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/11/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jennifer Murray Jewell
M2019-02160-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Jennifer Murray Jewell, appeals the trial court’s order revoking her ten-year probationary sentence for theft of property valued at more than $60,000 but less than $100,000 after determining that she violated the conditions of her probation by committing a new theft. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it found that the evidence was sufficient to support her probation revocation and when it ordered her to serve her original sentence in confinement without making “explicit findings about the efficacy of a probationary term with modified conditions.” After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Joseph A. Woodruff |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/11/21 | |
Phillip Burgess v. State of Tennessee
M2020-00028-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Phillip Matthew Burgess, appeals as of right from the Marshall County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge M. Wyatt Burk |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/11/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. John Christopher Schubert
E2019-01257-CCA-R3-CD
A jury convicted the Defendant, John Christopher Schubert, of aggravated robbery, robbery, theft, tampering with evidence, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct. The Defendant received an effective eighteen-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the State presented insufficient proof regarding his identity, that his convictions for resisting arrest and disorderly conduct violate the prohibition against double jeopardy, that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay evidence, and that the trial court erroneously gave an instruction on flight. After a thorough review of the record, we discern no error and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Steven W. Sword |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/09/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Morris L. Long, II
M2019-01085-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant-Appellant, Morris Long, was convicted by a Dickson County jury of first-degree premeditated murder, Tenn. Code Ann.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Larry J. Wallace |
Dickson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/08/21 | |
Zachary J. Pence v. State of Tennessee
E2019-01942-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Zachary Pence, was convicted of aggravated rape of a child, aggravated child abuse, and child abuse. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-531, -15-401, -15-402. He was subsequently sentenced to sixty years. Following denial of his direct appeal, the Petitioner filed a petition seeking post-conviction relief, alleging that trial counsel was ineffective based on the following grounds: (1) failing to prepare for trial and to prepare the Petitioner to testify at trial; (2) failing to investigate; and (3) failing to provide the Petitioner with audio recordings until the day prior to trial. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Donald Ray Elledge |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/08/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Regina Jackson
M2019-01390-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Regina Jackson, appeals her Cheatham County Circuit Court jury conviction of second offense driving under the influence (“DUI”), arguing that the trial court erred by denying her motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause and by denying her a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Suzanne Lockert-Mash |
Cheatham County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/05/21 | |
Terrell B. Johnson v. State of Tennessee
E2020-00488-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Terrell B. Johnson, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition arguing the post-conviction court erred in finding he received the effective assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal. Following our review, we affirm the post-conviction court’s denial of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Originating Judge:Judge G. Scott Green |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/04/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Kenzie Anderson
M2020-00120-CCA-R3-CD
A Davidson County jury found Defendant, Kenzi Eugene Anderson, guilty on two counts each of aggravated burglary, employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and aggravated robbery, for which the trial court sentenced Defendant to an effective sentence of twenty-three years’ incarceration. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Defendant’s motion to sever defendants and by imposing an excessive sentence and that the trial court committed plain error by failing to sever his offenses for trial. Following a thorough review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Cheryl A. Blackburn |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/03/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Gary Wayne Bunch
E2019-00300-CCA-R3-CD
The Appellant, Gary Wayne Bunch, pled guilty to two counts of theft under $1,000. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent sentences of ten years for each offense, and he was placed on supervised probation. Upon finding that the Appellant violated the conditions of his probation, the trial court revoked the Appellant’s probation and ordered him to serve his sentence in confinement. On appeal, the Appellant challenges the ruling of the trial court. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge E. Shayne Sexton |
Campbell County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/03/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Gary Wayne Bunch - Concurring Opinion
E2019-00300-CCA-R3-CD
I concur fully with the conclusion reached by the majority that there was evidence to support the trial court’s decision to revoke Defendant’s probation and to order Defendant to serve the balance of his original sentence in incarceration. I write separately to affirm my belief expressed in my concurring opinion in State v. Craig Dagnan, No. M2020- 00152-CCA-R3-CD, 2021WL 289010, at *3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 28, 2021), perm. app. filed, that once a determination is made that a defendant has violated the conditions of his or her probation, neither an additional hearing nor any additional findings are statutorily mandated of a trial court to determine the manner in which the original sentence should be served. Thus, there is no opportunity for an abuse of discretion when a “second exercise of discretion” is not required by either sections 40-35-310 or 40-35-311 of Tennessee Code Annotated.
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge E. Shayne Sexton |
Campbell County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/03/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Alfred Lee Boykin, III
E2019-02070-CCA-R3-CD
Pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37, the defendant, Alfred Lee Boykin, III, appeals two certified questions of law related to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his case due to excessive delay in prosecuting the case. Because the defendant failed to establish prejudice flowing from the more than two-year delay in this case, the trial court did not err by denying his motion to dismiss. The judgments of the trial court are, therefore, affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Alex Pearson |
Hamblen County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/02/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Trenton Jermaine Bell
M2019-01810-CCA-R3-CD
Trenton Jermaine Bell, Defendant, was arrested and charged with first degree premediated murder, tampering with evidence, and abuse of a corpse in connection with the death of the victim, Sydney Green. A Wilson County jury convicted Defendant as charged on all counts, and the trial court sentenced Defendant to an effective life sentence. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error by failing to issue a curative instruction when a police detective offered improper lay testimony. He also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for first degree premeditated murder and that he was denied a jury venire comprising a fair cross section of the community. After a thorough review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Brody N. Kane |
Wilson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/02/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Eli Kea
E2019-00890-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Eli Kea, was convicted by a jury of four counts of attempted aggravated robbery, four counts of aggravated assault, one count of reckless aggravated assault, and two counts of reckless endangerment of another by discharging a firearm into an occupied habitation. Thereafter, the trial court merged several of the convictions and imposed an effective ten-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, arguing that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop of his vehicle based solely on a general description of the vehicle; (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator of the episode involving four counts of attempted aggravated robbery and four counts of aggravated assault; and (3) the trial court erred by allowing the State to impeach a co-defendant with a prior statement because the jury was unlikely to consider the prior statement only for credibility purposes given the prejudicial nature of the statement. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge G. Scott Green |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/02/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Nathaniel Shawn Declue
M2019-01424-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Nathaniel Shawn Declue, pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, two counts of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, driving on revoked license, violation of the vehicle registration law, simple possession of a Schedule VI substance, and possession of drug paraphernalia. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court merged multiple convictions and imposed an effective sentence of twenty years in confinement. The Defendant appeals, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to apply a mitigating factor and by failing to consider the economic resources available to state prisons in its decision to impose a twenty-year effective sentence. After review of the record, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Forest A. Durard, Jr. |
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/02/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Kelly Lee Pitts
E2019-01656-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Kelly Lee Pitts, was convicted by a jury of seven counts each of attempted first degree murder and possessing a firearm during the commission of or attempt to commit a dangerous felony. Thereafter, the trial court imposed an effective fifty-one-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions for attempted first degree murder, specifically, challenging the element of premeditation; (2) the trial court erred by imposing partial consecutive sentencing based upon the dangerous offender criterion; (3) and the trial court erred in imposing Class C felony convictions for employing a firearm during the commission of or attempt to commit a dangerous felony when he was convicted only of possessing such a firearm, a Class D felony.1 The State concedes that the sentences and judgments for employment of a firearm were in error, and we agree. In all other respects, we affirm. Accordingly, though we affirm the Defendant’s convictions, we vacate and modify certain judgment forms and sentences consistent with this opinion. The case is remanded.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Stacy L. Street |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/02/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey Neal Olive
M2019-01379-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Jeffrey Neal Olive, was convicted by a Marshall County Circuit Court jury of second-degree murder, a Class A felony, and was sentenced to twenty years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, he argues that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction and that his sentence is excessive and contrary to law. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Forest A. Durard, Jr. |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/01/21 | |
Jesus Baltazar Diaz Ramos v. State of Tennessee
M2019-01525-CCA-R3-CO
The pro se Petitioner, Jesus Baltazar Diaz Ramos, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court summarily dismissing the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Jennifer Smith |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/01/21 | |
Delmar L. Mack, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
E2019-00273-CCA-R3-PC
Petitioner, Delmar L. Mack, Jr., appeals the Washington County Criminal Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Petitioner contends that his guilty pleas to attempted first degree murder, aggravated kidnapping, and aggravated assault were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because, at the time he entered his plea agreement, he was suffering from “severe mental distress and anxiety,” resulting in an inability to understand the nature and details of the agreement. Following a thorough review, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Lisa Rice |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Robert Edward Seaton
E2019-01225-CCA-R3-CD
Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Robert Edward Seaton, was convicted of facilitation of theft of property valued at $2,500 or more but less than $10,000, a Class E felony, and one count each of vandalism, evading arrest, and driving with a revoked license, second offense, Class A misdemeanors. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-11-403, -14-103, -14-105, - 14-408, -16-603, 55-50-504. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contends (1) that the trial court erred by denying the Defendant’s motion for a mistrial when a court officer, who was acting as jury custodian, was called and sworn as a rebuttal witness; (2) that the court erred by denying the Defendant’s motion for a mistrial after the court elicited from a defense witness the name of the witness’s father-in-law, who was “a notorious criminal and murderer”; (3) that the court erred by admitting reputation or opinion evidence from three law enforcement officers regarding a defense witness’s character for truthfulness; (4) that plain error occurred when the State cross-examined a defense witness regarding prior criminal behavior not resulting in a conviction; and (5) that the cumulative effect of these errors deprived the Defendant of a fair trial. Following our review, we conclude that the admission of reputation and opinion evidence from law enforcement officers constitutes reversible error such that the Defendant is entitled to a new trial. Alternatively, we conclude that the Defendant would be entitled to relief due to cumulative error.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge G. Scott Green |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Michelle Bennington
E2020-00025-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Michelle Bennington, filed a pro se motion pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct an alleged clerical error in a July 22, 2019 probation revocation order. The motion sought entry of a corrected order providing 827 days of postjudgment jail credit. The trial court determined that there was no clerical error in the revocation order and denied the motion. However, the trial court determined that there was a clerical error in the May 23, 2016 judgments of conviction and entered corrected judgments providing two additional days of pretrial jail credit. Finding no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
Tommie Phillips v. State of Tennessee
W2019-01927-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Tommie Phillips, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, which petition challenged his 2011 Shelby County Criminal Court jury convictions of felony murder, reckless homicide, attempted first degree murder, aggravated rape, aggravated sexual battery, especially aggravated kidnapping, and aggravated burglary. He argues that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Mark Ward |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jeffery D. Strong
M2018-00216-CCA-R3-CD
A Macon County Criminal Court Jury convicted the Appellant, Jeffery Dewayne Strong, of selling a Schedule III, controlled substance, a Class D felony, and the trial court sentenced him as a Range III, persistent offender to twelve years in confinement. On appeal, the Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court erred by allowing the State to play an audio recording of the controlled drug buy. Based upon the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and that the Appellant waived the issue regarding the audio recording because he failed to raise it in his motion for a new trial or at the hearing on the motion. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Brody N. Kane |
Macon County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Craig Rickard
M2019-01207-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Craig Rickard, was convicted by a Cheatham County Circuit Court jury of rape of a child and aggravated sexual battery and was sentenced pursuant to a pleabargained sentencing agreement to an effective term of twenty-five years at 100% in the Department of Correction. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by admitting the video recordings of the victim’s forensic interviews, in not conducting a jury out hearing to determine the victim’s qualifications as a witness, and by suggesting to the prosecutor the manner in which a question could be posed in order to avoid the Defendant’s hearsay objection. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Suzanne Lockert-Mash |
Cheatham County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/26/21 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jason Monroe Griffith
E2020-00259-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Jason Monroe Griffith, pleaded guilty to one count of attempted aggravated burglary, seven counts of aggravated burglary, ten counts of theft of property, and one count of conspiracy to commit aggravated burglary, and he entered a “best interest” plea to one count of aggravated burglary pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). The trial court imposed an effective sentence of 15 years and ordered the Defendant to pay $10,750 in restitution. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court should have held a hearing regarding his ability to pay restitution and the reasonableness of the restitution amount. After review, we reverse the judgment of the trial court with respect to restitution and remand this case for a restitution hearing and entry of amended judgments that reflect the amount of restitution and the manner of payment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge William K. Rogers |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/25/21 |